RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00446
INDEX CODE: 107
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Report of Separation From the Armed Forces of the
United States, be corrected to reflect the award of the Air Medal.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He received the Air Medal for 19 combat missions he flew over Korea.
Applicant states that all combat veterans were eligible for a six-
month early discharge. As the processing room was crowded and clerks
were busy, he believes this was the cause for the oversight.
In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of the DD Form
214 and a Letter of Accomplishments, dated 12 December 1952, which
states in part that the applicant had flown 19 combat missions in the
Korean theater.
Applicant’s submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
It appears that applicant’s military personnel records were destroyed
by fire in 1973 at the National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis,
Missouri. However, the available records reflect that applicant
enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 27 March 1950 in the grade of
private. He was subsequently honorably discharged on 14 September
1953 in the grade of staff sergeant. He served 3 years 5 months and
18 days of active service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Recognition Programs Branch, Promotions, Evaluation & Recognition
Division, HQ AFPC/DPPPRA, states that the applicant served on active
duty 27 March 1950 to 14 September 1953 and was stationed on Okinawa
from 12 June 1952 to 9 December 1952. He provided a picture of
himself receiving the Air Medal but does not have any other
documentation to verify this decoration. On 7 May 1998, HQ
AFPC/DPPPRA requested the Historical Research Center at Maxwell Air
Force Base, Alabama to search their files for a copy of the orders.
However, they were unable to locate a copy of any orders awarding the
applicant any decorations.
Since the applicant’s records were destroyed by fire in 1973, there
are no documents regarding his service, except those he has provided.
Without a copy of the orders, they cannot verify that the applicant
was recommended for or awarded the Air Medal. A photograph in a
newspaper is not considered sufficient justification to comply with
the applicant’s request. They recommend the applicant’s request be
denied.
A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
29 June 1998 for review and response. A copy of the applicant’s
response, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice warranting relief. After
reviewing the limited military personnel records and the applicant’s
submission, it appears that he was awarded the Air Medal. Although
there is no evidence in the available military record or in
applicant’s submission, i.e., an order or citation for the award in
question to indicate he was awarded this decoration, we note that the
applicant served in Korea and apparently flew at least 19 combat
missions. It appears that individuals who flew a minimum of 10 combat
missions during the contested time period were entitled to an Air
Medal. Further, we also note the official photograph of the applicant
receiving the award from his superior officer. In view of the above
and in an effort to offset an injustice to the applicant, we recommend
his records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
_______________________________________________________________________
_____________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the DD Form 214,
Report of Separation From the Armed Forces of the United States, Item
27., Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and
Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, be amended by adding: “Air
Medal.”
_______________________________________________________________________
_____________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 2 February 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Michael P. Higgins, Panel Chair
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Member
Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Feb 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPRA, dated 10 Jun 98.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 29 Jun 98.
Exhibit E. Applicant’s Letter, dated 4 Jul 98.
MICHAEL P. HIGGINS
Panel Chair
INDEX CODE: 107
AFBCMR 98-00446
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the DD Form 214,
Report of Separation From the Armed Forces of the United States, Item
27, Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign
Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, be, and hereby is, amended by adding:
“Air Medal.”
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Without a copy of the orders, they cannot verify that the applicant was recommended for or awarded the Air Medal. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 29 June 1998 for review and response. After reviewing the limited military personnel records and the applicant’s submission, it appears that...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00969
United States Air Forces in Europe (USAFE) major command (MAJCOM) denied this award on grounds that he was a flight surgeon and thus considered no more than a passenger on these flights, while other flight surgeons (assigned to different commands) were awarded this medal during the same period for participating on the same flight missions. HQ USAFE supplemented this regulation with additional criteria, to be applied to regularly assigned aircrew members, but not to flight surgeons. ...
United States Air Forces in Europe (USAFE) major command (MAJCOM) denied this award on grounds that he was a flight surgeon and thus considered no more than a passenger on these flights, while other flight surgeons (assigned to different commands) were awarded this medal during the same period for participating on the same flight missions. HQ USAFE supplemented this regulation with additional criteria, to be applied to regularly assigned aircrew members, but not to flight surgeons. ...
These documents are appended at Exhibit A. DPPPRA stated that the applicant was discharged on 16 Nov 45 and has not provided any documentation showing he made any effort to resolve the issue of additional oak leaf clusters for his DFC or AM prior to this application. A complete copy of this evaluation is appended at Exhibit C. 2 98-01710 APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He stated that he cannot be held responsible for changes in administrative personnel or priorities during war...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00935
Further without evidence to verify the applicant was recommended for the SS his request could not be favorably considered. His records do not reflect that he was recommended for, or awarded the SS. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Reginald P. Howard, Member Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2006-00325 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Mar 06, w/atchs.
There is no indication in his records, and he did not provide any documentation, showing he was recommended for the DFC or an oak leaf cluster to his AM. The operative word in [the former group commander’s] statement that the Chief apparently overlooked is “Before” [emphasis applicant’s]. Therefore, the criteria for that command was not completion of a specified number of missions (35) before being recommended for the DFC and completing a tour.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02068
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02068 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart Medal (PHM), and the (POW) prisoner-of- war medal; therefore, his POW status must be reviewed. He was shot down on his first mission and was interned in Sweden until he was returned to military...
During the period of 7 Oct 44 through 9 Apr 45, the applicant completed 30 operational missions. The applicant did not respond to DPPR’s letter requesting a copy of his Report of Separation. Without any additional documentation to support his request, DPPPR cannot verify the applicant’s eligibility for the DFC; therefore, they recommend the applicant’s request be denied (Exhibit B).
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | bc-2005-01522
He should be awarded the DFC for his actions on 23 June 1952. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the AmnM is awarded for voluntary risk of life not involving actual combat and the applicant’s actions on 23 June 1952 were previously recognized in the AM he was awarded for numerous operational flights from 8 May 1953 to 23 June 1952. On 14 June 1952, he was awarded...
The Air Force indicates that AF Form 7 (Airman Military Record), Item 2, reflects the applicant served in the Air Force from 25 Oct 66 - 16 Sep 79, with two tours in Taiwan: 30 Apr 67 - 30 May 68 2 JUl 69 - 2 OCt 70 Airlift Squadron Organizational Maintenance On 10 Nov 97, AFPC/DPAIPl requested the applicant furnish copies of TDY orders, Travel Vouchers, etc., in order to substantiate his claim. In response, the applicant submitted a photograph and a letter from an individual, dated 28 Nov...