RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-03161
INDEX CODE:110.00
APPLICANT COUNSEL: NONE
SSN HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests his discharge be upgraded. Applicant's submission
is at Exhibit A.
Applicant's military personnel records were destroyed by fire in 1973.
Therefore, the facts surrounding his separation from the Air Force
cannot be verified.
After careful consideration of applicant's request, we note that there
are no records to review and applicant has not provided documentation
revealing the circumstances of his discharge. Based on the
presumption of regularity in the conduct of government affairs and
without evidence to the contrary, we must assume that the applicant's
discharge was proper and in compliance with appropriate directives.
Therefore, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this
application.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not available at the time the application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. David W. Mulgrew, Mr. Christopher Carey, and
Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt considered this application on 27 June
2000 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-
2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
DAVID W. MULGREW
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Record
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request for upgrade of his general discharge on 7 Dec 00. The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit B). DAVID W. MULGREW Panel Chair Exhibits: A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant’s request concerning his disability retirement and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending denial (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for upgrade of his discharge on 27 Jun 97. The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The decision of the AFDRB appears to be based on the evidence of record and has not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 29 October 1997. The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AUG 1 4 5998 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00405 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that he be given credit for two additional missions. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion DEPARTMENT O F THE AIR...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant’s request concerning his administrative separation and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending denial (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.