Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02520
Original file (BC-2002-02520.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  02-02520
                                       INDEX CODE:  125.00, 131.05
      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX               COUNSEL: NONE

      XXXXXXXXXXXXX                     HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to show his date of rank (DOR) as a  senior  airman
Air National Guard/Air Force Reserve is 15 March 1996 and his paydate is  28
November 1992.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

An  error  was  made  in  calculating  his  DOR.   His   previous   Military
Occupational Specialty (MOS) 91B10, Medical Specialist, should have  been  a
direct conversion to Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 4N031, Medical  Service
Apprentice, at the time he enlisted in the Montana Air  National  Guard  (MT
ANG).  A direct conversion would allow him to maintain a  DOR  of  15  March
1996 instead of 23 September 2000.

His expiration of military service obligation  (MSO)  should  have  been  30
July 1998 instead of 24 February 1999.  If the Army used the  30  July  1998
MSO, his paydate would have been adjusted to 28 November 1992 instead of  22
June 1993 effecting his years of service and longevity pay increases.

In support of his application, he provided a personal statement;  copies  of
his ARMY separation order, ARNG separation order and record  of  service;  a
copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release  or  Discharge  from  Active
Duty; his ANG assignment order  and  an  excerpt  from  ANGI  36-2002.   The
applicant’s complete submission with attachments is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is a former  member  of  the  Army  and  Army  National  Guard
(ARNG).  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 April 1991 and was  separated
on 7 April 1993 with an MSO of 24 February 1999.  He enlisted into the  ARNG
on 31 July 1995 and was progressively promoted to the  grade  of  Specialist
(E-4) with a DOR of 15 June 1994.  On 30 July 1998, he  separated  from  the
ARNG with a MSO of 30 July 1998.

While in the ARNG, the applicant  received  formal  training  as  a  Medical
Specialist, MOS 91B10.  The  Army  career  field,  Medical  Specialist  (MOS
91B10), is a direct conversion to Air Force career  field,  Medical  Service
Apprentice,  AFSC  4N031.   The  applicant  enlisted  into  the  ANG  on  23
September 2000 for a period of six years in the grade of Senior Airman  with
a DOR of 23 September 2000.  At the time of the applicant’s enlistment,  the
gaining unit did not  have  a  vacancy  in  the  4N031  career  field.   The
applicant agreed to enlist into the Health Service  Management,  AFSC  4A031
career field.  Eight months later, the applicant transferred into the  4N031
career field.

Examiner’s note:  The applicant was contacted on 15 January 2003 to  provide
a copy of his Army enlistment contract.  As of this date,  this  office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ANG/DPFP reviewed the applicant’s  case  file  and  recommends  disapproval.
Because the applicant chose to enlist into  the  Health  Service  Management
career field 4A301, the direct conversion from his Army MOS could  not  take
place.  DPFP states that the Army  must  address  the  issue  of  a  paydate
discrepancy.  The DPFP evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  the  applicant  on  6
December 2002 for review and response (Exhibit D).  As of this date,  this
office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence  has  been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of probable injustice warranting a change in the  applicant’s  DOR
to SrA.

      a.  Based on the evidence, it appears that no error  occurred  at  the
time the applicant transferred from the  Army  National  Guard  to  the  Air
National Guard on 23 September 2000.  However, we believe the  Air  National
Guard benefited and continues to benefit from the applicant’s knowledge  and
experience in his previous career field when, just a few  months  later,  he
was assigned to  a  Medical  Service  Apprentice  position.   Therefore,  to
rectify any possible injustice, the applicant’s DOR  as  an  SrA  should  be
changed to 15 March 1996.

      b.  Based on the evidence of records and the evidence provided by  the
applicant, there is no basis to correct his paydate from 22 June 1993 to  28
November 1992.  Accordingly, his  request  to  change  his  paydate  is  not
favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that, at the time of his  enlistment  in
the Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve, he was  awarded  a  date  of
rank (DOR) as a Senior Airman of 15 March 1996.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 5 March 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Ms. Marilyn Thomas, Panel Chair
      Mr. William H. Anderson, Member
      Mr. Thomas J. Topolski Jr., Member


The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR  Docket  Number  02-02520  was
considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 24 July 2002, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, ANG/DPFP, dated 12 November 2002.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 December 2002.




