AFBCMR 01-02019
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR
SUBJECT: XXXXXXX SSAN:
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the
recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the
basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an
error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-
2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the
accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive
Director or his designee.
Members of the Board Mr. Douglas J. Heady, Ms. Diana Arnold, and Mr.
Laurence M. Groner considered this application on 23 July 2001.
DOUGLAS J. HEADY
Panel Chair
Attachment:
Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, undated
AFBCMR01-02019
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code
and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the
above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of
Military Records is announced, and it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXXX, , be corrected to show that he was honorably
discharged on 23 July 1999, and on 24 July 1999, he reenlisted in the
Regular Air Force for a period of two (2) years.
DONNA PITTENGER
Chief Examiner
Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records
AFBCMR 99-00096 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02019
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Michael J. NOVEL Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 7 Jul 05 AFBCMR BC-2005-02019 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00424 INDEX CODE: 121.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Six days of lost leave be restored. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Field Activities Division, HQ AFPC/DPSF, reviewed this application and states that applicant had 50 days...
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 18 February 2000, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. It appears that the citation for his MSM, 1OLC was not in his Senior NCO Selection Folder when reviewed by the Evaluation Board. However, AFI 36-2502, Airman Promotion Program, Table 2.5, Rule 4,...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Hawaii National Guard on 24 July 1990, in the grade airman basic for four years. On 6 March 1992, applicant was promoted to the grade of senior airman. JOE G. LINEBERGER Director Air Force Review Boards Agency AFBCMR 98-01672 MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE REVIEW BOARDS AGENCY, SAF/MIB SUBJECT: Minority Report on BCMR Case of APPLICANT I am not in agreement with the majority...
This meant that those members taking the advance pay did not have to repay one month’s pay. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF DFAS EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and asserts his situation is no different than others who have received one month’s basic pay due to losses suffered from Hurricane Andrew. We are aware that many members assigned to Homestead Air Force Base during the Hurricane Andrew devastation received...
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, is of the opinion that, in order to correct an injustice of improperly labeling the applicant’s disorder, the applicant’s request for change of reason for discharge should be granted. The applicant was given an entry level separation with uncharacterized service after a mental health evaluation had determined that he suffered from an adjustment disorder of such...
On 9 November 1999, applicant’s Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) entitlement expired when he reached 10 years of service. He has provided no evidence to substantiate error or injustice nor inconsistencies in the application of the Air Force’s early reenlistment policies. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the evaluation and...
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a personal statement, character statements, a college acceptance letter, a statement from a clinical psychologist, his student training report and performance summary, an outprocessing checklist dated 13 Jan 98, a mental health evaluation dated 26 Jan 98, the commander’s memo directing a mental evaluation dated 27 Jan 98, the disenrollment action dated 6 Feb 98 and signed by the commander on 9 Feb 98, a notification letter dated 6 Feb 98, and...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02928 INDEX CODE: 121.03 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes Applicant requests thirteen (13) days of leave be restored to his current leave balance. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response...