Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02513
Original file (BC-2002-02513.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-02513
            INDEX CODE:  128.02
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The departure address in item 1 on his AF Form  766,  Extended  Active  Duty
(EAD) Order, dated 25 March 2002, be changed to reflect his Home  of  Record
(HOR) address.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The applicant makes no contentions.

In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his EAD order.   His
complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant was appointed a second lieutenant, Reserve of the  Air  Force,  on
21 Aug 00 and was voluntarily ordered to EAD on 23 Jul 02.  He is  currently
serving on EAD in the grade of first lieutenant.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted  from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the  letter  prepared  by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPAO  reviewed  applicant’s  request  and  recommends  denial.   DPPAO
states that it appears that  the  applicant  accomplished  a  Do-It-Yourself
(DITY) move from Aurora, WV, and wants his EAD  order  changed  to  use  the
address on the travel voucher.  According to Blocks 1  and  13  on  his  EAD
order, he entered EAD from Daytona Beach, FL, on 23  Mar  02.   In  November
2001, he provided DPPAO a  Form  53,  Cadet  Classification  and  Assignment
Worksheet, with the address information, that he now wants  changed.   Using
the information  he  provided,  the  EAD  orders  were  published.   No  HOR
information was provided on the Form 53.  When it is  not  provided,  it  is
understood to be the same as the EAD  address.   Based  on  the  information
provided by the applicant, his EAD orders were published correctly.

The DPPAO evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13  Sep
02 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence  has  been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.   It  appears  that  upon  his  entry  onto
active duty, the applicant's home  of  record  was  Aurora,  West  Virginia.
When  he  completed  his  Form  53,  Cadet  Classification  and   Assignment
Worksheet, he did not provide his home of record  address  and  accordingly,
the address from which he entered active duty was annotated as his  home  of
record.  It is our opinion that perhaps with a clearer understanding in  the
preparation and use of the Form 53, the applicant would  have  provided  the
required information and his home of record would  have  been  appropriately
documented.  Therefore, in  an  effort  to  remove  any  possibility  of  an
injustice, we recommend that his records should be corrected to  the  extent
indicated below.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that Block 1  of  AF  Form  766,  Extended
Active Duty Order, Special Order A-0796, dated 25 March 2002, be amended  to
reflect Extended Active Duty address as HC 82 Box  216,  Aurora,  WV  26705,
rather than 1229 South Beach Street, Daytona Beach, FL 32114.


_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board  considered  Docket  Number  02-02513  in
Executive Session on 12 Nov 02, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Panel Chair
      Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member
      Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member

All members voted to correct the records,  as  recommended.   The  following
documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 6 Aug 02, w/atch.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPPAO, dated 5 Sep 02, w/atchs.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Sep 02.




                             PEGGY E. GORDON
                                             Panel Chair

AFBCMR 02-02513




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that Block 1  of  AF  Form  766,
Extended Active Duty Order, Special Order A-0796, dated  25 March  2002,  be
amended to reflect Extended Active Duty address as HC 82  Box  216,  Aurora,
WV 26705, rather than 1229 South Beach Street, Daytona Beach, FL 32114.









  JOE G. LINEBERGER

  Director

  Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03675

    Original file (BC 2014 03675.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 January 2005, the applicant was appointed to the Air Force Reserve via AF Form 24, Application for Appointment as Reserve of the Air Force or USAF without Component, and recorded her HOR address as Boynton Beach-Palm Beach, FL. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our conclusion...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02428

    Original file (BC-2006-02428.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    His extended active duty (EAD) orders be corrected to show his EAD date as 10 June 2006 rather than 17 June 2006. An AF IMT Form 766, Extended Active Duty Order, reflects the effective date of duty as 17 June 2006, with two days travel time. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair AFBCMR BC-2006-02428 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01367

    Original file (BC 2014 01367.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant provides his Michigan state medical license; internship completion certificate from the hospital he was trained; a letter of acceptance for residency upon completion of his military commitment; his travel order for a flight physical showing he resided in Rochester Hills, MI; and a copy of his AF IMT 766, Extended Active Duty Order. Block 5 of the AF IMT Form 766 lists Mawdan, ND as his “Home of Record.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01422

    Original file (BC 2014 01422.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01422 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her place of entry on active duty (PLEAD) be corrected to reflect Knoxville, Tennessee (TN). As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03711

    Original file (BC-2004-03711.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    To do so will subject you to forfeiture of travel pay.” In addition to the memo, the member received an EAD order, AF Form 766, that clearly states (in block 13) in bold letters “Do not begin travel prior to your effective date of duty.” All detachment commanders are required to provide the aforementioned memo. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04246

    Original file (BC 2014 04246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04246 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home or Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect San Antonio, Texas on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. According to the AF Form 768, Extended Active Duty Order, the applicant commissioned with the Regular Air Force on 14 Aug 04. The applicant’s military personnel record was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02328

    Original file (BC 2014 02328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02328 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 7a – Place of Entry into Active Duty (PLEAD), be corrected to reflect “San Antonio, Texas”. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02924

    Original file (BC 2014 02924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 7a (Place of Entry into Active Duty (PLEAD)) reflect Niceville, FL, rather than Tuscaloosa, AL. b. Item 7b (Home of Record (HOR) at Time of Entry) reflect Niceville, FL, rather than Clifton, VA. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200529

    Original file (0200529.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFMPC/DPPAO states block 13 on the applicant's Extended Active Duty Orders (AF Form 766) has his effective date of duty as on or after 3 February 2002 and that he should report to Los Angeles AFB, no later than 2400 hours on that date. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01105

    Original file (BC 2014 01105.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01105 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home Of Record (HOR) be changed from XXXXXXXXXX to XXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXXX, was his correct HOR and the place he resided for almost two years prior to commissioning at the University of XXXXXXXXXX Y, after graduating from Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC). While the Board notes the comment from...