RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00452
INDEX CODE 128.10 113.01
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His indebtedness (over $14,000) to the Air Force be waived.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He should not be held responsible for the stipend debt. After careful
consideration of whether the risks balanced the benefits, he had
agreed to certain requirements in return for certain benefits. He
later learned that he had been miscounseled regarding the Air Force
Ready Reserve Stipend Program (AFRRSP) and the Loan Replacement
Program (LRP) by the Reserve medical recruiter who worked the original
appointment application. Also, the Medical Indoctrination for Medical
Service Officer (MIMSO) course, which requires time off from work, was
extended from two weeks to a little over 30 days. He would not have
made the decision to undertake all the requirements, and join the
Reserves, if the terms had been presented as they were subsequently.
He believed he had no other course of action when he submitted his
resignation from the Air Force Reserves (USAFR). He should have been
counseled that inactive status upon graduation from his anesthesia
program may have been an option and a fair way to bypass the
inaccuracies in the terms of his obligations.
A copy of applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letters prepared by
the appropriate offices of the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no
need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
OFFICE OF PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY EVALUATIONS:
The Director, Health Services Individual Reserve Programs, HQ ARPC/SG,
reviewed this appeal and indicates that, while it is possible to
participate in more than one incentive program, the associated
obligations are consecutive, not concurrent. Consequently, the AFRRSP
obligation would have to be deferred until participation in the LRP
was completed. Also, the change [in the military indoctrination
program] could not have been predicted at the time of applicant’s
initial appointment. Some AFRRSP participants were required to serve
their obligation in a non-paid Selected Reserve position (Individual
Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) or Unit Programs) or the Inactive Ready
Reserves (IRR). However, they remain mobilization assets and have not
indicated, as the applicant did, a desire to withdraw from the program
and resign from the USAFR. Denial is recommended as all actions taken
were those requested by the applicant.
A copy of the complete Air Force evaluation, with attachments, is at
Exhibit C.
The Chief, Claims Branch, DFAS-DE/FYCC, advises that, with interest
and penalties, applicant’s original indebtedness of $14,637.02 amounts
to $14,844.52.
A copy of the complete DFAS evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE EVALUATIONS:
Applicant reviewed the evaluations and contends that he was never told
that if no position was available, he may be obligated to the Unit
program. He doesn’t know what this is or what this means. He is again
surprised to continually discover information about what he was or was
not supposed to know or do in this program. He did not want something
for nothing; he only wanted to be handled appropriately and fairly.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
The Staff Judge Advocate (SJA), HQ ARPC/JA, reviewed the appeal and
advises that the applicant was assessed recoupment because of his
resignation. His classmates, due to the unavailability of nurse
anesthetist slots, were placed in non-participating status and were
also relieved of their obligation to repay the stipend in question.
The applicant’s assertions of “mishandling” and misinformation appear
to be largely substantiated by ARPC/SG’s advisory. The stipend
program is established by Title 38, USC, Section 7651. However,
although the program itself is established by statute, the SJA is
unable to find any authority forbidding the AFBCMR from waiving
indebtedness stemming from a stipend if the Board finds he has
provided sufficient evidence of probable material error or injustice.
A copy of the complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit G.
The Acting Director, Health Services, HQ ARPC/SG, further evaluated
the case and indicates that, during the course of his AFRRSP
participation, the MIMSO course was changed to Commissioned Officer’s
Training, requiring a longer period of time. As this was directed by
higher command, SG could not predict this change and had no
alternative but to comply. The acknowledged miscounselings took place
between the applicant and his AF Health Professions Recruiter, so the
author is unable to expound on the possible interpretation. However,
it appears he was incorrectly led to believe the associated
obligations for LRP and AFRRSP could be repaid concurrently vice
consecutively. It further appears he was mislead to believe he was
guaranteed IMA status, which was also incorrect. The Acting Director
provides a copy of applicant’s original contract. The applicant self-
eliminated from the AFRRSP, opting to repay all funds received and
subsequently tendering his resignation. He now appears aware of other
members who were transferred into the IRR upon graduation from their
respective programs because of manning overstrengths, which existed at
the time. Although these members are in a non-participating status,
they remain mobilization assets and are subject to serve should the
need arise. The applicant was offered this option but elected self-
elimination.
A copy of the complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit H.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
The applicant reviewed the evaluations and counters that his “self-
elimination” with subsequent resignation happened because he believed
there was no other option. As the SJA has commented in the advisory,
he believed that both ARPC and himself considered his concerns
substantiated. The only options presented to him were: 1) accept the
misinformation he originally was given and fulfill the obligation
under new and difficult terms, or 2) separate from the program. At no
time during this entire ordeal was he ever offered the option of
transferring into the IRR or any program like it. Unfortunately, ARPC
was unable to offer suggestions except to serve in the program under
the new terms. His first exposure to this option was after he had been
discharged and an Air Force recruiter contacted him about transferring
to the IRR due to a lack of IMA anesthetists positions available. He
objects to ARPC suggesting that he refused an offer that may have
helped remedy his situation. The program Fact Sheets are dated June
1998 and obviously not available to him at the time of his recruitment
or participation. He encloses all the information given to him related
to the program incentives. He contends that none of the outlines are
very specific, but the new Fact Sheet ARPC provides does contain
information related to consecutive, versus concurrent repayment.
Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit J.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice to warrant partial
relief. The applicant has requested that repayment of the AFRRSP
stipend be waived. Apparently some of the late 1996 and early 1997
AFRRSP classmates misunderstood the associated obligations for LRP and
AFRRSP. In addition, there were changes in the initial officer
training program and available slots were reduced due to manning
overstrengths. As a result, some individuals transferred into the IRR
upon graduation from their respective programs. Although these
individuals are in a non-participating status, they remain
mobilization assets and are subject to serve should the need arise.
The applicant contends he was never made aware of the option of
transferring to the IRR. Given the confusion that appears to have
existed during this time, we believe he either may not have been told,
or failed to understand, what his options were. We do not believe the
applicant should be freed from all indebtedness to the Government;
however, given his particular circumstances, we are persuaded that he
be should be afforded the same means of serving his obligation as
other AFRRSP participants. Therefore, we recommend his records be
corrected to reflect that, instead of resigning from the Reserves, he
was transferred to the IRR.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. On 14 August 1997, competent authority approved his request
to transfer to the Inactive Ready Reserves (IRR) for the purpose of
serving his Air Force Ready Reserve Stipend Program (AFRRSP)
obligation.
b. He was not discharged from the Air Force Reserves on
2 September 1997, but on that date he transferred to the IRR.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 6 April 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
Dr. Gerald B. Kauvar, Member
Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Feb 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ ARPC/SG, dated 9 Apr 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, DFAS-DE/FYCC, dated 13 May 98.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 15 Jun 98.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 26 Jun 98.
Exhibit G. Letter, HQ ARPC/JA, dated 21 Jan 99, w/atchs.
Exhibit H. Letter, HQ ARPC/SG, dated 27 Jan 99, w/atchs.
Exhibit I. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 15 Feb 99.
Exhibit J. Letter, Applicant, dated 19 Feb 99, w/atchs.
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 98-00452
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. On 14 August 1997, competent authority approved his
request to transfer to the Inactive Ready Reserves (IRR) for the
purpose of serving his Air Force Ready Reserve Stipend Program
(AFRRSP) obligation.
b. He was not discharged from the Air Force Reserves on
2 September 1997, but on that date he transferred to the IRR.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00452
A copy of the complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. The Acting Director, Health Services, HQ ARPC/SG, further evaluated the case and indicates that, during the course of his AFRRSP participation, the MIMSO course was changed to Commissioned Officer’s Training, requiring a longer period of time. The applicant has requested that repayment of the AFRRSP stipend be waived. Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected to reflect that, instead of resigning from the...
Because of the manning shortage of clinical nurses in the AFRes at that time, individuals with an Associate Degree in Nursing were entitled to a stipend under the Air Force Ready Reserve Stipend Program (AFRRSP) to pursue a Baccalaureate Degree in Nursing (BSN). Applying this argument to the stipend program generally would place an obligation on the Air Force to personally notify each affected officer prior to removing a specialty from the list of critical specialties. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00703
They also opine that the applicant’s claim fails to address the central issue in the case; that by operation of law his fate in the Air Force Reserve was decided when he was twice non- selected for promotion, before he contacted HQ ARPC to apply for the IMA program. The applicant states that ARPC/JA’s claim that at no point between 3 Jun 03 and 5 Aug 03 did he inform them that he desired to become an IMA is incorrect. _______________________________________________________________ The...
If this had been a good year, he would have been eligible for the RRL when he was considered for separation [in 90] and his case would have been reviewed as a retirement-in-lieu-of- discharge case. The applicant’s military personnel records, to include documents pertaining to the administrative discharge board and the AF/DRB appeals, are provided at Exhibit B. JACKSON A. HAUSLEIN, JR. Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-03240 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the...
On 31 July 1996, HQ ARPC/SGS recommended the applicant be administratively discharged for medical disqualification, i.e., neurological condition with residual speech disturbance, and that he was not eligible for disability processing under the provisions of AFI 36-3212, Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement and AFMPC/DPMA Separations. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director, Health Services, HQ ARPC/SG, advises that major...
His oncologist has stated that, had a testicular exam been done in October 1993, the cancer would have been diagnosed then. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Physical Education Branch, HQ AFPC/DPAME, reviewed the case and states that for the period 1986-1994, while in Medical School on HPSP Scholarship and while completing his residency, the applicant was in an inactive, obligated Reserve status. A copy of the complete Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02259
DPP states that the applicant was voluntarily assigned to an inactive reserve section from 21 November 2001 until 11 September 2002, when he accepted the IMA position. DPP notes that the fact that the member was assigned to inactive status for a majority of his R/R year, plus the fact that he did not earn 35 points during the time he was in a participating assignment, resulted in him not being credited with a satisfactory year of service. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01060
DPA further states the applicant was briefed by recruiting on or about 20 December 2006 correctly regarding the scroll process which caused a break in service between her date of separation (DOS) and her appointment date into the Air Force Reserve. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states she understands that her start date in the Reserves cannot be changed...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02113
She notes that even the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) Fact Sheet on the IRR does not disclose information about a Reserve officers promotion status and led her to believe that she would not be discharged unless she requested resignation of her commission. The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. The applicant was discharged from the Regular Air Force with a separation pay benefit prior to completing her MSO.
At the completion of the course of treatment she was found fit for full duty and released from active duty back to the Air Force Reserve. No Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) was initiated at this time to determine her fitness for duty and AFRES started administrative discharge action under the provisions of AFI 36-3209. Also, in September 1996, ARPC/DPAD terminated discharge action and cleared her to return to active participating status with an assignment limitation code 7 96-0 1447 of...