Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101209
Original file (0101209.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NO.:  01-01209
                                   INDEX CODE:  107.00


                             COUNSEL:  NONE

                             HEARING DESIRED:  NO


The applicant requests he be promoted  effective  upon  his  retirement,  he
receive the Armed Forces  Reserve  Medal  (AFRM),  and  he  be  awarded  the
Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC).  The applicant's submission is at  Exhibit
A.

Examiner’s note:  It was determined  that  applicant  was  entitled  to  the
AFRM.  He has been provided the medal set by the appropriate agency.

The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and  provided
an advisory opinion to the Board  recommending  the  application  be  denied
(Exhibit C).  The advisory  opinion  was  forwarded  to  the  applicant  for
review and response (Exhibit D).  As of this date, this office has  received
no response.

After  careful  consideration  of  applicant's  request  and  the  available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or  injustice  to
warrant corrective action.  The facts and opinions stated  in  the  advisory
opinion appear to be based on the evidence  of  record  and  have  not  been
rebutted by applicant.  Absent  persuasive  evidence  applicant  was  denied
rights to which entitled, appropriate  regulations  were  not  followed,  or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find  no  basis  to  disturb  the
existing record.

Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.


The  Board  staff  is  directed  to  inform  applicant  of  this   decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will  only
be reconsidered upon the presentation of new  relevant  evidence  which  was
not available at the time the application was filed.

Members of the Board Mr. John L. Robuck,  Mr.  Edward  C.  Parker,  and  Mr.
Billy C. Baxter, considered this application on 21  Aug  01,  in  accordance
with the provisions of Air  Force  Instruction  36-2603  and  the  governing
statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.





                                                   Panel Chair

Exhibits:

A.  Applicant's DD Form 149, w/atchs
B.  Available Master Personnel Records
C.  Advisory Opinion
D.  AFBCMR Letter Forwarding Advisory Opinion

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101514

    Original file (0101514.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0100913

    Original file (0100913.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02677

    Original file (BC-2005-02677.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02677 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 29 FEB 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM), the Air Reserves Forces Meritorious Service Medal (ARFMSM), the Air Force Good Conduct Medal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0102237

    Original file (0102237.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002368

    Original file (0002368.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101607

    Original file (0101607.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101790

    Original file (0101790.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01790 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect he was awarded an Air Force Commendation Medal. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's requests and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0100343

    Original file (0100343.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's requests and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the request for the PH (1OLC) and the PUC be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not available at the time the application was filed.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0100397

    Original file (0100397.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). PHILIP SHEUERMAN Panel Chair Exhibits: A.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101698

    Original file (0101698.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s records were administratively corrected by the Air Force Personnel Center to reflect award of the Distinguished Flying Cross and Air Force Commendation Medal. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied with respect to the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and Vietnam Cross of Gallantry with Palm (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review...