RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01635
INDEX CODE: 110
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
Applicant requests that his general discharge be changed to honorable
and the reason for separation (Drug Abuse Rehabilitation Failure) be
changed. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's
request on 10 Jun 99. In accordance with policy, the application was
forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The
decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and
response (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received
by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or
injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated
in the AFDRB Brief appear to be based on the evidence of record and
have not been rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive evidence
applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations
were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find
no basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not reasonably available at the time the application was
filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Mr. Joseph A. Roj, and
Ms. Dorothy P. Loeb considered this application on 26 October 1999 in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and
the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. AFDRB Brief
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding AFDRB Brief
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1999-01635
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 10 Jun 99. In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 13 April 1999. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 10 Apr 96. The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant/counsel for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions and the AFDRB Brief appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 27 February 2001. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
On 1 March 2000, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request that his discharge be upgraded to honorable and that the reason for discharge be changed. (See AFDRB Hearing Record at Exhibit C.) The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion and the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) Hearing Record were...
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the Brief prepared by the Examiner for the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
On 21 Mar 2000, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s request for upgrade of his discharge to honorable and change of his RE code. A copy of the AFDRB Hearing record is attached at Exhibit C. The AFDRB Hearing Record was forwarded to applicant for review and response (Exhibit D.). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit E). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit F). Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.