RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01166
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his discharge be upgraded to honorable.
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on
13 April 1999. In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to
this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The AFDRB brief was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to
warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated in the AFDRB
brief appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been
rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied
rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the
existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only
be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was
not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Mr. Grover L. Dunn, and Mr.
Steven A. Shaw considered this application on 19 August 1999, in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603 and the
governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. AFDRB Brief
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 10 Jun 99. In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1999-01635
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 10 Jun 99. In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 10 Apr 96. The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 27 February 2001. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant/counsel for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions and the AFDRB Brief appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the Brief prepared by the Examiner for the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
On 21 Mar 2000, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s request for upgrade of his discharge to honorable and change of his RE code. A copy of the AFDRB Hearing record is attached at Exhibit C. The AFDRB Hearing Record was forwarded to applicant for review and response (Exhibit D.). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
On 1 March 2000, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request that his discharge be upgraded to honorable and that the reason for discharge be changed. (See AFDRB Hearing Record at Exhibit C.) The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion and the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) Hearing Record were...
JUL 23 1998 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF DOCKET NUMBER: 97-03150 INDEX CODE 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No APPLICANT-REQUESTS THAT: Her under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT-OF FACTS: The relevant facts...