RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01568
INDEX NUMBER: 131.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be granted promotion consideration to lieutenant colonel by Special
Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year (CY) 1999A Lieutenant
Colonel Selection Board with the letter he previously wrote to the
CY99A board withdrawn.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The letter he wrote to the board cast his record as a resident graduate
of Air Command and Staff College (ACSC) in a different light from other
resident graduates. This was obvious from his non-select counseling
when the counselor told him “you still didn’t sit in the classroom for
10 months.”
His 1999 resident completion date made his records transparent to the
selection board and caused them to question how he could have a
completion date of 1999 when the 1999 class had not yet graduated.
This caused board members to look for a training report and not find
one.
His tour at ACSC was the result of an agreement with the Air Force to
award him resident credit, not faculty credit, or nonresident credit.
He was never informed before he was hired as an ACSC faculty member
that he would have to give up his candidacy for resident PME. He
fulfilled his end of the bargain in good faith at a great cost. He has
not received “resident credit” and explaining program details casts his
records in doubt.
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant’s Total Active Federal Military Service Date is 28 Feb
83. The applicant was considered but not selected for promotion to
lieutenant colonel by the CY99A promotion selection board. On 9 Nov
00, the AFBCMR granted the applicant promotion consideration by SSB for
the CY99A promotion board due to an error in his duty title. The Board
denied the applicant’s request to direct the SSB to score all records
with the intermediate service school (ISS) designator “residence” the
same (See Record of Proceeding at Exhibit B). The applicant was
considered for promotion by SSB on 22 Jan 01 and not selected.
_______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Promotion, Evaluation & Recognition Division, evaluated the
application and recommends denial of the applicant’s request.
The applicant admits that once he discovered the true error on his
Officer Selection Brief (OSB) and advised the SSB office of the
corrected data, he should have asked that his letter to the board be
removed. Instead, applicant allowed the letter to meet the SSB. The
applicant had sufficient time once the record was corrected to request
his letter be withdrawn.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit c.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant responded to the Air Force evaluation. The applicant
reiterated that he has not received the benefit of being a resident
graduate of ACSC as promised when he was recruited as an ACSC
instructor. The applicant attached additional letters of support for
his appeal. He also emphasizes that he came from a military family and
asks for the opportunity to continue serving in the next grade.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the
primary basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the
victim of an error or injustice. We are not persuaded that the
applicant’s letter to the president of the selection board is the
overriding reason for his nonselection. The decision to write the
selection board president was a judgement call made entirely by the
applicant. We do not believe that it is fair or appropriate to provide
the applicant further promotion consideration based on conjecture.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 20 September 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Teddy L. Houston, Panel Chair
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member
Mr. Roger E. Willmeth, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 May 01.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPP, dated 24 Jul 01.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 27 Jul 01.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 23 Aug 01.
TEDDY L. HOUSTON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2001 | BC-2001-01568
The applicant was considered but not selected for promotion to lieutenant colonel by the CY99A promotion selection board. The applicant had sufficient time once the record was corrected to request his letter be withdrawn. _______________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 20 September 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Mr. Teddy L. Houston, Panel Chair Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr.,...
The Academic Education section on the OSB reviewed by the CY99A Colonel Selection Board be corrected to show Virginia Military Institute 1978 rather than “UNK.” 4. The applicant’s contentions concerning information missing from his OSB before the CY99A Colonel Selection Board are duly noted. Furthermore, neither the information concerning where and when he received his bachelor’s degree, nor the command level for his current assignment, was reflected on his two previous OSBs, which were...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03611
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03611 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Record for the Calendar Year 1999A (CY99A) Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board be corrected to include the Air Medal he was awarded for the period 16 January 1991 to 4 February 1991....
He had less than two years eligibility to complete ACSC prior to consideration for LTC IPZ in Apr 99, whereas his peers had at least four and one-half years. He did complete ACSC in Nov 99 in time for the CY99B board’s consideration. Although the applicant did not raise this issue, we believe his not having sufficient time to build a performance record as a major before being considered IPZ for LTC may have contributed to his nonselection.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02553
His Officer Preselection Brief (OPB), dated 24 September 2001, reflected three MSMs. DPPPOO states that although the applicant’s Officer Preselection Brief (OPB) did not reflect award of the MSM (3OLC), the Officer Selection Brief (OSB) was updated to reflect the award and a copy of the citation was filed in the Officer Selection Record for the board to review. Although the applicant’s OPB did not reflect the award of the MSM (3OLC), it appears that that the award was shown on his OSB and...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02359
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her Officer Selection Brief (OSB) used during the CY02A board was in error in that an erroneous date of separation (DOS) was present; that the error was discovered by the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) after she was not selected for promotion; and, that her record was considered by an SSB on 6 May 02 with this correction made, but with no opportunity for her to examine the record for other errors...
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded that he does not allege there are significant errors in his record. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that he should be promoted to LTC by the correction of records process. The applicant has not submitted persuasive evidence that he was not...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00807
2 The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C through E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPF recommends an SSB be convened and the applicant’s record be competed for an in-residence seat against officers actually selected for ISS during his eligibility window. The complete DPSID evaluation is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-03270
However, DPPPO recommends denial for the applicant’s request to reflect completion of SOS in residence, completion of ACSC in residence, selection for a Regular commission, and an award of an end of tour decoration for his assignment to Korea. All members voted to deny correcting the records to reflect the applicant’s completion of ACSC, a Regular commission, and an end of tour decoration for his assignment to Korea. His Officer Selection Briefs prepared for the Calendar Year 2005 (CY05)...
The most current duty assignment entry on the CY99A OSB was changed to “16 Jul 99, Deputy Chief, Combat Forces Division.” (A copy of the corrected Officer Selection Brief (OSB) reviewed by the CY99A SSB is provided as an attachment to Exhibit C.) The applicant was not selected by the SSBs. A complete copy of his response, with 8 attachments, is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Assignment Procedures &...