ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-01621
INDEX CODE: 100, 131, 131.01
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: Yes
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. Correction of his Officer Selection Brief (OSB) to reflect the
correct duty organization, command level, and academic education.
2. A new Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) be prepared with a
Definitely Promote (DP) recommendation.
3. Direct promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel with a date
of rank (DOR) as if he had been selected for promotion by the Calendar
Year (CY95B) Central Lieutenant Colonel Board.
4. Or, in the alternative, correction of his OSB to reflect the
correct duty organization, command level, and academic education; his
PRF be changed to a DP recommendation; and, that he be granted a
Special Selection Board (SSB).
_________________________________________________________________
RESUME OF CASE:
As a result of a previous appeal, on 22 Oct 96, the Board recommended
the applicant’s records be corrected to reflect that the OSB, prepared
on 7 Oct 94 for consideration by the Calendar Year 1994A Lieutenant
Colonel Board, be amended to change the 5 Jul 94 entry under his
Assignment History to read “W/B” under “CMD LVL” and “439th Airlift
Wing” under “Organization” and the entry “SQ” that follows the
organization title should read “Wing.” It was further recommended
that he be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel
by SSB for the CY94A (11 Oct 94) Lieutenant Colonel Board, with the
corrected OSB.
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings (ROP) is attached at
Exhibit G.
In an application, dated 22 May 97, applicant requested the following:
1. Correction of his OSB to reflect the correct duty organization,
command level, and academic education.
2. A new PRF be prepared with a DP recommendation.
3. Direct promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel with a DOR
as if he had been selected for promotion by the CY95 Central
Lieutenant Colonel Board.
4. Or, in the alternative, correction of his OSB to reflect the
correct duty organization, command level, and academic education; his
PRF be changed to a DP recommendation; and, that he be granted an SSB.
On 30 Sep 98, the Board considered and denied applicant’s requests,
concluding that since he received SSB consideration by the CY94A board
with the corrected assignment history and was not selected for
promotion, the Board was not persuaded that the same correction would
enhance his record sufficiently to warrant promotion by the CY95B
board. Therefore, in the absence of clear-cut evidence that the
omission of this information was the basis for his nonselection, the
Board agreed with the comments of the Air Force and adopted the
rationale expressed as the basis that the applicant failed to sustain
his burden that he suffered either an error or an injustice.
A complete copy of the ROP is attached at Exhibit H.
On 27 Feb 99, the applicant requested reconsideration of his
application and asks that his records be corrected to reflect both
that he holds an LL.M in Environmental Law from George Washington
University and served as the active duty Staff Judge Advocate (SJA)
for the 439th Airlift Wing (AFRES) at Westover AFB. He asks that
following these corrections, a new PRF be prepared awarding him a DP
recommendation, or at a minimum, that another board be convened to
consider the corrected record for a DP recommendation, as the errors
in his record greatly reduced his chances of obtaining a DP
recommendation. He also asks that an SSB be convened to consider the
corrected record.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a statement from the
Chief, Executive Issues Team, and an Extract of SSB Questions and
Answers (see Exhibit I).
The applicant was considered and selected for promotion to the grade
of lieutenant colonel by the CY99A (19 Apr 99) Central Lieutenant
Colonel Board, effective, and with a DOR of 1 Sep 99.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. After reviewing the
statement provided by the Chief, Executive Issues Team, who served on
the judge advocate panel of the CY95B board, we are persuaded that the
OSB reviewed by the board in question did not reflect the factual
information and therefore the applicant was considered for promotion
with an inaccurate record. The Chief stated that he recalled a
discrepancy when he reviewed the applicant’s record while serving on
the board. Specifically, that the Training Report (TR) from the AFIT-
sponsored LL.M program noted that he had “not completed” the course
requirements for the degree-awarding program but it included a comment
that his thesis “should be approved by 30 Nov 92.” The Chief stated
that he specifically remembers checking applicant’s OSB and noting
that the OSB failed to show that applicant had been awarded an LL.M.
Therefore, in view these statements, and in order to offset any
possibility of an injustice, we recommend the OSB be corrected as
indicated below. Furthermore, since the Board-directed correction to
the 5 Jul 94 assignment history entry was not accomplished until after
the CY95B board, we again recommend his corrected record be provided
promotion consideration to the grade of lieutenant colonel by SSB for
the CY94A Lieutenant Colonel Board with the recommended changes.
2. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice with regard to
applicant’s request that a new PRF be prepared with a DP
recommendation or that he receive direct promotion to the grade of
lieutenant colonel with a DOR as if selected by the CY95B Central
Lieutenant Colonel Board. Other than his own assertions, the
applicant has provided no evidence to substantiate that his
performance record, as currently constructed, is erroneous or
incomplete. Therefore, we have no basis on which to favorably
consider this request.
3. The documentation provided with this case was sufficient to give
the Board a clear understanding of the issues involved and a personal
appearance, with or without counsel, would not have materially added
to that understanding. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not
favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. The OSB, prepared on 7 Oct 94 for consideration by the
CY94A Lieutenant Colonel Board, be amended under Academic Education by
adding “LLM” under “LVL;” “Environmental Law” under “Specialty;” and,
“George Washington University” under “School.”
b. The OSB, prepared on 17 Nov 95 for consideration by the
CY95B Lieutenant Colonel Board, be amended to change the 5 Jul 94
entry under Assignment History to read “W/B” under “CMD LVL;” 439th
Airlift Wing under “Organization;” and the entry “SQ” that follows the
organizational title should read “Wing.” and under Academic Education
by adding “LLM” under “LVL;” “Environmental Law” under “Specialty;”
and, “George Washington University” under “School.”
