RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01904
INDEX CODE 135.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be
amended to include his training as an Individual Ready Reservist from 1988
through 1989.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and
the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the
appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPPS reviewed this application and recommended denial. A complete
copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1
February 2002 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however,
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR 01-01904 in Executive
Session on 14 March 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Panel Chair
Mr. John E. Pettit, Member
Mr. Albert J. Starnes, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Sep 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPS, dated 23 Jan 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Feb 02.
PEGGY E. GORDON
Panel Chair
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states General S, states in an Army Air Force (AAF) Letter 35-77 dated 29 May 1946, that there is no rank of flight officers in the AAF reserve. Notwithstanding this, no evidence has been presented to show the applicant applied for a commission as required by the regulations of that time. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03393
A health professions officer nominated for PV promotion must complete their PME by the PRF submission date, 45 days before the board convenes. We note that apparently in accordance with the established governing policy, the applicant’s nomination for a PV promotion was returned because she had not completed the appropriate level of professional military education (PME) at the time the PRF was submitted. In this respect, the Board notes that a health professions officer nominated for PV...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Before she entered the Air Force in 1995, she was told by recruiters in the Judge Advocate General’s (JAG) recruiting office in Washington DC that there was a 4-year active duty service commitment with a 2- year inactive Reserve commitment upon discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPA concedes it is regretful that the applicant...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPP states that under the provisions of Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C), Section 12731, a retired reserve member is eligible for retired pay upon completion of at least 20 years of satisfactory service with the last 6 years of qualifying service in a Reserve component. Under 10 U.S.C, Section 12371a, a reserve member may be eligible for retired pay based on physical disqualification, providing...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01788 INDEX CODE: 135.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her retirement year ending (RYE) 27 July 2001, be changed from an unsatisfactory year to a satisfactory year. She reported for active duty on 4 July 2001, served her annual tour, stayed to fulfill the year’s IDT’s, and returned to...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02227 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with theprocedural and substantive...
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Upon his release from active duty, he transferred to the Air Force Reserve and never received an orientation from his unit of assignment on the requirements needed for proper credit toward a good year for retirement. If he had that support upon his assignment to the Cat B position in the Air Force Reserve, he would not be asking for the credit. ...
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 1 Mar 02 for review and response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00348 INDEX CODE: 128.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed (in the amount of $3965.22) for expenses she incurred as a result of the partial mobilization orders that were cancelled on 16 November 2001. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the...
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. Applicant was not recommended for promotion. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.