RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03206
INDEX CODE: 131.09
APPLICANT COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to show that, prior to his relief from active
duty on 8 November 1945, he was promoted to the grade of first
lieutenant.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Had he not been a Prisoner of War (POW), he believes he would have been
promoted by his time in grade and his duties as a lead bombardier. He
served his country faithfully and well.
In support of his application, the applicant provided copies of his
military records and correspondence associated with the matter under
review. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant’s records were destroyed in a fire at the National
Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in July 1973. The following information
was extracted from documents provided by the applicant.
On 18 March 1944, having previously been appointed an aviation cadet and
following successful completion of training, the applicant was appointed
a second lieutenant (temporary), Army of the United States, Air Corps,
and was awarded the aeronautical rating of bombardier. He entered active
duty on 18 March 1944. On 26 June 1944, he was assigned to duties in the
European Theater of Operations (ETO). Available information indicates
that he flew 8 combat missions, including a mission on 12 August 1944,
when his aircraft was shot down. He was reported missing in action and
it was subsequently determined he was a POW. He was returned to military
control on 1 May 1945, having been in POW status for a period of
approximately 8 months and 19 days). He was returned to the United
States on 21 June 1945 for repatriation under Project R.
On 26 September 1945, the applicant entered terminal leave status. On 8
November 1945, he was relieved from active duty in the grade of second
lieutenant by reason of demobilization. He was credited with service as
a commissioned officer of 7 months and 20 days of continental service and
1 year and 1 day of foreign service. He had participated in the Northern
France and Rhineland battles and campaigns and had been awarded the Air
Medal, the EAME Theater Ribbon with 2 Bronze Service Stars, and the World
War II Victory Medal. In January 1999, his records were administratively
corrected to show he was entitled to the American Campaign Medal and the
Prisoner of War Medal (Germany).
The following is a summarization of the promotion policies for officers
which were in effect during the period the events under review took
place. AR 605-12, dated 17 August 1944, was the regulation governing
officer promotions at the time of the events cited in this application.
For promotion of an officer from second lieutenant to first lieutenant to
occur, a position vacancy had to be available in the organization, the
member must have served at least 6 months in the grade of second
lieutenant, and the member had to be recommended by the unit commander as
fit for promotion as a result of demonstrated outstanding performance.
In December 1944, Change 1 was issued, which provided that, normally, no
officer would be recommended for promotion unless a position vacancy
existed in the jurisdiction of the recommending authority. However,
among the exceptions to this rule was the authorization to recommend for
promotion any second lieutenant who had completed 18 months of service in
that grade without regard to the Table of Organization, or allotment
vacancies in the grade of first lieutenant, provided the individual was
qualified for, and worthy of, promotion. In addition, the policy
provided that, in such cases, for the purpose of computing time in grade
for the promotion, service outside the continental limits of the United
States or Alaska would be counted as time and a half. The stated purpose
for the authorization was to provide for the promotion of those denied
merited advancement solely because they were not assigned to positions
established for the higher grade.
In March 1945, the Secretary of War and the Secretary of the Navy signed
a Joint Agreement of Policy on Returned Prisoners of War and Military and
Naval Personnel of Like Status. Among other things, the agreement
provided that personnel who presumably would have been advanced in grade,
rank or rating, but for their capture, escape or evasion, would, upon
their return to military control, receive prompt consideration for an
immediate promotion of one rank, grade or rating, as soon as they were
found to be individually qualified. This policy was made a part of AR
605-12 by the issuance of Change 2, dated 23 May 1945. In a War
Department Message issued in September 1945, it was indicated that all
POWs who were absent from military control under honorable conditions for
more than 18 months and had not received a one-grade promotion should be
immediately promoted. Former POWs who had been absent from military
control for less than 18 months were to be processed in accordance with
the existing POW promotion policy.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Officer Promotions Management Section, AFPC/DPPPOO, reviewed this
application and recommended denial. DPPPOO noted that the application
has been filed more than 50 years after the events under review took
place and they are therefore of the opinion that the application should
be dismissed under the doctrine of laches. DPPPOO stated that there is
no indication in the available record that the applicant was promoted
under the policy allowing for special consideration for returnees after
he had been considered for such a promotion (see Exhibit C).
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and stated he can provide no
additional evidence. He notes that personnel at his last duty assignment
prior to his relief from active duty were unaware of his status as a
former POW. He also stated that in those days, former POWs were not very
popular. Some held the opinion that POWs allowed themselves to be
captured to avoid combat. With all this publicity, they did not discuss
their POW experiences. Even at this late date, some of their families do
not know about their experiences. The time delay noted by DPPPOO was
caused by public opinions, and disinterest and disbelief in the truth.
He is not pursuing this relief for any money. Rather, he had filed this
application so that he can say he is proud he did his part to make this
country free because he knows that “Freedom is not Free.”
