Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-01186
Original file (BC-1998-01186.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  98-01186
            INDEX CODE:  A68.00

            COUNSEL:  NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT
                                           OF VETERANS AFFAIR

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

Applicant requests that his  bad  conduct  discharge  be  upgraded  to
honorable or general.  Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.

Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau  of  Investigation
(FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an  investigative  report  which  is
attached at Exhibit C.

The appropriate Air Force office  evaluated  applicant's  request  and
provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application
be denied (Exhibit D).  The advisory  opinion  was  forwarded  to  the
applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). As  of  this  date,  no
response has been received by this office.

After careful consideration of applicant's request and  the  available
evidence  of  record,  we  find  insufficient  evidence  of  error  or
injustice to warrant corrective action.  The facts and opinions stated
in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence  of  record
and have not been rebutted by applicant.  Absent  persuasive  evidence
applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations
were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we  find
no basis to disturb the existing record.

Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.

The Board staff is directed to  inform  applicant  of  this  decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of  new  relevant  evidence
which was not reasonably available at the  time  the  application  was
filed.

Members of the Board Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Mr.  Terry  A.  Yonkers,
and Ms. Peggy E. Gordon considered this application on 18  Feb  99  in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force  Instruction  36-2603  and
the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.




                                    RICHARD A. PETERSON
                                    Panel Chair

Exhibits:

A.  Applicant's DD Form 149
B.  Available Master Personnel Records
C.  FBI Report
D.  Advisory Opinion
E.  SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0003040

    Original file (0003040.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit E. The FBI report was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit F). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801781

    Original file (9801781.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). After careful consideration of applicant's...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801186

    Original file (9801186.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair Exhibits: A.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9801186

    Original file (9801186.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair Exhibits: A.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9803108

    Original file (9803108.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9803288

    Original file (9803288.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, D. C., provided a copy of an investigation report, which is attached at Exhibit C. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair Exhibits: A.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900220

    Original file (9900220.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1993-00762A

    Original file (BC-1993-00762A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E. In an application, dated 15 November 1997, the applicant requested reconsideration of his application on the merits. Applicant’s submission is attached at Exhibit F. The application has been reopened, and forwarded to the Board for reconsideration on the merits of the case. It appears that responsible officials applied appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find persuasive evidence that pertinent...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9300762A

    Original file (9300762A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E. In an application, dated 15 November 1997, the applicant requested reconsideration of his application on the merits. Applicant’s submission is attached at Exhibit F. The application has been reopened, and forwarded to the Board for reconsideration on the merits of the case. It appears that responsible officials applied appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find persuasive evidence that pertinent...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0003365

    Original file (0003365.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, stated that the applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. Since his discharge occurred over 48 years ago and considering he was only 19...