RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00356
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The narrative reason for her discharge be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and
the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the
appropriate offices of the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no need to
recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application and states that no
change in the records is warrant and the application should be denied.
There is no evidence of error or irregularity in the processing of the
case.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
The Separations Branch, AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed this application and states
that the applicant did not identify any specific errors in the discharge
processing nor provide facts which warrant a change in her reason for
discharge. Therefore, they recommend denial of her request.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluations and provided a response
which is attached at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. The applicant contends the reason
for her discharge was the result of her Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
(PTSD) as a result of the sexual harassment she experienced, rather than a
personality disorder. In support of her appeal, the applicant submits a
statement from a civilian psychologist who diagnosed the applicant’s
condition as PTSD. Based on the evidence of record, it that while the
diagnosis of personality disorder may have been appropriate at the time of
her separation, since it was not until 1980 that PTSD was recognized in the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), a more
appropriate diagnosis of the applicant’s condition is PTSD. In view of
this, and in an effort to remove the stigma attached to her narrative
reason for discharge, we believe the applicant’s narrative reason for
separation should be changed in the interest of equity and justice.
Therefore, we recommend her records be corrected to the extent indicated
below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 7 September 1984, she was
honorably discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-10 (Secretarial
Authority) and issued a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of “KFF.”
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 10 February 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Panel Chair
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Member
Mr. Walter J. Hosey, Member
Mr. Phillip E. Horton, Examiner (without vote)
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Jan 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 29 Apr 98.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 13 May 98.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 25 May 98.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 24 Jul 98, w/atchs.
VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ
Panel Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00356 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for her discharge be changed. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00017 INDEX NUMBER: 100.07;110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Block 28, “Narrative Reason for Separation,” of his DD Form 214, “Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty” be changed from “Personality Disorder” to “Secretarial Authority.” His records...
However, an error is noted in his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty), Item 28, which states the narrative reason for separation as being “Personality Disorder.” The BCMR Medical Consultant states that the current Air Force Instruction (AFI) regulating separations for mental health problems does not allow coding for other than “Personality Disorder,” an entirely different DSM-IV code sequence from that with which the applicant was diagnosed. A complete copy of...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01976 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The applicant requests that his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow his immediate reenlistment. Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected to the extend indicated below. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records...
A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Military Personnel Management Specialist, Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, states that the case has been reviewed for separation processing and there are no errors or irregularities causing an injustice to the applicant. We note that prior to the applicant’s separation from the Air Force, she received a commander-directed mental health evaluation and was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01423 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized, entry-level separation be changed to reflect that he was honorably discharged for Convenience of the Government. The Medical Consultant further recommends that the Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02903
He received an RE code of 2C, which defined means “Involuntary separation with honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization of service.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant found that no change to applicant’s record was warranted. AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPAE verified that the RE code of 2C was correct. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to her discharge are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied. As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03301 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for separation on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to “attend school.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The...
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Military Personnel Management Specialist, Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, concurs with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant’s recommendation that the applicant’s narrative reason for separation should be changed. We do believe that the RE code 2C is the correct code assigned at the time of applicant’s separation. OSCAR A. GOLDFARB Panel Chair INDEX CODE: 110 AFBCMR 98-02636 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...