RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01588
INDEX NUMBER: 128.05
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her records be corrected to reflect she was authorized a Selective
Reenlistment Bonus (SRB), based on Multiple 2.5 rather than .5, in
conjunction with her reenlistment on 3 July 1996.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
During her reenlistment processing, she was repeatedly counseled that
she was entitled to an SRB based on a multiple of 2.5. On 2 July
1996, she was advised by telephone that her SRB would be based on a
multiple of .5 instead of 2.5. She received no written counseling of
this prior to executing her reenlistment (on 3 July 1996).
The message which informed her Military Personnel Flight (MPF) that
her SRB was being reduced was dated 29 April 1996. According to the
governing Air Force Instruction she was entitled to written
notification of the pending reduction, which would have allowed her
ample time to consider her options and possibly make other plans for
her future.
In support of her request, applicant provided her expanded comments,
and documentation associated with her SRB. (Exhibit A)
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant contracted her initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force
on 19 May 1987 for a period of four years. She was honorably
discharged on 30 September 1990 for the sole purpose of immediate
reenlistment on 1 October 1990.
On 1 October 1990, she reenlisted for a period of six years, with an
established date of separation (DOS) of 30 September 1996. At the
time of this enlistment, she was entitled to a Zone A, Multiple 2,
SRB. She was honorably discharged on 2 July 1996 for the sole purpose
of immediate reenlistment on 3 July 1996.
On 3 July 1996, she reenlisted for a period of six years, with
entitlement to a Zone B, Multiple one-half, SRB.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Skills Management Branch, AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed this application
and recommended denial.
DPPAE stated that on 23 April 96, HQ USAF/DPXF announced SRB changes
which reduced the applicant’s SRB from 2.5 to .5, effective 30 May 96.
Personnel who were within the three-month period prior to their
expiration of term of service (ETS) were considered “affected airmen”
and could reenlist before the SRB reduction. In this case, the
applicant’s ETS of 30 Sep 96 rendered her ineligible to reenlist until
30 Jun 96. As such, she was not eligible to collect the higher SRB of
2.5 since she could not reenlist prior to 30 May 96 - the effective
date of the SRB change.
On 3 Jul 96, the applicant reenlisted and collected an SRB Zone B,
Multiple one-half. However, the reenlistment documents initially
prepared reflected an erroneous 2.5 SRB payment. This error was
subsequently corrected to reflect a Multiple .5. Also, the applicant
was fully aware of the correct SRB entitlement as substantiated by the
Chief of Military Personnel Flight (see letter appended at Exhibit A).
(Exhibit C)
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 3
August 1998 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date,
no response has been received by this office.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable injustice warranting corrective action. In this
regard, we note that the reduction in the Selective Reenlistment Bonus
(SRB) in applicant’s Air Force Specialty Code was announced on 29
April 1996. However, as evidenced by the applicant’s supporting
documentation, she continued to be advised that she would be entitled
to the higher level of the bonus, i.e., Multiple 2.5. In our opinion,
it appears that the applicant made her decision to reenlist based on
being entitled to the higher SRB bonus. Had she been properly
counseled, she would have had an opportunity to make other choices
with regard to whether or not she would reenlist. In view of the
foregoing, and to preclude any further injustice to the applicant, we
believe any doubt should be resolved in her favor. Accordingly, we
recommend that her records be corrected as indicated below.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. She was honorably discharged on 28 May 1996 and reenlisted
in the Regular Air Force on 29 May 1996 for a period of six (6), and
at the time of her enlistment on 29 May 1996, she was entitled to a
Zone B, Multiple 2.5, Selective Reenlistment Bonus.
b. Her enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 3 July 1996 for a
period of six (6) years, be declared void.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 14 January 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Martha Maust, Panel Chair
Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member
Ms. Ann L. Heidig, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Jun 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 9 Jul 98.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 3 Aug 98.
MARTHA MAUST
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 98-01588
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to [APPLICANT], be corrected to show that:
a. She was honorably discharged on 28 May 1996 and
reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on 29 May 1996 for a period of six
(6), and at the time of her enlistment on 29 May 1996, she was
entitled to a Zone B, Multiple 2.5, Selective Reenlistment Bonus.
b. Her enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 3 July
1996 for a period of six (6) years, be, and hereby is, declared void.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1998-00187
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Skills Management Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed the application and states that although miscounseling was confirmed by the MPF, with regard to applicant’s eligibility for the SRB he is requesting, the applicant was still not entitled to a full six-year SRB based on three extensions of enlistment. HQ AFPC/DPPAE states that if partial relief is granted, because of the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02994
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She reenlisted on 18 December 2001 in zone A for a 1.5 multiple SRB. The SRB review had not been announced as of the date the applicant reenlisted and therefore the MPF was not able to brief the applicant it had changed. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application, AFBCMR Docket No.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02994
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She reenlisted on 18 December 2001 in zone A for a 1.5 multiple SRB. The SRB review had not been announced as of the date the applicant reenlisted and therefore the MPF was not able to brief the applicant it had changed. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application, AFBCMR Docket No.
-- AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Skills Management Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed the application and states that although miscounseling was confirmed by the MPF, with regard to applicant's eligibility for the SRB he is requesting, the applicant was still not entitled to a full six-year SRB based on three extensions of enlistment. HQ AFPC/DPPAE states that if partial relief is granted, because of the applicant being miscounseled, he would need a constructive reenlistment and be entitled...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01201
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01201 INDEX NUMBER: 128.05 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Oct 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be paid based on the full five years he reenlisted for on 8 Feb 05 and not be reduced by the time remaining on the 23-month extension...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02427 INDEX CODE 128.05 112.07 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her nine-month extension executed on 11 Jan 02 be voided (per Exhibit E) and she be allowed to reenlist for six years so she may qualify for a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). HQ AFPC/DPPAER informally advised the AFBCMR Staff...
AFBCMR 02-00144 INDEX CODE: 128.14 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02558
We note that, at the time the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) was announced for the applicant’s career field, she had planned to extend her enlistment rather than reenlist. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that she was honorably discharged on 2 July 2003 rather than 31 July 2003 and reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1995-01615A
ADDUNDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 95-01615 INDEX NUMBER: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His zone A, multiple two Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB), received in conjunction with his 13 April 1995 reenlistment, be computed on four years of service, rather than three years. The enlistment contract provided by...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 95-01615 INDEX NUMBER: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His zone A, multiple two Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB), received in conjunction with his 13 April 1995 reenlistment, be computed on four years of service, rather than three years. The enlistment contract provided by...