RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02540
INDEX CODE: 100.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The address on her entry on extended active duty orders be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the
letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of
Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAO reviewed this application and recommended denial.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B.
HQ USAF/DPPCC reviewed this application and recommended denial.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 20
Sep 02 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been
received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After careful consideration of
applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find
insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective
action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear
to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by
applicant. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to
which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb
the existing record.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
02540 in Executive Session on 29 Oct 02, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Panel Chair
Mr. Christopher Carey, Member
Mr. Billy C. Baxter, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Aug 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPPAO, dated 5 Sep 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ USAF/DPPCC, dated 12 Sep 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Sep 02.
PEGGY E. GORDON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02513
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02513 INDEX CODE: 128.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The departure address in item 1 on his AF Form 766, Extended Active Duty (EAD) Order, dated 25 March 2002, be changed to reflect his Home of Record (HOR) address. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-00745A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-00745 INDEX CODES: 131.01, 131.09 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be directly promoted to the grade of colonel; or, he again be given Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the grade of colonel by the Calendar Year 2001A (CY01A) Colonel...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01180
On 2 Apr 02, the applicant's request for remission of his indebtedness of $2903.50 was considered and denied by the Director, Air Force Review Boards Agency (AFRBA) (Exhibit B). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/DPPCC noted that as a result of non-availability, the applicant's orders were amended to read "Members auth full per diem, for off base lodging and commercial meals to maintain team integrity. To remedy the error, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01661
However, should the Board approve the relief sought, the record should be corrected to reflect a pay date of 17 Mar 87. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the following legal opinion is provided. Exhibit F. Letter, HQ USAF/JAG, dated 28 Feb 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02545
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02545 INDEX CODE 108.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be afforded the opportunity to appeal before a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) the decision to remove him from the Temporary Disability Retirement List (TDRL). Apparently no response was received and, by letter date 24 Jul 02, HQ...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02566
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/DPPCC recommends the application be denied. DPPCC states that, according to the DoD FMR, Volume 7A, Chapter 26, Table 26-3, Rule 1: “If a member is assigned to a permanent station and...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03886
A complete copy of the HQ USAF/DPPCC evaluation is at Exhibit B. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). While we find the applicant’s situation to be unfortunate, in the absence of sufficient evidence that his current BAH rate is erroneous, we agree with the recommendation of the OPR and adopt their rationale as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of establishing that he has suffered either an error or an injustice.
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 27 Sep 02 for review and response. After careful...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02561
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPO notes that DODD 1310.1 and Title 10, USC, Section 1431.7, allow for the transfer of a Reserve promotion to the Active Duty List (ADL) if an officer of the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) and on a promotion list as a result of selection for promotion by a mandatory promotion board or a Special Selection Board (SSB) and who, before being promoted, is placed on the ADL of the same Armed...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00348 INDEX CODE: 128.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed (in the amount of $3965.22) for expenses she incurred as a result of the partial mobilization orders that were cancelled on 16 November 2001. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the...