RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-02962
INDEX CODE: 107.00
COUNSEL: VFW
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that he be awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal
(AFCM) and Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM). Applicant's
submission is at Exhibit A.
The applicant’s request for award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal, with
Device, and any other medals awarded during his service has
administratively been corrected by HQ AFPC/DPPPR.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
concerning the AFCM and AFGCM and provided an advisory opinion to the
Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The
advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant and his counsel for
review and response (Exhibit D). Counsel's response to the advisory
opinion is at Exhibit E.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or
injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated
in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record
and have not been adequately rebutted by counsel. Absent persuasive
evidence applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate
regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not
applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not reasonably available at the time the application was
filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Terry A. Yonkers, Mr. Joseph A. Roj, and Mr.
Clarence D. Long III considered this application on 4 May 1999 in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and
the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
TERRY A. YONKERS
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
E. Counsel’s Response
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00579 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No Applicant requests that his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 13, be corrected to reflect the Air Force Commendation Medal, First Oak Leaf Cluster (AFCM, 1OLC), Air Force Overseas Short Tour Ribbon, and Air Force Outstanding Unit Award, Second Oak Leaf Cluster (AFOUA, 2OLC). The...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request concerning the Korean Service Medal and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). After careful consideration of applicant's request concerning the Korean Service Medal and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to counsel and the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the limited available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. TERRY A. YONKERS Panel Chair Exhibits: A.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02868 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to major by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY97C Major Board, with inclusion of the citation for the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (1OLC), in his Officer Selection...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant or counsel.