RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03200
INDEX CODE:137.04
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her late husband’s Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election of former spouse
coverage be changed to entitle her to an SBP annuity.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She contacted the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), Retiree’s
Benefits Office, to see if she was eligible for her late husband’s SBP
annuity. The DFAS office stated she was the beneficiary on record;
however, she was later advised that his former spouse was receiving the SBP
benefits and that they would have to contact Denver to see why.
She does not understand how on September 15, 1999, seven months after her
husband passed away, that he elected his former spouse as beneficiary when
she has documentation showing that his desire was to have her as the
beneficiary. After he was diagnosed with cancer and told he would die, he
sat down with her and told her that she would not have anything to worry
about and that she would be taken care of by the Air Force. She was with
him when he accomplished the forms designating her as his beneficiary. She
is now under the impression that his desires and wishes do not mean a
thing. He was retired from the Air Force before he married his former
spouse, and against his request, she is receiving his SBP benefits.
In support of her appeal, applicant submits a copy of his divorce decrees,
a copy of her marriage certificate, a copy of her late husband’s death
certificate and correspondence relating to SBP benefits from DFAS and the
AFBCMR. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The Military Personnel Database reflects applicant retired effective 1
October 1974.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPTR recommends the application be denied. DPPTR states that the
former member and the former spouse were divorced on 11 September 1996 and
the former spouse was awarded the SBP by the court, but neither submitted a
former spouse election change within the required time limit. The former
member failed to advise DFAS of the divorce and SBP premiums continued to
be deducted from his retired pay until 29 May 1998, when he notified DFAS
of his divorce and marriage to the applicant. At that time he requested
his former spouse be removed from the SBP and that the applicant be
designated as the eligible spouse beneficiary when she gained eligibility.
Even though the former member requested that the applicant be named the
beneficiary to the SBP before his death, the applicant would not have been
eligible for the annuity because the member died before they had been
married one full year. There are no provisions in law to waive the one-
year eligibility period for spouses acquired after retirement.
The AFPC/DPPTR evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant states she cannot argue against the legal reasons why the former
spouse is receiving the SBP annuity. She wants to state her views. It is
true that they fell short by a couple of days of being married for a year.
It was she who took care of him, in those trying times and final days. It
was he who told her not to worry, that he filed the forms and that the Air
Force would take care of her. It was she who was there, by his bedside,
watching him, desperately trying to make those final few days to their
anniversary. What bothers her most is that the woman he caught cheating on
him in his own bed is being rewarded with his SBP annuity. It was her
actions that caused the divorce. In his final moments, the former spouse
harassed and aggravated him whenever possible. It seems like a slap in his
face that his wishes and desires are not being carried out.
Applicant’s letter is at Exhibit D.
On 24 March 2003, a copy of a USAF/JAG evaluation regarding former spouse
requests for SBP coverage was forwarded to the applicant for review and
comment. As of this date, we have not received a response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error. We have reviewed the available evidence pertaining to
the applicant’s assertions related to her late husband’s Survivor Benefit
Plan (SBP) election, and we are unpersuaded that an SBP election change
from former spouse to entitle her to an SBP annuity based on the evidence
presented is warranted. Her contentions in this regard are duly noted;
however, in our opinion, the Air Force office of primary responsibility has
adequately addressed these contentions and we are in agreement with their
recommendation. It should be noted that even if the former spouse were not
eligible for SBP, the applicant would not receive the SBP annuity because
the member died before they had been married one full year. In view of the
above, we find no basis to warrant favorable consideration of this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 8 April 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Panel Chair
Ms. Joseph A. Roj, Member
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member
The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number 02-03200 was
considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Sep 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPPTR, dated 24 Oct 02.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Nov 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 7 Nov 02 w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 24 Mar 03, w/atchs.
KATHY L. BOOCKHOLDT
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03521
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03521 INDEX CODE: 137.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband's records be corrected so that she may be eligible for a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. They state that Public Law (PL) 98-525 permitted former spouses to submit a request to deem an SBP election change...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02849
There is no evidence the servicemember submitted a valid election to voluntarily change the SBP coverage from spouse to former spouse within the required one year time limit following their divorce. The servicemember married M. on 23 September 1994, and the servicemember did not request that SBP coverage be established on her behalf. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 21 November 2005, the Board staff forwarded...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02559
The parties divorced on 7 July 1998, and the court ordered the former member to maintain the SBP coverage on the applicant’s behalf; however, neither party submitted a valid election change during the required time. Specifically, as noted by the Chief, Administrative Law Division, Office of the Judge Advocate General, in his memorandum of 20 April 2004, on the subject, there are a number of court decisions by both state and federal judiciaries that have held that, despite the divorce decree...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00962
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00962 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 31 SEP 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Applicant is the ex-spouse of the deceased former servicemember, who requests her former late husband’s records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for former spouse coverage under the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03764
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR recommend that applicant’s request be denied and stated that there is no evidence of Air Force error or injustice, or merit in fact, nor basis in law to approve this case. Briefing material used at the time the member completed his RSFPP election clearly stated that “dependents acquired after you retire are not eligible to receive Family Protection Plan annuity payments,” payments would only...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01570
He told her that her husband was making SBP payments and therefore she should have been receiving an annuity after his death. DPPTR states there is no basis in law to waive the two-year survival requirement; however, if the Board’s decision is to grant relief, the record could be corrected to show the member elected spouse only SBP coverage based on full-retired pay on 27 July 1977, prior to the first marriage anniversary. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D).
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02657
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 02657 INDEX CODE: 137.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 FEBRUARY 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased former spouse’s records be corrected to show that he elected coverage for her under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Neither she nor her ex- husband was ever informed...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02913
The servicemember did not elect former spouse coverage on the applicant’s behalf. Counsel further states, based on the facts and the personal statement of the applicant, the Board should consider the benefit of doubt and find in favor of the applicant (Exhibit D). We do not take issue with the applicant’s contention that her divorce decree ordered her deceased former husband to provide former spouse coverage for her under the SBP, but he did not do so.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02727
DPPRT advises that there are no provisions in law to waive the one-year eligibility period for spouses acquired after retirement. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant resubmits a copy of the former member’s divorce decree and a copy of a letter from Alfred Truman Solicitors dated 24 September 2004. Applicant’s letter, with attachment is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02914
If provided the one-on-one briefing, his election for the SBP would have been former spouse SBP. The applicant contends his divorce decree requires him to provide SBP coverage for his former spouse. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2005-02914 in Executive Session on 10 February 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Panel Chair Ms. Renee M. Collier,...