RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03249
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The debt that he failed to timely pay resulted from charges on his military
credit card (American Express) during temporary duties (TDYs) the summer of
1996. The first TDY was to Korea. This was not an annual tour and the
money he received from his TDY voucher covered the majority of his
expenses. The next TDY was to Japan and this was considered his annual
tour. He did not receive an amount of pay similar to his Korean tour. In
addition, he had an unusually high telephone bill from calling his wife in
Shreveport. The TDYs together resulted in a significant shortage between
his credit card bill and what he received from the Air Force as
reimbursement.
In order to resolve and pay the debt to American Express he decided to work
man days to earn extra money. He then was informed that since he had a
debt with American Express he was ineligible to work extra man days.
During this time period he had left employment with the C--- Sheriff’s
Department and joined the S--- Police Department. This resulted in a
$600.00 per month decrease in pay.
The first corrective action he received was a loss of man days. The second
corrective action was a counseling session December 1996. In January 1997
at his UTA he was handed discharge papers.
He states that he did his job well and had no disciplinary actions until
his credit card problem. He has paid the American Express credit card and
has continued employment with the Shreveport Police Department.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a copy of Reserve Order A-
121, dated 28 April 1997, letter from American Express, dated 3 October
1997, and three character reference letters.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
During the time period in question, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force
Reserve on 15 October 1993 in the grade of staff sergeant for a period of
four (6) years.
The applicant was notified of his commander's intent to initiate discharge
action against him for a pattern of misconduct - failure to pay just debt.
The specific reason follows:
On 7 December 1996 and 4 January 1997, the applicant wrongfully
failed to pay the balance due of $994 on his Government American Express
card account. He has two letters of reprimand and a letter of counseling
documenting the unit’s effort to rehabilitate him. In addition, he has
been counseled on two occasions about being late for work.
The commander indicated in his recommendation for discharge action that he
had personally counseled the applicant and presented him with documentation
concerning his misconduct and his efforts had no positive impact.
On 25 February 1997, the Staff Judge Advocate recommended administrative
action be initiated against the applicant as proposed by his squadron
commander.
A legal review was conducted by JA, Chief, Administrative Law, and they
recommended that the applicant be discharged with a general (under
honorable conditions) discharge.
Applicant was discharged on 13 May 1997, in the grade of airman basic with
a general (under honorable conditions) discharge, under the provisions of
AFI 36-3209, paragraph 3.21.2, Misconduct-Pattern of Misconduct, Failure to
Pay Just Debt. He served a total of 3 years, 6 months, and 28 days on his
last enlistment and 9 years, 4 months and 3 days of total military service.
On 20 March 2001, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered
and granted applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge from
general (under honorable conditions) to an honorable discharge and changed
the narrative reason for discharge from Pattern of Misconduct - Failure to
Pay Just Debts to Secretarial Authority.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/DPML indicated that based upon the recommendation of the Discharge
Review Board and under the directions of SAF/MRBR, they have rescinded the
applicant’s discharge order (RO-A-121, 28 April 1997) and reissued a new
one (RO A-040, 11 March 2002). The new order reflects a discharge upgrade
to Honorable and the reason for discharge as Secretarial Authority.
However, the applicant’s request to change his reenlistment eligibility
status from ineligible to eligible for reenlistment was not addressed.
They do not recommend approval of applicant’s request based upon an
approved involuntary discharge for his misconduct. If the AFBCMR
determines that administrative relief should be granted, then this office
should be directed to amend or rescind the applicant’s discharge order to
reflect a reenlistment eligibility status of eligible.
The evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 5 April 2002, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response within thirty (30) days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or an injustice warranting a change in the
applicant’s RE code. In this respect, the majority notes the findings of
the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgrading the applicant’s
discharge to honorable conditions and changing the narrative reason for the
applicant’s discharge to Secretarial Authority and the applicant’s apparent
strong desire to serve his country. In view of the foregoing, the Board
majority believes the applicant should be given the opportunity to enlist
in the armed forces. Whether or not he is successful will depend upon the
needs of the service and the majority’s recommendation in no way guarantees
that he will be allowed to return to the Air Force or any branch of the
armed forces. Therefore, the majority recommends that his reenlistment
eligibility record be corrected to reflect “eligible.”