In a second rebuttal letter, the applicant asserted that his records were
not correct at separation. Policy for POW promotions was 12 months of
time in grade for promotion from second to first lieutenant. He believes
he met the criteria for a POW promotion and stated that the Board must
base its decision on whether he should have been promoted on the current
record and the policy for promotions for POWs/former POWs in effect at
the time.
The applicant’s submissions are at Exhibit E.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. The purpose of the POW
promotion policy established in 1945 was to provide equitable promotion
consideration for members who most likely would have been promoted but
for their absence from military control. The applicant was credited with
1 year, 7 months and 21 days of commissioned service, of which 1 year and
1 day was foreign service. It appears that the applicant met the
criteria contained in Change 1 to AR 605-12 for promotion consideration
to first lieutenant while he was in POW status. It is highly probable
the absence of any promotion consideration in this case was the result of
an oversight during the period of turmoil associated with repatriation
and demobilization. In view of the above and in recognition of the
applicant’s service to the nation, we believe that any doubt in this
matter should be resolved in his favor and that his records should be
corrected to show he was promoted to first lieutenant on the day
following his return to the jurisdiction of United States military
authorities.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was promoted to the
temporary grade of first lieutenant, Army of the United States (Air
Corps), effective 2 May 1945, and, on 8 November 1945, he was honorably
relieved from active duty in the grade of first lieutenant, rather than
in the grade of second lieutenant.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 1 June 1999 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson Panel Chair
Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 November 1998, with
attachments.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPOO, dated 31 December 1998.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 8 February 1998.
Exhibit E. Applicant’s Letter, dated 11 February 1999.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 98-03206
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was promoted to the
temporary grade of first lieutenant, Army of the United States (Air
Corps), effective 2 May 1945, and, on 8 November 1945, he was honorably
relieved from active duty in the grade of first lieutenant, rather than
in the grade of second lieutenant.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
They therefore, recommended that the applicant’s records be corrected to show he was promoted to the grade of first lieutenant effective upon his release from active duty (Exhibit C). The applicant correctly notes that the governing regulation was amended on 9 December 1944 to authorize the submission of a recommendation for promotion to first lieutenant of any second lieutenant who had completed 18 months of service in the grade, provided the individual was qualified for, and worthy of,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03812
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03812 INDEX CODE: 107.00; 131.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was promoted to the grade of first lieutenant based on his status as a Prisoner of War (POW), he be awarded the Silver Star, and he be given appropriate recognition (award) for actions...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00199
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00199 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was promoted to the grade of first lieutenant prior to the time he was a Prisoner of War (POW) and that he was promoted to the grade of captain based on his status as a...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03241
He states, since there are no records available to support a promotion as a member of the 55th Fighter Group, in 1944, he requests that he receive a promotion to first lieutenant, effective 24 December 1944 as authorized by Congress in 2001. Since he would then be a first lieutenant, at the time of his promotion at Wright-Patterson AFB, he requests that promotion, effective that date, be to captain. As stated, although the applicant was promoted to first lieutenant, we do not have any...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00995
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00995 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 AUG 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was promoted to the grade of captain and he served on active duty from 24 February 1943 to 12...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014532
Item 38 (Highest Grade Held) of the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 contains the entry "PRIVATE." 6, dated 23 May 1945 that commanders may waive the requirements of an authorized vacancy to appoint temporarily to the next higher grade any enlisted person below the first pay grade who is returned to United States military control from a status of: (1) internee, (2) missing in action, (3) evading capture in enemy held territory, or (4) prisoner of war (including those repatriated under the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02171
This provision does not apply to Army or Air Force officers, nor does it authorize promotions for former POWs. They reviewed the record of the applicant’s spouse and all applicable regulations in regard to POW promotions and can find no documentation/provision to support an earlier promotion date to the grade of first lieutenant. The evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00396
He was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant while a POW, and should have been promoted to captain upon his release. Applicant has not provided any evidence that he was recommended for promotion to captain. Additionally, without the applicant’s record, they cannot determine whether he should have been promoted under any other provisions in policy or law HQ AFPC/DPPPO’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01237
On 2 April 1944, the applicant was appointed a temporary second lieutenant (2LT), Air Corps, Army of the United States, and was voluntarily ordered to extended active duty. On 23 October 1945, the applicant was recommended for promotion to the grade of first lieutenant (1LT) based on his service record and because it was presumed that if he had not been a POW, he would have been promoted. He was promoted to the grade of captain, Reserve of the Air Force, with an effective date of 1 July 1955.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024052
Counsel states the applicant was promoted to SGT according to records from the Provost Marshal General's Office and other documentation that are included with his application. Evidence shows the applicant's discharge document does not contain this entry. The Board requests that the ARBA, CMD Promulgation provide administrative relief by adding to Item 55 (Remarks) of the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 "PRISONER OF WAR, Company E, 12th Infantry, 20 December 1944 to June 1945" and providing...