RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01265
INDEX NUMBER: 100.03
COUNSEL: AMERICAN LEGION
HEARING DESIRED: YES
Applicant requests that his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2C
be changed. (Examiner’s Note: RE-2C denotes involuntarily separated
under the provisions of AFR 39-10 with an honorable discharge.)
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The facts surrounding his separation from the Air Force are unknown
inasmuch as no military records were available.
Applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from
Active Duty, reflects that his service characterization was upgraded
to honorable by the Air Force Discharge Review Board effective
20 December 1990 and that the narrative reason for separation was
changed from Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions to
Convenience of the Government.
After careful consideration of applicant's request, we found
insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. Based upon the presumption
of regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs and without
evidence to the contrary, we must assume that the RE Code issued in
conjunction with applicant’s involuntary separation was proper and in
compliance with appropriate directives. Therefore, we find no basis
upon which to favorably consider this application.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not reasonably available at the time the application was
filed.
Members of the Board, Messrs. Henry Romo Jr., Steven A. Shaw, and
Timothy A. Beyland, considered this application on 22 April 1999 in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603 and
the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
HENRY ROMO JR.
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
E. Counsel's Response
Applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflects that his service characterization was upgraded to honorable by the Air Force Discharge Review Board effective 20 December 1990 and that the narrative reason for separation was changed from Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions to Convenience of the Government. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01476 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect that at the time of his discharge, he was serving in the grade of sergeant, and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed. Accordingly, applicant's requests are denied. HENRY ROMO, JR. Panel Chair Exhibits: A.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01087 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from 2P to a favorable code. Therefore, recommend his record be corrected accordingly. Exhibit B.
He was not discharged because of the failure. Based on applicant’s failure in his CDC’s and no record of misconduct, the SJA recommended that the applicant be separated from the Air Force with an honorable discharge without probation and rehabilitation. We therefore agree with the recommendations of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden that he has suffered either an error or an injustice.
He was not discharged because of the failure. Based on applicant’s failure in his CDC’s and no record of misconduct, the SJA recommended that the applicant be separated from the Air Force with an honorable discharge without probation and rehabilitation. We therefore agree with the recommendations of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden that he has suffered either an error or an injustice.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03182 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) and separation codes be changed to allow her to enlist in the Coast Guard. Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. A complete copy of the AFDRB brief is attached at Exhibit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02965 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to allow eligibility to reenter the Air Force. He requests additional information be provided concerning his discharge. A complete copy of this response is appended...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03400 INDEX CODES: 100.06, 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, reviewed this...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.