RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00721
INDEX CODE: 100
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: Yes
Applicant requests adjustment of his Aviation Service Date (ASD) to
reflect 19 years of aviation service not 26 years of aviation service.
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and
provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application
be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the
applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or
injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated
in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record
and have not been rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive evidence
applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations
were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find
no basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not reasonably available at the time the application was
filed.
Members of the Board , , and considered
this application in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Microfiche
C. Advisory Opinions
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions
Exhibit A. evaluated applicant's request The appropriate Air Force office to the Board recommending the and provided an advisory opinion The advisory opinion was application be denied (Exhibit C ) . Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. All other aviation cadet graduates of air crew training will...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR F O R C E B A S E T E X A S MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPAE 550 C Street West, Ste 10 Randolph AFB TX 78150-4712 The applicant is requesting his records be...
The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR F O R C E B A S E T E X A S MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPAE 550 C Street West, Ste 10 Randolph AFB TX 78150-4712 The applicant is requesting his records be...
We note that the applicant’s DD Form 214 has been administratively corrected to reflect a separation date of 31 May 00, award of the Air Medal, and the KC-10A Instructor Qualification Course, March 1999, added under Military Education. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's requests and provided an advisory opinion to the Board (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant’s request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit D). Members of the Board, Mr. Gerald B. Kauvar, Ms. Marcia J. Bachman, and Mr. Roger E. Willmeth, considered this application on 3 Aug 00 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603 and the governing statute,...
Applicant requests the DD Form 215 reflect the Good Conduct Medal, Marksmanship Badge with Pistol Bar, Air Crew Member Aviation Badge, and Aircraft Maintenance Badge. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's remaining request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
Applicant requests that he receive retroactive retired pay based on the over 22 year pay scale for the period 16 December 1963 through 6 June 1989, The appropriate Defense Finance and Accounting Service and Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied The advisory opinions were forwarded to the (Exhibit C). REQUESTED ACTION: Applicant requests retroactive retired pay fiom his retirement date of 27 Dec 1963...
On 9 Apr 97, the Board recommended he be considered by an FEB to determine his qualification for aviation service and that the results of the FEB be forwarded to the Commander, AETC, for final determination of his qualification for aviation service. A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings, with a corrected directive, is attached at Exhibit C. On 5 Feb 98, a second FEB was convened to consider evidence concerning applicant’s professional qualifications, specifically lack of judgment and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00415
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00415 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was not removed from aviation training as a pilot and that he did not lose his aeronautical badge (pilot wings). The FEB board, convening authority, and reviewing authority recommended the applicant be...