RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-03105
INDEX NUMBER: 110.02, 100.03
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his general (under honorable conditions)
discharge be upgraded to honorable and his Reenlistment Eligibility
(RE) code be changed from 2B. {Examiner’s Note: RE code 2B denotes
involuntarily separated under AFR 39-10, with a general or under other
that honorable condition (UOTHC) discharge.} Applicant's submission
is at Exhibit A.
On 1 March 2000, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB)
considered and denied the applicant’s request that his discharge be
upgraded to honorable and that the reason for discharge be changed.
(See AFDRB Hearing Record at Exhibit C.)
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and
provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application
be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion and the Air Force
Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) Hearing Record were forwarded to the
applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or
injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated
in the advisory opinion and AFDRB Hearing Record appear to be based on
the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate
standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing
record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not available at the time the application was filed.
Members of the Board, Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Mr. Gregory H.
Petkoff, and Mr. Edward H. Parker, considered this application on 26
July 2000 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction
36-2603 and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
On 21 Mar 2000, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s request for upgrade of his discharge to honorable and change of his RE code. A copy of the AFDRB Hearing record is attached at Exhibit C. The AFDRB Hearing Record was forwarded to applicant for review and response (Exhibit D.). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board f o r further consideration (Exhibit C) The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant I s request and provided ar- advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be dellied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's 27 Mar 95 request for an honorable discharge on 5 Nov 96. The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01907
Applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant’s request for an upgrade of discharge on 21 August 2002. A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 18 July 2003, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01753
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01753 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected by changing the description of his misconduct from “a user or abuser of illegal drugs” to “a conspirator in the purchase/sale/use of an illegal drug.” His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2B” be...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant/counsel for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions and the AFDRB Brief appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02664 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code be upgraded to allow him the opportunity to reenlist into the military. The applicant states that the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) has upgraded his discharge; however, they were unable to upgrade his RE...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 25 May 2000. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The AFDRB brief and advisory opinion were forwarded to applicant for review and response (Exhibit E).
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 13 April 1999. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 27 February 2001. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.