                                  MARILYN THOMAS
                                  Panel Chair


AFBCMR 02-02520




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that at the time
of his enlistment in the Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve, he was
awarded a date of rank (DOR) as a Senior Airman of 15 March 1996.





  JOE G. LINEBERGER

  Director

  Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03451

    Original file (BC-2002-03451.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03451 INDEX CODE: 102.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 14 months time in grade as an E-4 that he accrued in the Army be applied towards his date of rank (DOR) in the Air National Guard (ANG). He enlisted as an Airman First Class (A1C/E-3) with a date of rank of 2 February 2001 and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9701735

    Original file (9701735.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He assumed that his 7-level training had begun at that time, as did his supervisors, and that, when the correction to his promotion dates was approved, the mandatory 18 months of OJT training would be backdated also. In support of his amended request, the applicant provided a copy of his Classification/On-the-Job Training Actions, dated 29 September 1997 (see Exhibit A). Exhibit C. Letter, ANG/MPPU, dated 3 March 1998, with Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 25 March 1998. b H A R L E S E....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01965

    Original file (BC-2003-01965.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. __________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 18 September 1986, the applicant enlisted in the Air National Guard (ANG) at the age of 18 in the rank of airman basic (E-1) in the Air Force Specialty Code 43132E, Apprentice Strategic Aircraft Maintenance Specialist. On 9 November 2001, according to the Military Personnel Data System (MILPDS), the applicant enlisted in the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03515

    Original file (BC-2004-03515.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He enlisted in the Florida Air National Guard (FLANG) while a senior in high school. DPFOC contends ANG Instruction (ANGI) 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force, states airmen who graduate from BMTS may be promoted to A1C if their Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) is included on the Status of Resources and Training System (SORTS) list. DPFOC’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200676

    Original file (0200676.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Unfortunately, the other unit within the state held a promotion board and used the allocation during the same time of his promotion board. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that the control grade roster provided by DPFP is from April 2001 and does not reflect the information that it should. This would reflect an error on the part of the monthly control grade report.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01514

    Original file (BC-2003-01514.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He had 4 years TIS and 3 years TIG at the time of his enlistment and other than the 3-level waiver, was fully qualified to be promoted to the grade of Senior Airman/E-4. A waiver was submitted, however the waiver was not timely approved because it lacked the necessary proof of certification. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02258

    Original file (BC-2010-02258.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His promotion to the grade of senior airman (E-4) be adjusted to an effective date of 1 February 2009. AFI 10-201 refers the applicant’s career field to the “Prime Ribs Managers Guide.” The mission capabilities statement that was provided with the applicant’s request is from the guide and states “Specific grades denote SORTS critical positions.” The listing only has two positions that have specific grades; both of them are 7-level AFSCs. We took notice of the applicant's complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00027

    Original file (BC 2014 00027.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 Nov 13, the applicant was promoted to the grade of E-3. As such, he was never eligible for promotion to the grade of E-3, effective 21 Jun 13, as requested. A complete copy of the NGB/A1PP additional evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He argues a change to the FY13, R&R Initiatives added his AFSC 2T2X1 to the critical skills AFSC list, effective 1 Oct 12, as verified through his Force Support Squadron (FSS).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03004

    Original file (BC-2002-03004.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03004 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general, under other than honorable conditions, discharge be upgraded to honorable. Applicant was demoted to A1C with an effective and date of rank of 25 October 1994. DPFP notes also that based on the discharge record...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0101763

    Original file (0101763.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. ANG/DPFP indicates that neither the military personnel flight (MPF) nor the state headquarters was able to provide documentation substantiating the applicant's claim for the AFAM. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant withdrew his requests for the AFGCM and the AFAM, and acknowledges the administrative...