RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03194
INDEX NUMBER: 131.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that she be considered for promotion to the grade
of major by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY97D (5 November
1997) Central Major Selection Board, with the Officer Performance
Report (OPR) closing 5 November 1997 included in her Officer Selection
Record. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and
provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application
be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response
to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or
injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated
in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record
and have not been adequately rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive
evidence applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate
regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not
applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not reasonably available at the time the application was
filed.
Members of the Board, Messrs. Michael P. Higgins, Patrick R. Wheeler,
and Philip Sheuerman, considered this application on 2 March 1999 in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603 and
the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
MICHAEL P. HIGGINS
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
E. Applicant's Response
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). While the applicant may believe he received unfair treatment due to not fitting the perceptions of his senior rater, the Performance Recommendation Form PRF) rendered for the CY94 major selection board appears appropriate in both narrative and overall recommendation and comments were congxuent with%he applicant’s record of...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS JUL 1 4 IN THE MATTER OF: rn COUNSEL: NONE DOCKET NUMBER: 97-03526 HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that the Officer Selection Brief reviewed by the Calendar Year (CY) 1997C (16 June 1997) Major Promotion Board be amended under the Assignment History section to reflect Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) 36P4 versus 3384 on the 15 May 1996 entry, and that she be considered for promotion by Special Selection...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). - MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: ANGMPPU 3500 Fetchet Avenue Andrews AFB MD 20331-5157 SUBJE rection of Military Records 1 9 4 7 - 1 9 9 7 0 3 3UiJ 1997 The attached Application for Correction of Military Records submitted by the applicant, a...
DPPPA stated each officer eligible for promotion consideration by the CY97C board received an officer preselection brief (OPB) several months prior to the date the board convened in July 1997. It was the applicant’s responsibility to have the erroneous information corrected prior to the board or, as a minimum, to notify the Board of the erroneous duty titles on his OSB by letter prior to the board if he believed it important to his promotion consideration. Several months prior to the...
AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1998-01222
DPPPA stated each officer eligible for promotion consideration by the CY97C board received an officer preselection brief (OPB) several months prior to the date the board convened in July 1997. It was the applicant’s responsibility to have the erroneous information corrected prior to the board or, as a minimum, to notify the Board of the erroneous duty titles on his OSB by letter prior to the board if he believed it important to his promotion consideration. Several months prior to the...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant’s request on 17 July 1998. The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.