RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03324
INDEX CODE: 111.01, 131.01
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: Yes
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS:
Promotion reconsideration by the Calendar Year 1998B (1 Jun 98)
Lieutenant Colonel Board with inclusion of the Officer Performance
Report (OPR) rendered for the period 31 May 97 through 21 May 98.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The contested report should have been included in his record for the
CY98B board. He stated, in part, that he and his squadron commander
were fully aware of the importance of having a current OPR in his
records. With his squadron commander’s change of command scheduled
for 21 May 98, that became the logical close out date for the OPR. He
was assured group and wing staffs had been consulted and that there
would be ample time to get the OPR signed and into his records for the
board to consider. A string of three consecutive temporary duties
(TDYs) from mid-May to early June limited his ability to follow up on
the OPR.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a copy of the report
in question, copies of his TDY orders, and statements from the
evaluators of the contested report.
Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant’s Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) is
23 Apr 82. He is currently serving on extended active duty in the
grade of major, effective, and with a date of rank (DOR) of 1 Sep 94.
Applicant’s Officer Effectiveness Report (OER) and OPR profile since
1986 follows:
PERIOD ENDING OVERALL EVALUATION
25 Feb 86 1-1-1
25 Jun 86 1-1-1
23 Jul 87 1-1-1
9 Oct 87 Education/Training Report (TR)
25 Feb 87 1-1-1
13 Sep 88 Meets Standards
13 Sep 89 Meets Standards
13 Sep 90 Meets Standards
13 Sep 91 Meets Standards
20 May 92 Meets Standards
20 May 93 Meets Standards
30 May 94 Meets Standards
30 May 95 Meets Standards
30 May 96 Meets Standards
30 May 97 Meets Standards
* 21 May 98 Meets Standards
21 May 99 Meets Standards
* Contested report.
The contested report was filed in applicant’s records on 29 Jul 98.
Applicant was considered and not selected for promotion to the grade
of lieutenant colonel by the CY98B and CY99A Central Lieutenant
Colonel Boards.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Appeals & SSB Branch, AFPC/DPPPA, reviewed this application
and indicated that the OPR the applicant desires to be included in his
record for reconsideration closes out on 21 May 98. AFI 36-2402,
paragraph 3.6.4.3, states that OPRs are due for file at Headquarters
Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) no later than 60 days following the
close out of the report. In the applicant’s case, the OPR was due for
file on 21 Jul 98-well after the board.
Regarding the statements from the evaluators of the contested report,
neither one of the evaluators demonstrate that they made extraordinary
efforts prior to the convening date to have the OPR filed in the
applicant’s record in time for the board. DPPPA notes that the
signature dates on the OPR are 26 Jun 98, 30 Jun 98, and 2 Jul 98 by
the rater, additional rater, and reviewer, respectively. The
evaluators did not sign the report until late June/early Jul 98-after
the board had not only convened but adjourned as well. DPPPA is not
convinced the evaluators intended to have the report in question at
AFPC in time for consideration for the CY98B board.
DPPPA further states that each officer eligible for promotion
consideration is advised of the entitlement to communicate with the
board president. The applicant could have used this means to inform
the board president of his past year’s accomplishments. However,
DPPPA verified that the applicant elected not to exercise this
entitlement. Based on the evidence provided, they recommend denial
due to lack of merit.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and provided a one-page
statement and a statement from his commander.
Applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is attached at
Exhibit E.
On 29 Mar 99, the additional rater of the contested report provided a
statement in applicant’s behalf (see Exhibit F).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. After thoroughly
reviewing the evidence of record, to include the statements from the
applicant’s rating chain, we are persuaded that he was denied fair and
equitable consideration for promotion by the CY98B selection board.
