RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02479
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his under other than honorable conditions discharge
be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) or an honorable
discharge. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
Applicant's military personnel records were destroyed by fire in 1973.
Therefore, the facts surrounding his separation from the Air Force cannot
be verified. However, the reconstructed military records that are
available are attached at Exhibit B.
After careful consideration of applicant’s request, we note that there are
limited records available for review and applicant has not provided
documentation revealing the circumstances of his discharge. Therefore, due
to the lack of records upon which to determine whether or not applicant’s
separation was appropriate. However, based on the presumption of
regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs and without evidence to
the contrary, we must assume that the applicant’s discharge was proper and
in compliance with appropriate directives. Therefore, we find no basis
upon which to favorably consider this application.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only
be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence, which was
not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Mr. William E. Edwards, and Ms.
Brenda L. Romine considered this application on 30 November 2000 in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and the
governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
After careful consideration of applicant’s request, we note that there are no records available for review and applicant has not provided documentation revealing the circumstances of his discharge. The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision. VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ Panel Chair Exhibits: A.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01826 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that his discharge be upgraded to honorable. The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision. Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and application was filed.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. Applicant’s request for the Last Duty Assignment and Major Command be changed to read 523rd AF Band has been administratively corrected by the appropriate Air Force. With respect to his request that his general (under honorable conditions) discharge be changed to honorable, the appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded the applicant’s discharge to general on 12 September 1978. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the AFDRB brief appear to be based on the evidence of record and their basis for not upgrading the discharge to honorable has not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01014 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: MICHAEL J. CLOONAN HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that his discharge be upgraded to honorable. The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant...