RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02060
INDEX CODES: 107.00, 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that her records be corrected to reflect award of
the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon, her inactive service be
changed to active service, and her character of service and narrative
reason for separation be changed. Applicant's submission is at
Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and
provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application
be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the
applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
By letter, dated 7 Aug 98, the USAF Education and Training Branch,
AFPC/DPPAT, notified the applicant that, after reviewing her records,
they found she was separated from the Air Force prior to completing
her initial technical training. Consequently it would be
inappropriate for her DD Form 214 (Item 14 - Military Education) to
reflect course completion. Accordingly, her records correctly showed
her military training status.
After careful consideration of applicant's requests that her records
be corrected to reflect award of the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship
Ribbon, that her inactive service be changed to active service, and
that her character of service and narrative reason for separation be
changed, and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient
evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The
facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based
on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate
standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing
record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not reasonably available at the time the application was
filed.
Members of the Board Ms. Patricia J. Zarodkiewicz, Ms. Dorothy P.
Loeb, and Ms. Olga M. Crerar considered this application on 23 Mar 99
in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603 and
the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
PATRICIA J. ZARODKIEWICZ
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinions
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03018
On 9 Sep 08, HQ AFPC/DPSITE informed the applicant that block 15a of his DD Form 214 pertains to individuals entering active duty under the Veterans’ Education Assistance program (VEAP). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR...
RECORD AIR FORCE BOARD FOR OF PROCEEDINGS CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS ;gJJ I 3 -sS IN THE MATTER OF: -.-- DOCKET NUMBER: 9 8 - 0 0 6 3 8 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No Applicant requests that his DD Form 214 ( C e r t i f i c a t e of Release o r Discharge From Active Duty) be c o r r e c t e d t o r e f l e c t award of t h e Small A r m s Expert Marksmanship Ribbon. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02479 INDEX CODE: 110.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation (Personality Disorder) and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed so that she may be allowed to return to the military. ...
Exhibit B. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 14 Dec 98. Exhibit E. Letter, applicant, dated 2 Jun 99.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
A copy of the complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, reviewed the case and provided the pertinent information regarding the applicant’s demotion. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded the narrative reason for his discharge should be changed or his grade restored. Exhibit B.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02991 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to one that will allow her entry into the Air Force or Air Force Reserve. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit...