ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-01210
INDEX CODE: 110.03, 131
APPLICANT COUNSEL: STEWART J. ALEXANDER
SSN HEARING DESIRED: Yes
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS:
Reinstatement to active duty and retroactive promotion to the grade of
lieutenant colonel.
_________________________________________________________________
RESUME OF CASE:
In an application, dated , the applicant requested reinstatement to
active duty and retroactive promotion to the grade of lieutenant
colonel. On , the Board considered and denied his requests (see
Exhibit I).
On , counsel for the applicant provided additional documentation and
requested reconsideration of applicant’s case (see Exhibit J).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. We have reviewed the
entire application and the additional documentation submitted.
However, we are unpersuaded that a revision of the earlier
determination in this case is warranted. In coming to this
conclusion, we again reviewed the rationale provided by the Air Force
and noted the prior statements provided by the applicant. However,
after reviewing all the documentation and supporting statements, in
our view, the applicant has failed to sustain his burden that he has
suffered either an error or an injustice. We note that on 30 Oct 97,
the applicant’s senior rater stated that the PRF he rendered on the
applicant was fair and just and that it capsulated his intent to have
the applicant promoted to the grade of lieutenant colonel. In view of
this statement and the senior rater’s prior statement of 31 Mar 93
wherein he stated that he felt confident that the applicant was
provided every opportunity to fairly compete in the promotion process,
in our estimation, the selection boards in question had sufficient
records pertaining to the applicant’s performance and promotion
potential in order to make reasonable determinations concerning his
promotability and we find no violation of any regulatory provisions
regarding promotion processing errors. Therefore, we again find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.
2. The documentation provided with this case was sufficient to give
the Board a clear understanding of the issues involved and a personal
appearance, with or without counsel, would not have materially added
to that understanding. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not
favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 12 July 1999, under the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Ms. Sophia A. Clark, Member
Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit I. ROP, dated 27 Mar 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit J. Letter fr counsel, dated 7 Apr 99, w/atchs.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-01210A
On 3 Mar 98, the Board considered and denied his requests (see Exhibit I). On 7 Apr 99, counsel for the applicant provided additional documentation and requested reconsideration of applicant’s case (see Exhibit J). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
On 3 Mar 98, the Board considered and denied his requests (see Exhibit I). On 7 Apr 99, counsel for the applicant provided additional documentation and requested reconsideration of applicant’s case (see Exhibit J). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9701857A1
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-01857 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for consideration by the CY97C Lieutenant Colonel Board, which convened on 21 Jul 97, be replaced with a reaccomplished PRF. ...
In support of his request, applicant submits a personal statement, copies of his PRF for the P0696B Board, a Performance Feedback Worksheet (PFW), a statement from his rater, his Field Grade Officer Performance Report (OPR), closing 29 February 1996, and additional documents associated with the issues cited in his contentions (Exhibit A). If the Board finds that the documentation was unjust and corrective action is appropriate, then for the reasons indicated above, DPAIP2 recommended one of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01151
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS INDEX CODE 111.01 111.03 111.05 131.01 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-01151 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period closing 24 Oct 98 be declared void, the Performance Recommendation Form (PRF) for the Calendar Year 1999A (CY99A) Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board be...
In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a revised PRF as well as a copy of a letter sent to his Management Level Review president by his Senior Rater requesting that the revised PRF be substituted for the original PRF and the applicant meet an SSB. ____________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the Promotion Recommendation...
He had less than two years eligibility to complete ACSC prior to consideration for LTC IPZ in Apr 99, whereas his peers had at least four and one-half years. He did complete ACSC in Nov 99 in time for the CY99B board’s consideration. Although the applicant did not raise this issue, we believe his not having sufficient time to build a performance record as a major before being considered IPZ for LTC may have contributed to his nonselection.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02860
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02860 INDEX CODE 131.01 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be given Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration by the Calendar Year 2000A (CY00A) and CY01B Central Colonel Selection Boards and the 2000 and 2001 Senior Service School (SSS) selection boards. The presence of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02755
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02755 INDEX CODES: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be immediately promoted to the Reserve grade of colonel, with a retroactive date of 2006; or, in the alternative, his record be considered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion to the grade of colonel by the Fiscal...
Furthermore, we recommend his corrected record be considered for promotion by an SSB for the CY00A board. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF), AF Form 709, prepared for the Calendar Year 2000A Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, be declared void and removed from his records...