RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER 98-03049
INDEX CODE: 128.00
XXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be reimbursed for expenses incurred related to inactive duty training
(IDT) performed 13 - 18 March 1995.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
On 30 January 1995, he submitted to HQ ARPC an AF Form 1289 requesting
approval to perform a split active duty training (ADT) annual tour and IDT
in conjunction therewith. The Published Reserve Order No , did not
initially contain language in the Remarks Section authorizing a split
annual tour or IDT training. On 10 February 1995, he contacted HQ ARPC
regarding the missing authorizations. He explained that unless orders were
amended to authorize billeting for associated IDT training, he would not
accept the orders. On 3 March 1995, HQ ARPC published a “Request and
Authorization for Change of Administrative Orders” and upon receipt, he
telephone HQ ARPC to confirm that IDTs, and related billeting/travel
expenses, were authorized. HQ ARPC referred him to Item 7, the “Accounting
Citation,” and specifically P&A (per diem and allowances), and confirmed
that the associated numbers authorized payment for billeting associated
with IDT training. He accepted orders and completed both ADT and IDT
training. On 19 March 1995, he submitted his DD Forms 1351-2 and 1351-2c
(Travel Vouchers). He was denied reimbursement of expenses related to
authorized IDT performed 12 - 18 March 1995. This denial was (is)
inconsistent with his previous IDT reimbursement experiences, the
experiences of other Air Force members similarly situated, and the explicit
assurances of in the orders branch at HQ ARPC that such IDT expenses
would be reimbursed.
In support of the appeal, applicant submits an Application for Active Duty
Training, Request and Authorization for Active Duty Training/Active Duty
Tour, Request and Authorization for Change
of Administrative Orders, Travel Voucher, Schedule of Expenses, charges,
and HQ 11th Wing/DPMM memorandum, dated 17 March 1995.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant is currently serving in the United States Air Force Reserve
(USAFR) in the grade of lieutenant colonel.
Applicant performed an active duty training annual tour for the period 5-12
March 1995 at the Armed Services Blood Program Office, , . He also
performed inactive duty training in conjunction with active duty training
for the period 13 - 18 March 1995 at the same location.
Reserve Order (RO), HQ ARPC, 8 February 1995 was issued but did not
authorize the applicant to perform an IDT period in conjunction with his
annual tour.
RO JZ-00834, HQ ARPC, 3 March 1995, was published authorizing the applicant
to perform an IDT period (13 - 18 March 1995) in conjunction with his
annual tour.
Applicant was paid authorized reimbursements for his annual tour for the
period 5 - 12 March 1995 and was denied all expenses incurred during his
IDT period IAW the Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Customer Assistance, HQ ARPC/DR,
reviewed the application and states that during the applicant’s annual tour
period, he was reimbursed all allowable entitlements, and he was correctly
denied lodging, per diem rate for meals and travel entitlements for his IDT
period. The JFTR specifies that when performing IDTs at a member’s
designated post of duty, the member is not entitled to travel or
transportation expenses. Since the applicant performed his IDT period at
the Armed Services Blood Program Office, , VA, which was his designated
post of duty, this applies to this case. The JFTR does allow for
reimbursement of lodging expense incurred during an IDT period only when
these expenses are in government billeting or government contracted
quarters. Since the applicant stayed at the , which was not under
government contract during his IDT period, he was not reimbursed for his
lodging expenses. Although the applicant claims that after receiving his
amended order, he contacted ARPC and was told that he would be paid for his
IDT expenses, he was misinformed. The Comptroller General has ruled that
the Department of Defense is not liable for any misinformation provided to
members when the entitlement clearly does not exist. They recommend the
applicant's request be denied.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 15 February 1999, for review and response. As of this date, no response
has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. After reviewing the evidence of
record, the majority of the Board is of the opinion that the applicant took
the proper steps to ensure that his orders were correct and that he would
be reimbursed for the cost of lodging, per diem rate for meals, and
transportation expenses incurred by an Inactive Duty Training (IDT) period
he performed. It is noted that when his basic order was issued and did not
authorize him to perform an IDT period in conjunction with his annual tour,
he requested an amendment to his order. As a result, RO, HQ ARPC, 3 Mar
95, was published authorizing the applicant to perform an IDT period in
conjunction with his annual tour. In view of the foregoing, and in an
effort to offset any possibility of an injustice, the majority of the Board
believes that the applicant’s record should be corrected to the extent
indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was authorized lodging, per
diem, and allowances, by competent authority, during his inactive duty
training on 12 March 1995 through 18 March 1995 and; that, he be reimbursed
for expenses incurred in the amount of $902.53.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 13 July 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Panel Chair
Mr. William H. Anderson, Member
Ms. Barbara J. White-Olson, Member
By a majority vote, the Board voted to correct the records, as recommended.
