Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201360
Original file (0201360.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-01360
            INDEX CODE:  107.00

            COUNSEL:  TOMMY CLACK

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The following awards be added to his DD Form 214:  Good Conduct Medal,
Air Force Longevity Service Award, Vietnam Service Medal with 3 Bronze
Service Stars, Air Force Achievement  Medal,  Air  Force  Commendation
Medal, Presidential Unit Citation, republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross
with Palm, and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Medal.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The reasons the applicant believes the  records  to  be  in  error  or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support  of  the  appeal  are  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from  the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared  by
the appropriate office of the Air Force.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR  states  that  the  applicant’s  records  were   thoroughly
reviewed for his eligibility for, and entitlement to, all  awards  and
decorations.  Applicant did not provide any documentation  to  support
his claims for additional  awards  or  decorations,  and  he  did  not
respond to their request to either provide supporting documentation or
withdraw his claim for those they could not verify.   Therefore,  they
recommend denial of applicant’s  request.   A  complete  copy  of  the
evaluation, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 26 July 2002, a complete copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days.  As
of this date, no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Staff
and adopt their rationale as the basis for  our  conclusion  that  the
applicant  has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or   injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling basis to recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application  on  10
September 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Thomas J. Topolski, Jr., Member
                 Ms. Marilyn Thomas, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:



   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 18 Apr 02, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 9 Jul 02.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 26 Jul 02.




                                   JOSEPH A. ROJ
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201392

    Original file (0201392.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01392 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt their rationale as the basis for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02763

    Original file (BC-2002-02763.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02763 INDEX CODE: 107.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) instead of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial stating...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02275

    Original file (BC-2002-02275.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02275 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded a campaign medal for participation in “Operation Urgent Fury.” ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0101027

    Original file (0101027.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01027 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) medal. He was awarded the PH by a general officer while he was in the hospital. He recently received a formal letter of presentation from the President of Korea which included the new ribbon and medal.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9803540

    Original file (9803540.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03540 INDEX CODE 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect receipt of the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with “V” (AFOUA/V) Device [administratively granted - see below] and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E. On...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201117

    Original file (0201117.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was requested to provide any documents from his personal files in support of his application and he has not responded to the request. They recommend the requested relief be denied (Exhibit D). There was no evidence in the applicant's records to support he served in Korea or Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103591

    Original file (0103591.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his Individual Flight Records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s available military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. His Individual Flight Records show that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03355

    Original file (BC-2002-03355.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03355 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Good Conduct Medal. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request for award of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01922

    Original file (BC-2007-01922.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 15 February 1968, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the age of 19 for a period of four years in the rank of airman basic (E-1). We note the applicant’s assertion that he was awarded the DFC; however, there is no indication in his records that he was recommended for, or awarded, the DFC. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02579

    Original file (BC-2003-02579.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is a document that shows a 12-month tour in Vietnam from 28 August 1971 to 24 August 1972, however, the document is dated four years after the applicant was released from active duty. The evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 5 March 2004, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. There is a document which shows a...