RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 01-01030 (Case 2)
INDEX CODE: 100.03
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be
upgraded. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
Applicant's military personnel records are unavailable. Therefore,
the facts surrounding his separation from the Air Force cannot be
verified.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's
request for upgrade of his general discharge on 7 Dec 00. The AFDRB
Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit
B). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit D.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the limited
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error
or injustice to warrant corrective action. Based upon the presumption
of regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs and without
evidence to the contrary, we must assume that the applicant's
discharge was proper and in compliance with appropriate directives.
Therefore, based on the limited available evidence of record, we find
no basis upon which to favorably consider this application. However,
should the applicant submit documents surrounding his Air Force
service and the circumstances of his discharge, the Board may be
willing to reconsider his appeal.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not reasonably available at the time the application was
filed.
Members of the Board Mr. David W. Mulgrew, Mr. Jay H. Jordan, and Mr.
William E. Edwards considered this application on 14 November 2001 and
14 December 2001 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
DAVID W. MULGREW
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. AFDRB Brief
C. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding AFDRB Brief
D. Applicant’s Response
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant’ request on 12 May 1999. The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for upgrade of his discharge on 27 Jun 97. The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The decision of the AFDRB appears to be based on the evidence of record and has not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 29 October 1997. The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 24 September 1999. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for upgrade of his discharge (Exhibit C). The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 21 January 1999 (Exhibit C). The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02800
Applicant's request to have his RE code changed was denied by the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) on 8 Aug 75. After reviewing the evidence of record, we are unpersuaded that the applicant’s records are in error or that he has been the victim of an injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, AFDRB Hearing Record, dated 8 Aug 75.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 3 Dec 99 (Exhibit C). The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. On 15 Jun 5 1, the discharge authority directed that applicant be discharged under the provisions of...
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. (Atch 1-3) Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached. Instead of the appointed counsel, you may have another, if the lawyer you request is in the active military service and is reasonably available as determined according to AFI 5 1-201.