It is further recommended that he be considered for promotion to the
grade of lieutenant colonel by SSB for the CY94A (11 Oct 94) and CY95B
(17 Nov 95) Lieutenant Colonel Boards, with the corrected OSBs.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 13 August 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. John L. Robuck, Panel Chair
Mr. Mike Novel, Member
Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Member
Mrs. Joyce Earley, Examiner (without vote)
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit G. ROP, dated 22 Nov 96, w/atchs.
Exhibit H. ROP, dated 11 Dec 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit I. Letter fr applicant, dated 27 Feb 99, w/atchs.
JOHN L. ROBUCK
Panel Chair
INDEX CODE: 100, 131, 131.01
AFBCMR 97-01621
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. The Officer Selection Brief (OSB), prepared on
7 October 1994 for consideration by the Calendar Year 1994A (CY94A)
Lieutenant Colonel Board, be amended under Academic Education by
adding “LLM” under “LVL;” “Environmental Law” under “Specialty;” and,
“George Washington University” under “School.”
b. The OSB, prepared on 17 November 1995 for
consideration by the CY95B Lieutenant Colonel Board, be amended to
change the 5 Jul 94 entry under Assignment History to read “W/B” under
“CMD LVL;” 439th Airlift Wing under “Organization;” and the entry “SQ”
that follows the organizational title should read “Wing.” and under
Academic Education by adding “LLM” under “LVL;” “Environmental Law”
under “Specialty;” and, “George Washington University” under “School.”
It is further directed that he be considered for promotion to
the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board for the
CY94A (11 October 1994) and CY95B (17 November 1995) Lieutenant
Colonel Boards, with the corrected OSBs.
JOE G.
LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force
Review Boards Agency
On 30 Sep 98, the Board considered and denied applicant’s requests, concluding that since he received SSB consideration by the CY94A board with the corrected assignment history and was not selected for promotion, the Board was not persuaded that the same correction would enhance his record sufficiently to warrant promotion by the CY95B board. A complete copy of the ROP is attached at Exhibit H. On 27 Feb 99, the applicant requested reconsideration of his application and asks that his...
Or, in the alternative, correction of his OSB to reflect the 4. correct duty organization, command level, and academic education; his PRF be changed to a DP recommendation; and, that he be granted a Special Selection Board (SSB). AFBCMR 97-0 1 62 1 The AFBCMR granted the applicant a SSB by the CY94A lieutenant colonel board based on the information contained on the CY94A OSB. We note that the applicant received SSB consideration by the CY94A board with the corrected assignment history and...
Therefore, we recommend his corrected record be considered by Special Selection Board for the CY94A board THE BOARD RECOMM ENDS THA T: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that: a. It is further recommended that his corrected record, to include an Officer Selection Brief reflecting the first entry under Assignment History as DAFSC "5153", CMD LVL \\W/B", and Organization "Airlift Wing", be considered for promotion to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01385
The AFPC/JA evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO recommends the application be denied, and states, in part, that officers will not be considered by an SSB if, in exercising reasonable diligence, the officer should have discovered the error or omission in his/her records and could have taken timely corrective action. Applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we do not find these assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air...
On the contrary, the issue here is whether any error has occurred within an internal Air Force promotion recommendation procedure (unlike Sanders, this applicant has not proven the existence of any error requiring correction) , wherein the final promotion recommendation (DP, Promote, Do Not Promote) cannot exist without the concurrence of the officers who authored and approved it. The attached reaccomplished PRF, reflecting a promotion recommendation of IIDefinitely Promote (DP) , be...
The applicant received a "Promote" recommendation on the PRF prepared for the CY92A Col Board. On 13 December 1993, the applicant filed an Inspector General (IG) complaint alleging that the former Air Force Intelligence Command Commander (AFIC/CC) convened a board to 'rack and stack" officers eligible for promotion to be considered by the CY92A Col Board and then used the priority list to award "Definitely Promote (DP) " recommendations in violation of the governing regulation. ...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02055
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Report and Queries Section, AFPC/DPAIS1, indicated that a review of the applicant’s duty history revealed that the upgrade to “Chief, Electronic Combat Systems” was entered into the PDS with an effective date of 1 Aug 94. A complete copy of the DPAIS1 evaluation is at Exhibit C. The Selection Board Secretariat, AFPC/DPPB, reviewed this application and indicated that they disagreed with the...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Report and Queries Section, AFPC/DPAIS1, indicated that a review of the applicant’s duty history revealed that the upgrade to “Chief, Electronic Combat Systems” was entered into the PDS with an effective date of 1 Aug 94. A complete copy of the DPAIS1 evaluation is at Exhibit C. The Selection Board Secretariat, AFPC/DPPB, reviewed this application and indicated that they disagreed with the...
A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 4 May 1998 for review and response. Contrary to applicant's assertions that this individual did not have the background in ICBMs to properly assess his record, we note that the new Senior Rater, in addition to having access to applicant's Record of Performance, had access to experts from all weapon systems. ...
In summary, no senior rater, no MLRB President, no central selection board, and no -special selection board has ever reviewed his CY90 (1 year BPZ)"records that included the revised CY89 ( 2 year BPZ) PRF. Based on the SRR review of his PO589 PRF and subsequent upgrade, the applicant was considered and not selected for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by SSB for the CY89A Board. Based on upon a senior rater review (SRR) of his previous CY89 (1 5 May 89) lieutenant colonel...