RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-03122
INDEX CODE121.03
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED:
Applicant requests leave compensation for 56 days of down time, 8 days
of missed Federal holidays, and 48 days for missed weekends for his
sacrifice as a member in a permanent change of station position, and
in light of new policies of time off after long deployments.
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and
provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application
be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). Applicant's response
to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit D.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or
injustice to warrant corrective action. Military personnel are
provided 30 days of leave each fiscal year, with provisions to carry
over up to 60 days. This program is intended, in part, to compensate
military personnel for missed holidays or lost weekends. There are
also MAJCOM programs for post-deployment stand-downs, but these do not
apply to permanently assigned personnel supporting contingency
operations. Although the applicant believes that something additional
should be done for personnel permanently assigned to very demanding
tours, it is not a function of the AFBCMR to set leave policy for the
Air Force. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to
which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb
the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not reasonably available at the time the application was
filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Douglas J. Heady, Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, and
Mr. Joseph A. Roj considered this application on 4 March 1999 in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and
the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Advisory Opinion
C. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
D. Applicant's Response
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2001-02018
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02018 INDEX CODE: 136.00 COUNSEL: ANTHONY W. WALLUK HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to show she was not discharged with severance pay but was permanently retired because of physical disability with a minimal combined compensable rating of 50% but more appropriately 70%. A complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03035
In fact, it appears that he was not charged for any leave from the time he arrived at his new duty station until he commenced work, a period of approximately six weeks. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSFM, dated 2 December 2002, w/atchs. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 December 2002.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03035
In fact, it appears that he was not charged for any leave from the time he arrived at his new duty station until he commenced work, a period of approximately six weeks. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSFM, dated 2 December 2002, w/atchs. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 December 2002.
The AFBCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the records is warranted and the application should be denied (Exhibit C). Prior to that date, an evaluation of 30% was assigned for severe, frequent attacks. Accordingly, in view of the foregoing, I believe the applicant’s medical condition at the time of his retirement warrants a higher disability rating.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01782
(Exhibit C) ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. The AFI does not require the commanders approval for early testing while on the 42-day acclimatization period from deployment. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Dec 13.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. On 6 Dec 96, officials within the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force directed that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01278
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K concurs with the recommendation from AFRC/RMG to deny the applicants request for pay and points for the period May Jul 13. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Exhibit D. Letter,...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . Officials within the office of the Secretary of the Air Force reviewed the case file and directed that the applicant be discharged with severance pay and given a 20 percent compensable rating. The disability laws of Title 10, USC require the military services to rate disabilities based on their current condition, at the time...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03304
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She should have been discharged via a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) and should have received disability compensation given the severity of her medical conditions. The complete SGPF evaluation is at Exhibit B. NGB/A1PS concurs with the SGPFs advisory and therefore recommends no action be taken unless the applicant can provide documentation showing her medical conditions were deemed service connected...
However, if the Board voids the Article 15 as requested or removes the reduction as part of the punishment, the effective date and date of rank would revert to the original date of 1 July 1992. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 21 December 1998, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant for review and response within 30 days. ...