RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03113
INDEX NUMBER: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her narrative reason for separation be changed to "Attend School Full Time
in an Officer Training Program" versus "Officer Training Program."
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and
the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the
appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibit C and F.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS, Separations Branch, reviewed this application and recommended
denial. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant's response to the AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFROTC/RRUE recommended denial of applicant's request. A complete copy
of the evaluation is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the additional evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 3 August 2001, for review and comments; however, as of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of a probable injustice to warrant changing the narrative reason
for the applicant’s separation. In this respect, we note that the
applicant was discharged to attend school full time in the Reserve Officer
Training Corps (ROTC) Program. However, the applicant has indicated that
she is ineligible to receive unemployment compensation from the state of
Florida unless her DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged to attend
school full time. The applicant alleges that she was miscounseled;
however, she has failed to provide evidence to support this contention.
While normally this Board would require such evidence prior to rendering a
favorable decision, based on the circumstances of this case (i.e.,
applicant has completed the ROTC program, obtained a commission, and only
received a $200.00 monthly ROTC stipend resulting in a financial hardship),
we believe the interest of justice can best be served by resolving any
doubt in her behalf. In view of this, and since the ROTC program requires
full time status, we recommend her DD Form 214, issued on 24 August 2000,
be amended to reflect that she was separated to attend school full time in
an officer training program. The applicant should be advised that this
Board has no control over whether she is successful in receiving
unemployment compensation from the state of Florida. However, we believe
the recommended correction to her record will provide her fitting relief
since it will provide her an opportunity to apply for unemployment
compensation.
4. Although not requested by the applicant, she also alleges that she was
miscounselled regarding her eligibility for scholarships, O1-E pay, and the
Professional Officer Course Incentive (POCI). However, since she was
commissioned after her 30th birthday she is ineligible for the POCI and
could not apply for scholarships. Since she separated prior to completion
of over four years of enlisted service, she is also ineligible for O1-E
pay. Applicant has failed to provide evidence showing that she was
miscounseled regarding these issues. Therefore, we find no basis upon
which to recommend further relief.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected by amending Block 28 (Narrative Reason for
Separation) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from
Active Duty, issued on 24 August 2000, to reflect “Attend School Full Time
in an Officer Training Program.”
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 00-03113
in Executive Session on 19 March 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Frederick R. Beaman, III Panel Chair
Mr. Clarence D. Long, III, Member
Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Nov 00, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 4 Jan 01.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 19 Jan 01.
Exhibit E. Applicant, dated 15 Feb 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit F. Applicant, AFROTC/RRUE, dated 24 Jul 01.
Exhibit G. Applicant, SAF/MIBR, dated 3 Aug 01.
FREDERICK R. BEAMAN, III
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 00-03113
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
APPLICANT, be corrected by amending Block 28 (Narrative Reason for
Separation) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from
Active Duty, issued on 24 August 2000, to reflect “Attend School Full Time
in an Officer Training Program.”
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-02517
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that he agrees with AFPC’s summary of his basis for request except for their final statement, “…there was a delay in signing the required paperwork needed to make the correction to his DIEUS.” He states, actually, there was an AFROTC-induced delay in processing his four-year scholarship award delaying his...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00623
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 3 September 1993, the applicant signed an AF Form 1056, Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) Contract. Congress purposely made ROTC graduates ineligible for the MGIB in its effort to prevent individuals from receiving “double” benefits. She further indicates if she received scholarship monies she would have received between $6,000.00 and $12,000.00 per year.
In order to be discharged, she had to be legally and properly discharged. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit K. The Chief, General Law Division, HQ USAF/JAG, also reviewed the case and indicates applicant's contention that the discharge order was not effective until 27 June 1993 should be rejected because she had sufficient constructive knowledge of her discharge to make it effective 11 June 1993. Air Force.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02063
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: By letter, dated 5 Jul 05, the applicant provided documentation regarding verification of his possible entitlements due to the loss of his AFROTC Scholarship, which is attached at Exhibit L. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFOATS/JA indicated that according to the Base Educators Guide, dated 1 Mar 00, to be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02743
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02743 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. AFROTC records indicate that he received POCI funds, which was confirmed in his request as well. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01135
In support of her appeal, applicant provides a letter from her detachment stating that she disclosed her illness and medications before attending field training, a letter from her psychiatrist, copy of an e-mail message, and a letter from her AFROTC commander. On 15 Jan 03, a DD Form 785 was completed disenrolling the applicant from the AFROTC program effective 31 Mar 03 for medical disqualification by reason of bi-polar depression and failure to maintain military retention standards. We...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01923
d. The applicant admitted to deceiving the Commander of the AFROTC Detachment (Det) and a professor by lying about a grade change. On 26 Jan 04, the AFROTC Det commander requested from HQ AFROTC the applicant be investigated for disenrollment. However, the captains stated the applicant arrived at about 1230 on 12 Nov 03 and within 15 to 20 minutes of the interview began to tell the truth about her actions on the PFT, the failed summer course, being signed into LLAB, and lying to the AFROTC...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03641
The applicant applied for an HPSP scholarship and it was denied. The JA advisory opinion states that applicant simply had no reasonable basis to believe he was entitled to an HPSP scholarship. However, the applicant had a firm basis to believe he was contracted under the HPSP given the Air Force via the commanding officer of the AFROTC program, believed there was a binding contract, thus signing a letter stating the applicant was guaranteed a HPSP scholarship. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03113
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03113 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 Apr 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The separation program designator (SPD) be changed on her DD Form 214 so she will be eligible for Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) benefits. ...
c. In reference to the applicant’s third allegation, he does not specify any particular error that was made. Therefore, they recommend that no change be made to applicant’s military records. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.