RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03812
INDEX CODE: 107.00; 131.05
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to show he was promoted to the grade of first
lieutenant based on his status as a Prisoner of War (POW), he be awarded
the Silver Star, and he be given appropriate recognition (award) for
actions performed during a POW forced march.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He saved the lives of many POWs during a forced march from the prison camp
of Nuremberg to the prison at Moosburg. The POWs were observed and almost
attacked by an American P-51 pilot who mistakenly thought them to be German
soldiers. The other POWs ran and took cover in a shallow ditch, but he
stayed in the road waving off the incoming P-51 as it twice flew over him.
Because he did not run, the pilot was convinced that they were POWs, and
flew off waving his wings. This act deserves a special medal because he
saved the lives of many POWs.
In support of the application, the applicant submits a Military Record and
Report of Separation - Certificate of Service, documents, personal
statements and excerpts of records pertaining to his POW status, and a Book
of Mission. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant’s military personnel records were destroyed by fire in the
National Personnel Records Center in 1973. The following information was
extracted from documents provided by the applicant.
Applicant entered active duty as a commissioned officer in the Army of the
United States, Air Corps, on 2 October 1943. He performed duties as a B-17
Bombadier during the period of 25 February 1944 to 10 May 1945. He was a
POW from 18 March 1944 to 15 May 1945, a period of approximately 1 year, 1
month and 21 days.
He participated in the Romo-Arno, Air Combat-Balkans, and North Apennines
battles and campaigns. The applicant was separated in the grade of second
lieutenant by reason of Convenience of the Government (Demobilization) on
5 December 1945. He was credited with 10 months and 18 days of continental
service and 1 year, 3 months and 15 days of foreign service.
On 9 March 2004, DPPPR provided the applicant with detailed information and
instructions concerning his request, and advised him that he was entitled
to the following awards: Purple Heart Medal, POW Medal, American Campaign
Medal, European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal (2 Bronze Stars), and
World War II Victory Medal. The applicant responded, and provided
additional documents. This letter, with attachments, is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPPO recommends approval of the applicant’s request for promotion.
DPPPO states that requirements for promotion were governed by Army
regulation 605-12, Temporary Promotions in the Army of the United States,
24 Jul 1944. On 9 December 1944, this regulation was amended to allow
second lieutenants that had completed 18 months of service to be promoted
to first lieutenant without regard to Table of Organization or allotment
vacancies. Although there is no documentation available to support the
applicant’s claim, based on AFBCMR decision dated 26 May 1989. DPPPO
believes the applicant would have been promoted to the grade of first
lieutenant either as a result of his internment or under the provisions of
the terminal leave promotion program. DPPPO’s complete evaluation is at
Exhibit C.
HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the award of
the Silver Star, and “another medal.” DPPPR states to be awarded the
Silver Star Medal or “another medal” a written recommendation has to be
signed by a recommending official and endorsed by the next higher official
in the chain of command. There are no documents in the applicant’s service
record or among the documents submitted that indicate he was recommended
for these awards. DPPPR is unable to verify the applicant’s entitlement to
the Silver Star and “another medal.” DPPPR’s complete evaluation is at
Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant stated that he appreciates the recommendation for promotion
but was surprised to find that the military could not do additional
research to find documentation supporting his request. He reiterated the
awards that he has already received (Exhibit G).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice with respect to the applicant’s request for
promotion. The purpose of the POW promotion policy established in 1945 was
to provide equitable promotion consideration for members who most likely
would have been promoted but for their absence from military control. The
applicant was credited with approximately 2 years, 2 months and 3 days of
commissioned service, of which 1 year 3 months and 15 days was foreign
service. It appears that the applicant met the criteria contained in
Change 1 to AR 605-12 for promotion consideration to first lieutenant while
he was in POW status. The applicant was also eligible for promotion
consideration under the Terminal Leave promotion policy. It is highly
probable the absence of any record of a promotion consideration in this
case was the result of an oversight during the period of turmoil associated
with repatriation and demobilization. In view of the above and in
recognition of the applicant’s service to the nation, we believe that any
doubt in this matter should be resolved in his favor and that his records
should be corrected to show he was promoted to first lieutenant on the day
preceding his release from active duty.
4. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice with respect to the applicant’s requests
for award of the Silver Star and another (unspecified) medal. The
applicant requests he be awarded the Silver Star and an appropriate medal
for actions performed during a POW forced march. However, in the absence
of evidence other than the applicant’s own submission that support his
rendition of the cited events and lead us to believe his actions met the
criteria for the requested awards, we agree with the assessment of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility concerning the applicant’s request.
While we appreciate and honor the applicant’s service to his country, in
view of the above and absent persuasive evidence showing his records are in
error or unjust concerning additional recognition beyond that afforded by
the Air Force office of primary responsibility, the applicant’s requests
are not be favorably considered.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that effective 4 December 1945, he was
promoted to the grade of first lieutenant, Army of the United States (Air
Corps), and, on 5 December 1945, he was honorably relieved from active duty
in the grade of first lieutenant, rather than in the grade of second
lieutenant.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered document number BC-2003-03812
in Executive Session on 29 July 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member
Mr. Vance C. Lineberger, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Aug 03, with attachments.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPO, dated.18 February 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, dated 28 April 04.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 May 04.
Exhibit F. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPRA, dated 9 March 04 and
Applicant’s response, dated 30 March 2004, with
attachments.
Exhibit G. Applicant’s Rebuttal, dated 2 June 04.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-03812
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that effective 4 December
1945, he was promoted to the grade of first lieutenant, Army of the
United States (Air Corps), and, on 5 December 1945, he was honorably
relieved from active duty in the grade of first lieutenant, rather than
in the grade of second lieutenant.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03241
He states, since there are no records available to support a promotion as a member of the 55th Fighter Group, in 1944, he requests that he receive a promotion to first lieutenant, effective 24 December 1944 as authorized by Congress in 2001. Since he would then be a first lieutenant, at the time of his promotion at Wright-Patterson AFB, he requests that promotion, effective that date, be to captain. As stated, although the applicant was promoted to first lieutenant, we do not have any...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01237
On 2 April 1944, the applicant was appointed a temporary second lieutenant (2LT), Air Corps, Army of the United States, and was voluntarily ordered to extended active duty. On 23 October 1945, the applicant was recommended for promotion to the grade of first lieutenant (1LT) based on his service record and because it was presumed that if he had not been a POW, he would have been promoted. He was promoted to the grade of captain, Reserve of the Air Force, with an effective date of 1 July 1955.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03278
The Board notes that upon review of his available records, it was determined by competent authority that the applicant was held as a prisoner-of-war from 29 May 1943 to 14 May 1945 and his records were administratively corrected on 9 March 2006, to reflect award of the POW Medal. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00199
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00199 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was promoted to the grade of first lieutenant prior to the time he was a Prisoner of War (POW) and that he was promoted to the grade of captain based on his status as a...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01716
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01716 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he received an Oak Leaf Cluster to the Purple Heart (PH) for being a prisoner of war (POW). DPPPR further states the applicant has not provided any documentation to show he was injured or wounded...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02171
This provision does not apply to Army or Air Force officers, nor does it authorize promotions for former POWs. They reviewed the record of the applicant’s spouse and all applicable regulations in regard to POW promotions and can find no documentation/provision to support an earlier promotion date to the grade of first lieutenant. The evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01851 INDEX CODE: 130.00 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Prisoner of War (POW) medal for his time as prisoner of war during WWII. He was given POW status; however, he has not been given the medal. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02027
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02027 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). The applicant flew 32 combat missions as a B-24 pilot and was a prisoner of war from 31 December 1944 to 8 May 1945. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair AFBCMR 02-00931 MEMORANDUM FOR THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02623
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02623 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS: Award of the Silver Star Medal and the Purple Heart Medal. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was recommended for the Silver Star Medal (SSM) for actions on 8 April 1945, but it...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00396
He was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant while a POW, and should have been promoted to captain upon his release. Applicant has not provided any evidence that he was recommended for promotion to captain. Additionally, without the applicant’s record, they cannot determine whether he should have been promoted under any other provisions in policy or law HQ AFPC/DPPPO’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...