RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03295
INDEX CODE: 107.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that he be awarded two additional awards of the Air
Force Outstanding Unit Award. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and
provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application
be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
Note: The correction of the applicant’s DD Form 214 to reflect award
of the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with 3 Oak Leaf Clusters
instead of 2 will be done administratively.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or
injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated
in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record
and have not been rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive evidence
applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations
were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find
no basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not reasonably available at the time the application was
filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Terry A. Yonkers, Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz and
Mr. Richard A. Peterson considered this application on 12 May 1999, in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603 and
the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
TERRY A. YONKERS
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00579 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No Applicant requests that his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 13, be corrected to reflect the Air Force Commendation Medal, First Oak Leaf Cluster (AFCM, 1OLC), Air Force Overseas Short Tour Ribbon, and Air Force Outstanding Unit Award, Second Oak Leaf Cluster (AFOUA, 2OLC). The...
The Retirement and Separations Operations Section, AFPC/DPPRR, administratively corrected applicant’s records as follows (Exhibit C): a. DD Form 214, issued on 29 August 1965, was corrected to reflect award of the Good Conduct Medal with one Silver Loop. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application for the above cited additional awards be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-02962 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: VFW HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that he be awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) and Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request concerning the AFCM and AFGCM and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request concerning the Korean Service Medal and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). After careful consideration of applicant's request concerning the Korean Service Medal and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to counsel and the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.