Mr. Anderson voted to deny applicant's request, but does not desire to
submit a Minority Report. The following documentary evidence was
considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Oct 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DR, dated 1 Feb 99.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 15 Feb 99.
Panel Chair
INDEX CODE: 128
AFBCMR 98-03049
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXX, XXXX, be corrected to show that he was authorized
lodging, per diem, and allowances, by competent authority, during his
inactive duty training on 12 March 1995 through 18 March 1995 and; that, he
be reimbursed for expenses incurred in the amount of $902.53.
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001470
The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was on annual training (AT) or active duty for special work (ADSW) orders from 12 June 2011 to 21 June 2011 and reimbursement of travel expenses. Army Regulation 140-145 (Individual Mobilization Augmentation (IMA) Program), paragraph 3-1 (Personnel Management and Administration) states IMA Soldiers are not authorized travel expenses or a per diem while performing periods of IDT. IMA Soldiers are not authorized to receive travel...
# DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97-00442 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: .. of the Departmeat of the Air Force relating to- e corrected to show that he had no other alternative but to mercial travel office (CTO) not under...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03022
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03022 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed $1,293.13 to offset Temporary Lodging Expenses (TLE) incurred with her Permanent Change of Station (PCS) assignment to Ramstein Air Base (AB), Germany. A request was submitted to the Secretary of the Air Force Financial...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00745
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When she was placed on active duty orders her Home of Record (HOR) was considered within commuting distance of her duty station and she was consequently not eligible to receive per diem and lodging entitlements. In accordance with Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR), SAF/FM, and HQ USAF/DPFJ policy, mobilization orders shall not be amended for the purpose of changing the members’ HOR/Place of Entry...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051454C070420
He also concluded that no reimbursement exists because there was no evidence of “official” travel supported by official orders for the period of time the applicant was attached for duty at Fort Bragg. k. The DOHA, based on Comptroller General decisions and provisions of the JFTR, denied the applicant reimbursement for per diem for the period the applicant was attached and was present at Fort Bragg because it was determined to be disciplinary travel. c. Notwithstanding the determination...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011490
Although the documentation is not available, the available evidence indicates the applicant was denied reimbursement for lodging because he had stayed with a friend. In this opinion it is noted that JFTR, paragraph 4129E is clear, in that lodging costs reimbursement is not authorized for a member who stays with a friend or relative while on TDY. While the applicant was authorized by his command to stay with a friend, the JFTR precludes reimbursement for any amount paid out in such an arrangement.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01313
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Hq USAF/ILGT recommends the applicant be reimbursed in the amount of $419.00. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected as indicated below. CATHLYNN SPARKS Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-01313 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United...
IAW the Joint Federal Travel Regulation, Vol 1, par U5705B, “…a member is not entitled to TLE due to a move when entering active duty (except for enlisted members reporting to their first PDS).” The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. The Traffic Management Division, AFPC/DPAMP, evaluated the applicant’s request for remission of the debt for the unauthorized airline ticket. The Board does not agree with the recommendation made by AF/DPRCC to deny the applicant reimbursement for TLE. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087112C070212
The applicant requests, in effect, that his convalescent leave status during the period his unit was ordered to active duty be changed to reduced duty so as not to be charged with a debt resulting from this leave. c. When the applicant became ill or injured and was placed on convalescent leave at while at Fort Benning, the JFTR required payment of his per diem to cease even though he remained at his TDY station and was still obligated to pay for his off-post lodging. However, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087104C070212
The applicant requests, in effect, that his convalescent leave status during the period his unit was ordered to active duty be changed to reduced duty so as not to be charged with a debt resulting from this leave. c. When the applicant became ill or injured and was placed on convalescent leave at while at Fort Benning, the JFTR required payment of his per diem to cease even though he remained at his TDY station and was still obligated to pay for his off-post lodging. However, the...