RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00965
INDEX CODE: 121.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Twenty-five (25) days of leave be added to his leave account
commencing 1 October 1999.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
In July of 1996 he was placed on appellate leave following a court-
martial conviction. The case was overturned in March 1999. He was
brought back to duty in August 1999. Because of this he could not
take the leave earned.
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a personal statement and
documentation relating to the matter.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 23 July 1975.
In July of 1996, he was placed on appellate leave after a courts-
martial conviction. On 16 November 1996, applicant applied for
retirement in lieu of a bad conduct discharge, but the Secretary of
the Air Force declined to accept the application. A General Court-
Martial Order was issued and the sentence was approved except for the
bad conduct discharge. Applicant was placed on leave pending
completion of the appellate review of the conviction. On 9 March
1999, applicant’s conviction by General Court-Martial was set aside.
A rehearing was found to be impractical and the charge(s) were
dismissed. The case was overturned in March 1999. A decision was not
made to bring him back to duty until August 1999. He was returned to
active duty from appellate review leave. On 30 August 1999, he
applied for retirement to be effective 1 January 2000, which was his
high year of tenure (HYT) of 24 years of active service for master
sergeant. His application for retirement to be effective 1
January 2000 was approved on 3 September 1999.
The applicant departed on terminal leave on 26 September 1999 with a
leave balance of 97 days. He was brought back on active duty for the
sole purpose of out processing for retirement. He was unable to take
his leave because he did not have sufficient time to use the leave
that was restored to his account before 1 October 2000.
The applicant had 85.0 days of leave at the end of Fiscal Year 1999.
On 1 October 2000, he lost 25.0 days because Title 10 USC 701
prohibits members from carrying more than 60 days into the next fiscal
year.
Applicant retired from active duty on 31 December 1999. He served 24
years 1 month and 21 days of active service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Field Operations Branch, AFPC/DPSFM, reviewed the
application and states that the member should receive relief. The
retirement date should be adjusted to accommodate reimbursement for
all pay and allowances.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
The Retirement Programs & Policy Section, AFPC/DPPRRP, reviewed the
application and states that there are no provisions to extend an
approved retirement for the sole purpose to be paid for accrued leave
or to take terminal leave.
Applicant retired on the maximum HYT date authorized for MSgts. There
are no provisions of policy or regulation that allow an involuntary
separation date to be extended due to a desire for terminal leave
after the established HYT date. Rather, the only provisions by
regulation that allow extensions to these involuntary separation dates
are for extreme hardship (not common to other retiring members with
documented justification) or for the needs of the Air Force (as
documented and justified by commanders). Additionally, there are
provisions by regulation that allow extension of the maximum HYT date
by placing member on medical hold. To allow an extension of an
involuntary separation date (due to maximum HYT) for purposes of using
leave would be patently unfair to all the remaining enlisted members
retiring/separating on their HYT date who do not have this option
available to them. Therefore, they recommend denial of applicant’s
request.
A complete copy of their evaluation, with attachments, is attached at
Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that there
seems to be some misconception on what he is asking for from the
Board. He was not told about the lost days of leave until after he
had taken them and received his pay and allowances. When he departed
on leave everything was correct and proper. He’s not asking that his
retirement date be changed or for any other finances be paid to him.
All he’s asking for is that the 25 days of leave be restored so that
he does not have to continue to repay the government for them. He did
as he was told by the Air Force and now he’s having to struggle to pay
for this when it was out of his control. He states, if there is a way
to restore the leave administratively and at no cost to the government
he would greatly appreciate it.
A copy of applicant’s response is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. After reviewing the
evidence of record, we believe that the applicant was prevented from
using his leave through no fault of his own. In view of the fact that
his court-martial conviction was set aside, we believe the applicant
should have been provided the opportunity to use his leave. In
addition, we believe that the applicant should have been counseled
concerning the amount of leave he had to use when he departed on
terminal leave in September 1999. As the record now stands applicant
has been charged 25 days of excess leave, which under the
circumstances of this case, is unjust. Therefore, we recommend his
records be corrected to the extend indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that twenty-five (25) days
of leave were added to his leave account commencing 1 October
1999 and he was in regular, rather than excess, leave status during
the period 6 December 1999 through 31 December 1999.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 16 August 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Panel Chair
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member
Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Mar 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSFM, dated 18 May 01.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRRP, dated 21 Jun 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 29 Jun 01.
Exhibit F. Applicant’s Response, undated.
JACKSON A. HAUSLEIN
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 01-00965
INDEX CODE: 121.00
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that twenty-five (25.0) days
of leave were added to his leave account commencing 1 October 1999 and
he was in regular, rather than excess, leave status during the period
6 December 1999 through 31 December 1999.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Field Operations Branch, AFPC/DPSFM, reviewed the application and states that in accordance with Title 10 USC 701, members cannot sell more than a cumulative total of 60 days leave during a military career. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 5 October 2000, for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E). At the time he applied for retirement in May 1999, to be effective 1 June 2000, his medical condition had not yet been diagnosed. In view of the above, we recommend that the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00876 INDEX CODE 121.01 121.03 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed for all leave, pay, and allowances for 28 days charged as excess leave. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSFM, dated 21 May 01, w/atchs. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 1 Jun 01.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02792
The DPSFM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRRP recommends approval based on the fact that he sold back 28 days of leave based on information provided to him by his Financial Service Office. Since applicant had requested a retirement date of 1 Sep 02, we do not believe that a change in his retirement is warranted. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2003-02792 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction...
Since we are precluded by Title 37, Section 501, from granting the applicant’s request as stated, an alternate form of records correction is required. Pursuant to our request, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service computed the amount of money the applicant would receive for a fictitious temporary duty equating to the dollar value of 21 days’ leave at his grade and rank. LAWRENCE R. LEEHY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPSFM, dtd 27 Jun 02, w/Atch Ltr, AFPC/DPPRRP, dtd 23 Jul 02,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02090
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRRP also recommends that the applicant be compensated for five days of leave. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Oct 02 for review and comment within 30 days. The Board agrees with the recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility to...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01328 INDEX CODE: 121.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Twenty-four days of leave be reinstated to his leave account. The applicant provided an AF Form 1089, which the member completes at the time of reenlistment. ...
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Field Operations Branch, AFPC/DPSFM, indicated the applicant stated he did not elect to sell any leave upon his reenlistment on 18 Oct 99 but lost the leave after payment was erroneously made for 37 days leave. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be...
AFBCMR 01-00133 INDEX NUMBER: 121.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AFBCMR 01-00130 INDEX NUMBER: 121.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...