In this respect, although the contested report was not required to be
on file at the time the CY98B board convened, we note the comments
from applicant’s rating chain that it was their intent to have the
contested report completed and in his records for the CY98B board to
review. However, it appears that through no fault of the applicant’s,
the contested report was returned for corrections and through
administrative oversight, was not finalized until after the selection
board had adjourned. While it cannot be conclusively determined what
impact the lack of this OPR had on the selection board, we believe it
served to deprive him of full and fair consideration. Therefore, we
recommend his record, to include the contested report, be considered
by an SSB for the CY98B selection board.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, to include the OPR, AF Form 707A, rendered for
the period 31 May 97 through 21 May 98, be considered for promotion to
the grade of lieutenant colonel by SSB for the CY98B Central
Lieutenant Colonel Board.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 5 August 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Rita S. Looney, Panel Chair
Ms. Marcia J. Bachman, Member
Ms. Barbara J. White-Olson, Member
Mrs. Joyce Earley, Examiner (without vote)
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Nov 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPA, dated 21 Dec 98.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 18 Jan 99.
Exhibit E. Letter fr applicant, dated 11 Mar 99, w/atch.
Exhibit F. Letter fr additional rater, dated 29 Mar 99.
RITA S. LOONEY
Panel Chair
INDEX CODE: 111.01, 131.01
AFBCMR 98-03324
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , to include the Officer Performance Report, AF
Form 707A, rendered for the period 31 May 1997 through 21 May 1998, be
considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by a
Special Selection Board for the Calendar Year 1998B Central Lieutenant
Colonel Board.
JOE G.
LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force
Review Boards Agency
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00154 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be considered for promotion to lieutenant colonel by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY98B (1 Jun 98) Biomedical Sciences Corps (BSC) Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, with inclusion of the Officer Performance Report (OPR)...
Had he properly reviewed his OPBs prior to either of his BPZ considerations, his record would have been accurate for his P0598B in-the-promotion zone consideration. A complete copy of the DPPPA evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant indicated that he believes he is deserving of promotion and he is simply requesting that he be considered for promotion with accurate...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Directorate of Assignments, HQ AFPC/DPAPS1, stated that based on the applicant’s selection folder, the duty titles and effective dates in question were in error on the Officer Selection Brief (OSB) at the time of the CY98B lieutenant colonel selection board. DPPPA noted the duty history corrections made to the applicant’s records by HQ AFPC/DPAPS1. A complete copy of this evaluation is appended at...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01399 INDEX CODE: 111.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Letter of Evaluation (LOE), dated 3 Feb 96, become a permanent addendum to his Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period ending 30 Nov 96; his Officer Selection Brief (OSB), dated 19 May 98, be corrected to reflect his Date of Separation as Indefinite and any reference to a retirement date...
At the time applicant was considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by the CY98B board, his OSB reflected his duty title as Commander, DDD Letterkenny, effective 26 Jun 97. The next duty entry of 960613 was changed to reflect information on the next OPR of record. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Supply Officer Assignments, AFPC/DPASL, reviewed this application and indicated that regarding applicant’s request to change his...
Even though the DMSM citation was not on file for the board, evidence of the decoration was before the board on both the officer selection brief (OSB) and the memorandum from Headquarters AFPC/DPPBR1 (Board Discrepancy Report for Board: PO598B). A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and provided a...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1999-00007
Even though the DMSM citation was not on file for the board, evidence of the decoration was before the board on both the officer selection brief (OSB) and the memorandum from Headquarters AFPC/DPPBR1 (Board Discrepancy Report for Board: PO598B). A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and provided a...
However, he has not received the report and the DOD IG has not provided a date when the report will be released. He is requesting that this medal be included for SSB consideration because of the actions of the USAF Academy and the resulting assignment to the SWC. Regarding the applicant’s request that the SWC/AE medal (Air Force Commendation Medal) be included in his records for consideration by the CY98B Lieutenant Colonel Board, it appears that the medal was awarded subsequent to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-02883
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02883 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Professional Military Education (PME) recommendations on his Officer Performance Reports (OPRs), closing 19 Mar 94 and 25 Nov 94, be changed from Intermediate Service School (ISS) to Senior Service School (SSS). The...
However, the time to do that is before the report becomes a matter of record. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant responded to the Air Force evaluation and states that the procedure of forwarding the OPR to the base personnel office (for review to assure compliance with prescribed format and completeness of data entries) before being reviewed by the ratee, prevented the discovery of administrative oversights...