RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02275
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His separation be changed to general, under honorable conditions,
and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so he may
reenlist in the military.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He may not have mentioned everything about his probation but he did
not lie about it either. He was told that it would be no problem
by someone who was supposed to know what they were doing. This
situation is just as much the Air Force’s fault as it is his. He
was told the day he was discharged that he was ineligible for
reentry into the Air Force but that he could join another branch of
service under the separation and reentry codes he was given. He
found out that he is not eligible for entry into any other branch.
Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 15 May 01, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force
(RegAF) for a period of six years in the grade of airman basic.
On 19 Jun 01, the applicant was notified that his commander was
recommending that he be discharged from the Air Force for
fraudulent entry. The reason for the commander’s actions was that
the applicant failed to disclose that he was on probation for a law
violation (speeding). Had the Air Force known of this history, it
could have rendered him ineligible to enlist.
On 19 Jun 01, applicant waived his right to consult counsel and
waived his right to submit statements. The case file was found
legally sufficient to support separation.
On 28 Jun 01, the applicant was separated from the Air Force under
the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen,
(Fraudulent Entry into Military Service), with an uncharacterized
entry level separation, an RE code of 2C (Involuntarily separated
with an honorable discharge; or, entry level separation without
characterization of service), and a Separation Program Designator
(SPD) code JDA (Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service). He served
1 month and 14 days of total active service but received no credit
for this time due to his fraudulent entry.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS reviewed this application and recommends denial. They
state that airmen are given entry level separation/uncharacterized
service characterization when separation is initiated in the first
180 days of continuous active service. The Department of Defense
(DOD) determined if a member served less than 180 days of
continuous active service, it would be unfair to the member and the
service to characterize their limited service. Therefore, the
applicant’s uncharacterized character of service is correct and in
accordance with DOD and Air Force instructions. An entry
level/uncharacterized separation should not be viewed as negative
and should not be confused with other types of separation. Based
upon the documentation in the file, the discharge was consistent
with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge
regulation at that time. Additionally, the discharge was within
the sound discretion of the discharge authority.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at
Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant’s mother provided a letter on her son’s behalf (see
Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice warranting corrective
action. We found no evidence that responsible officials applied
inappropriate standards in effecting the applicant’s discharge,
that pertinent regulations were violated or that the applicant was
not afforded all the rights to which entitled at the time of
discharge. Nevertheless, after careful review of the evidence
provided, a majority of the Board is of the opinion that to
continue to show the narrative reason for separation as “Fraudulent
Entry Into Military Service” would be unduly harsh and therefore
would create an injustice to the applicant. Therefore, a majority
of the Board recommends that his narrative reason for separation be
changed to “Secretarial Authority,” with the corresponding
separation code of “KFF.” A majority of the Board also recommends
that the applicant’s reenlistment eligibility code be changed to RE-
3K. This is a code that can be waived for prior enlistment
consideration, provided he meets all other requirements for
enlistment under an existing prior service program. Whether or not
he is selected for enlistment will be based on the needs of the
service to which application is made.
4. Applicant’s request that his uncharacterized entry level
separation be changed to general, under honorable conditions, is
duly noted. However, airmen are considered to be in an entry level
status during the first 180 days of continuous active duty. If
discharge action is initiated during this time, as in the
applicant’s case, the separation is described as an entry level
separation. Based on the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence
to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend favorable
action on the applicant’s request to change his entry level
separation to a general, under honorable conditions, discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 28 June 2001,
he received an entry level separation by reason of “Secretarial
Authority,” with Separation Program Designator Code “KFF,” and
reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 3K.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 31 January 2002, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Edward H. Parker, Panel Chair
Ms. Martha Maust, Member
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
A majority of the panel voted to correct the records as
recommended. Mr. Russell voted to deny applicant’s requests but
does not wish to submit a minority report. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Aug 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 18 Sep 01.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 5 Oct 01.
Exhibit E. Letter fr mother, dated 15 Jan 02, w/atch.
EDWARD H. PARKER
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 01-02275
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that on 28 June 2001, he
received an entry level separation by reason of “Secretarial
Authority,” with Separation Program Designator Code “KFF,” and
reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 3K.
JOE G.
LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force
Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-00372
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00372 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 20 MAY 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His character of service (uncharacterized), his reentry code (2C) and his narrative reason for separation (fraudulent entry) be changed and/or removed from his DD 214. He started having...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC2007-02179
It appears the specific reasons for this action was that she had back problems prior to entry on active duty but failed to disclose these problems until she was in BMT. In addition, SGPS states if the findings of the Board are in favor with the applicant, they can support her request to change her RE Code from “Fraudulent Entry” to "Not Medically Qualified.” The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial. The applicant was discharged from the Air Force for...
On 17 Sep 98, applicant was notified by his commander that she was recommending that he be discharged from the Air Force for fraudulent entry. The records indicate the applicant’s military service was properly reviewed and appropriate action was taken. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Special Programs & BCMR Manager, AFPC/DPPAES, also reviewed this application and indicated that a review of the applicant’s case file was conducted and the RE code is...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02332
The documentation on file in the master personnel records supports the basis for discharge and the applicant's entry level service characterization. The complete AFPC/DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of his request for a change his RE code, stating, the RE code of 2C is driven by his entry level separation with uncharacterized service. On 11 Aug 2011, HQ AETC/SGPS validated the applicant's discharge processing, but state they support a change of the RE code to...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02963
He was informed by his commander that there was no guarantee of the job he would receive, but he would most likely be assigned to Security Forces. On 19 Jul 05, he was academically eliminated from the Air Traffic Control course because he failed the Block II, Unit 9 test with a 52% score. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 11 Oct 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02992
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE indicated that the applicant’s RE code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) is correct. AFPC/JA stated that the applicant’s arrest record could have been a basis for rejecting him from Air Force service. The evidence of record reflects that the applicant was discharged with an entry level separation for fraudulent entry based on...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02992
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE indicated that the applicant’s RE code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) is correct. AFPC/JA stated that the applicant’s arrest record could have been a basis for rejecting him from Air Force service. The evidence of record reflects that the applicant was discharged with an entry level separation for fraudulent entry based on...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00455
Toward the end of basic training, he received orders. AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE stated that the applicant separated on 9 June 1994, after serving 3 months and 29 days active service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 9 June 1994, he was separated under the provisions of AFR 39-10...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01211
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01211 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation (Fraudulent Entry into Military Service - Drug Abuse) and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code (2C) be changed to allow him to enlist in the military service. On 30 March 1995, the applicant was...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00156 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: NYS Division VA SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Applicant requests that the reenlistment code (RE) she received be changed or waived to allow her to reenter military service. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...