ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02286
INDEX CODE: 100.10
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
RESUME OF CASE:
In an application, dated 14 August 1998, the applicant requested his
selection for retraining be nullified; he be returned to Air Force
Specialty Code (AFSC) 3E4X1; he be promoted to the grade of master sergeant
effective and with date of rank as if selected by the 98E7 promotion cycle;
and he be assigned to the XXX Civil Engineering Squadron (CES), at XXXX
AFB.
On 29 June 1999, the Board considered and granted the applicant’s requests
(Exhibits A through F).
In a letter, dated 8 December 1999, the applicant requests assignment to
the XXXX CES at XXXX AFB. In support of his request, applicant submits
statements from the XXX CES Deputy Chief, Operations Flight and the XXXX
CES Chief of Operations, indicating there is currently a surplus and
unavailability of an E-7 position at XXXX AFB, and an urgent need for
individuals within his career field at XXXXX AFB. The applicant’s complete
submission is attached at Exhibit G.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. A majority of the Board
previously determined the process in which the applicant was selected for
retraining was tainted. As such, the majority of the Board recommended and
the Director, Air Force Review Boards Agency approved, the correction of
the applicant’s records to show that he was not selected for retraining;
remained in Air Force Specialty Code 3E4X1; was promoted to the grade of
master sergeant, effective and with date of rank (DOR) of 1 October 1998;
and was reassigned to the XXXX Civil Engineering Squadron, XXXX AFB, XXXX.
The applicant now requests that he be reassigned to the XXXX CES at XXXX
AFB, XXXX, and submits statements from the XXXX CES Deputy Chief,
Operations Flight, and the XXXX CES Chief of Operations. Based on these
statements it appears there is a surplus and unavailability of an E-7
position at XXXX AFB, but an urgent need for qualified individuals within
his career field at XXXX AFB. In view of this, and given the previous
decision by this Board, we believe that equity dictates that applicant be
provided the requested relief. Therefore, we recommend his records be
corrected to the extent indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that his request for assignment to the
XXXX Civil Engineering Squadron, XXXX AFB, XXXX, was approved by competent
authority.
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 12 October 2000, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
Mr. Edward C. Koenig, III, Member
Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibits A-F. Record of Proceedings, dated 21 Sep 99, w/atchs.
Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant, dated 8 Dec 99, w/atchs.
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
Panel Chair
In a letter, dated 8 December 1999, the applicant requests assignment to the XXXX CES at XXXX AFB. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that his request for assignment to the XXXX Civil Engineering Squadron, XXXX AFB, XXXX, was approved by competent authority. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibits A-F. Record of Proceedings, dated 21 Sep 99, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00458
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00458 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: It appears the applicant is requesting he be considered for promotion to major by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the calendar year 2002B (CY02B) Central Major Selection Board with the following...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02153
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number...
Current Air Force promotion policy dictates that before a decoration is credited for a specific promotion cycle, the closeout date must be on or before the Promotion Eligibility Cutoff Date (PECD), and the date of the DÉCOR-6, Recommendation for Decoration Printout (RDP) must be before the date of selections for the cycle in question. He had not provided any documentation showing that he had worked his request through administrative channels and failed to provide additional documentation as...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03735
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03735 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2C,” “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge: or entry level separation without characterization of service,” be changed to RE Code...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01790
By memorandum dated 5 Apr 03, the applicant amended the above request to request that the Board approve replacement of his original PRFs with revised PRFs, signed by his senior rater, for the Calendar Year (CY) 1999B (99B) and CY00A Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Boards. Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the evaluations prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force found at Exhibits C, D, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00693
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00693 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to major by a special selection board (SSB) for the Calendar Year (CY) 2002B Central Major Selection Board with the Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered on him for...
He be reassigned to Extended Active Duty (EAD) as a statutory tour officer to complete 2 years, and 3 months of active duty for completion of 20 years for retirement. The applicant notes that the policy at the time he was renewed for a second tour was that a statutory officer would be continued for a 20-year retirement if they had excellent performance and 12 to 14 years of active duty. However, should the Board elect to provide the applicant relief, they recommend the applicant’s record...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-00242
He be reassigned to Extended Active Duty (EAD) as a statutory tour officer to complete 2 years, and 3 months of active duty for completion of 20 years for retirement. The applicant notes that the policy at the time he was renewed for a second tour was that a statutory officer would be continued for a 20-year retirement if they had excellent performance and 12 to 14 years of active duty. However, should the Board elect to provide the applicant relief, they recommend the applicant’s record...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01437
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01437 INDEX CODE: 131.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be promoted from staff sergeant to technical sergeant. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ANG/DPPI notes...