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that his reenlistment eligibility (RE)
code, issued in conjunction with his honorable discharge on 13 May 1997 was
“eligible.”
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 00-03249 in
Executive Session on 21 May 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Panel Chair
Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Member
By a majority vote, the Board recommended to grant the applicant’s request.
Mr. Russell voted to deny applicant’s request and does not wish to submit
a Minority Report. The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 December 2000, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFRC/DPML, dated 13 March 2002, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 April 2002.
PEGGY E. GORDON
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 00-03249
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to , be corrected to show his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code,
issued in conjunction with his honorable discharge on 13 May 1997 was
“eligible.”
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00041
7 (Change Discharge to Honorable and Change the Reason and Authority for Discharge) Issue 1: The General Discharge and ineligible for reenlistment status were inequitable when considered in light of the isolated nature of the offense (credit card debt incurred during two close in time tours of duty), an otherwise exemplary record in over eight years of military service, voluntary payment of the credit card debt after discharge, and an admirable record of employment and service to my...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03866
On 28 June 1991, applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve for a period of 6 years in the grade of E-5. In a legal review of the commander’s recommendation, dated 7 March 1998, the wing Deputy Group Staff Judge Advocate, noted that, on 2 August 1997, the applicant submitted a letter to his supervisor in which he apologized for his misconduct and indicated it was “unintentional.” This officer recommended the case be forwarded to the Air Force Reserve Center (AFRC) commander with a...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00489
This is Government Card Services knows this as mentioned in the I should have been notified of all punitive UCMJ action being considered against me IAW FM 27-1, FM 2701, and Article 1 3 8 ~ . You are eligible for an administrative discharge board. Information is provided at Attachment 7. regarding an administrative discharge board 5.
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 27 January 1961. On 6 May 1998 the applicant was notified of his new counsel and the new board date. DPZ referred to the JAJ review of the case for support of their position on the matter and recommended denial of the applicant’s request (Exhibit D).
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0299
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME. OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAT) GRADE AFSN/SSAN a. SSGT TYPE ee . PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW i NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORCANIZATION HS os seem OT ATWIRESS ANT OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ~~ MEMBERS SITTING HON OTHER hs — ——m ee ee xe tn ieeeeeieteeims ee fever teen er ea amanenmet |G tP rem ca en eacemmag s TRALES “TYINDEXNUMBER S—SSCs‘C;‘
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02803
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2002-02803 INDEX CODE 100.06 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “4E” (Grade is airman first class (A1C) or below and airman completed 31 or more months, if a first-term airman) be changed to one that will allow enlistment in the Air National Guard (ANG)....
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0235
(Change Discharge to General) Issue 1: I served a total of 6 years and 3 months in the Air Force. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force and will probably be denied enlistment in any | componant of the armed forces. If applicable, the discharge board or; the discharge authority will make the finding and recommendations regarding advanced educational assistance required under 10 U.S.C.
# DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97-00442 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: .. of the Departmeat of the Air Force relating to- e corrected to show that he had no other alternative but to mercial travel office (CTO) not under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070254C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He was only receiving about $300.00 per month. A 28 September 1998 letter of support from another SFC stated, in effect, that the applicant's finance problems had been beyond his control, that he had mis-used the Government American Express Credit Card out of a legitimate need to provide for his family and that, although the applicant had gone to the Army Community...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01438 INDEX CODE: 110.03 COUNSEL: HENRY MAYNARD, SR HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated to Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) status to include back pay and benefits and, until such time, he be given separation pay. The commander’s reasons were: the applicant’s wrongful appropriation of unauthorized cash advances in the amount of $1,100.00, having an unpaid balance...