ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 87-00353
INDEX NUMBER: 100.03
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2X be upgraded.
EXAMINER’S NOTE: RE-2X denotes considered but not selected for
reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program.
___________________________________________________________________
RESUME OF CASE:
On 15 May 1987, the AFBCMR considered and denied a similar appeal
submitted by the applicant requesting that his RE Code of 2X be
changed to a 1X and that his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release
from Active Duty, be changed to reflect the grade of sergeant
rather than senior airman (Exhibits A through E).
On 2 April 1999, the applicant submitted another application
requesting that his RE Code be upgraded and provided a Report of
Medical Examination in support of his appeal (Exhibit F). On
11 May 1999, he was advised that the current Report of Medical
Examination did not pertain to the issues cited in his initial
application requesting his RE Code be upgraded. Therefore, his
request did not meet the criteria for reconsideration (Exhibit G).
By letter dated 9 June 1999, applicant requested an upgrade of his
RE Code on the basis of clemency. He provided additional
documentation in the form of three letters of character reference
from his pastor, a co-worker, and an acquaintance, as well as four
Airman Performance Reports (APRs) and letters of appreciation
received while he was in the service, and two certificates (Exhibit
H).
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, provided a copy of an FBI
Identification Record pertaining to the applicant, which is
attached at Exhibit I.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
In its initial review of this case, the Board noted the absence of
an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment/Noncommissioned Officer
Status Consideration, from the applicant’s records. Therefore, the
facts surrounding the denial of reenlistment eligibility are
unknown. Nevertheless, based on the presumption of regularity in
the conduct of governmental affairs and without evidence to the
contrary, we must assume that the RE code assigned at the time of
the applicant’s separation was proper and in compliance with the
governing regulation. We have noted the letters of character
reference provided in the applicant’s behalf. However, in view of
the very limited documentation pertaining to the denial of
reenlistment action, as well as the contents of the FBI
Identification Record (Exhibit I), we are not persuaded that a
change to the applicant’s RE Code is warranted on the basis of
clemency. In view of the foregoing, we therefore conclude that no
basis exists to change the Board’s previous decision to deny the
applicant’s request.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission
of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 2 and 24 September 1999, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Terry A. Yonkers, Panel Chair
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member
Dr. Gerald B. Kauvar, Member
The following additional documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit F. DD Form 149, dated 2 Apr 99, w/atch.
Exhibit G. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 11 May 99.
Exhibit H. Letter from Applicant, dated 9 Jun 99, w/atchs.
Exhibit I. FBI Identification Record.
TERRY A. YONKERS
Panel Chair
By letter dated 9 June 1999, applicant requested an upgrade of his RE Code on the basis of clemency. However, in view of the very limited documentation pertaining to the denial of reenlistment action, as well as the contents of the FBI Identification Record (Exhibit I), we are not persuaded that a change to the applicant’s RE Code is warranted on the basis of clemency. In view of the foregoing, we therefore conclude that no basis exists to change the Board’s previous decision to deny...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00977 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to allow eligibility to enlist in the Air National Guard or Air Force Reserves. After 15 years of active duty commitment, he would like to continue giving to his country as...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03252
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Further, the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to warrant corrective action based on an injustice. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-03252 in Executive Session on 18 Nov 09, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s request for an upgrade in her discharge on 1 February 1995. The records indicate the member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 23 August 1989, she was honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge Certificate.
f. Vacation of nonjudicial punishment, dated 9 Jul 81, for failure to go to guardmount at the time prescribed. The complete report is at Exhibit F. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT”S RESPONSE TO FBI REPORT: A copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the applicant on 23 Oct 01 for review and comment within 30 days. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 14 Sep 01.
On 1 November 1983, he enlisted in the Regular Air Force, in the grade of airman (E-2), for a period of four years. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant stated that during his four years on active duty he did receive two Article 15s, and they were both alcohol related and were off duty. After a thorough review of the available records, we found no evidence that the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00420 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general under honorable conditions. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02972 INDEX CODE: 110 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 5 May 82, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFM 39-12 (Request For Discharge for the Good of the Service) with service characterized as under other than honorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01277
On 10 August 1987, the commander signed a recommendation to the discharge authority for the applicant’s discharge based on misconduct under AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-46 with a general discharge. On 8 September 1987, the applicant was discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge with a narrative reason for separation of “Misconduct – Pattern of Minor Disciplinary Infractions” and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2B” (discharged under general conditions). The...