RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03258
INDEX NUMBER: 104.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that her indebtedness to the government as a
result of her resignation from the United States Air Force Academy
(USAFA) be remitted. She states she did not resign voluntarily but
was forced to resign due to unwelcomed sexual advances from her
squadron commander. As a result, she will not be forced to pay for
the first two years of her Academy education but agrees to pay for
one semester. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and
provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant. Absent
persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which entitled,
appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards
were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence, which was not available at the time the application was
filed.
Members of the Board, Mr. Robert W. Zook, Ms. Brenda L. Romine, and
Ms. Marcia J. Bachman, considered this application on 1 May 2001,
in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603
and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
ROBERT W. ZOOK
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149, dtd 1 Dec 2000
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion, w/atchs
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: While completing the required documents to be released from active duty in 1997, she was unaware as to the meaning of “resigning her commission” and being released from active duty. While she was requesting separation from active duty, she completed paperwork for a reserve assignment. Based on the applicant’s...
Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Applicant claims to have continued his Air Force career with the expectation he would be credited with these four years at the Academy upon his retirement from the Air Force. A corrected SOS was prepared at a dated as 18 Jan a instead of 18 Jan 74. later date...
Any legal action to collect the debt is time-barred under 28 USC 2415. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that at the time of her discharge from the Air Force Academy, the Secretary of the Air Force found that under the particular circumstances of her case, her resignation was not voluntary within the meaning of Title 10,...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion DEPARTMENT O F THE A I R FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS MAR 1 8 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCLDPPRS 550 C Street West Ste 11 Randolph AFB TX 78150-4713 SUBJECT: Application for...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.