RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-03397
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His record, to include an Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the
period 30 April 1991 through 1 May 1992, be considered for promotion to the
Reserve grade of major by a Special Review Board (SRB) for the Fiscal Year
1998 (FY98) Major Selection Board.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was denied fair and equitable promotion consideration due to a perceived
break in service for the period 30 April 1991 through 3 February 1994.
The applicant states from 1 May 1990 through 15 May 1992, Captain Blome was
his rating official. The last annual Officer Performance Report (OPR) in
his record while on active duty, covered the period 1 May 1990 through 20
April 1991. However, there is no OPR covering the period 1 May 1991
through 15 May 1992. During this period, he continued to fly as an AC-130
pilot. No OPR was rendered for this period because a representative from
the Consolidated Base Personnel Office (CBPO) advised the unit that an OPR
was not required since he was leaving active duty. However, this was
incorrect. From 15 May 1992 through 3 February 1994, he was assigned to
the inactive ready reserve and applied to all reserve and Air National
Guard units in the Southeastern United States in order to obtain an active
reserve or guard position. He obtained a position on 3 February 1994. He
was not aware of the problem until after his nonselection for promotion to
the Reserve grade of major.
In support of the appeal, applicant submits copies of his OPRs, a copy of
his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from the Armed Forces
of the United States, and a statement from his commander.
The applicant’s commander states that he strongly endorses his request for
an appeal of his nonselection to the grade of major. The commander also
states that applicant has been a superior Squadron Leader during his tenure
and is a dependable volunteer with a stellar history of flying in Bosnia,
Southwest Asia, and the Pacific. The commander believes that a break in
service should not be held against a member with a distinguished career
which includes many trips into harms way as a C-130 Special Operations
Pilot and Tactical Operations C-130 Pilot.
The applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Air Force Reserve in the grade of
major.
On 18 November 1983, the applicant was commissioned a second lieutenant and
entered extended active duty.
On 15 May 1992, the applicant was released from active duty in the grade of
captain under the provisions of AFR 36-12 (Voluntary Resignation:
Completion of Active Duty Service Commitment). However, the DD Form 214,
does not reflect the command to which he was transferred.
On 16 May 1992, the applicant was commissioned in the Reserve grade of
captain in the Air Force Reserve.
The applicant was considered and not selected for promotion to the Reserve
grade of major by the FY98 Major Selection Board which convened on 3 March
1997.
The applicant was considered and selected for promotion to the Reserve
grade of major by the FY99 Major Selection Board. He was was promoted to
that grade, effective and with date of rank (DOR) of 1 October 1998.
A resume of applicant’s Officer Performance Reports (OPRs), since 30 April
1989, follows:
PERIOD ENDING OVERALL EVALUATION
8 Jan 86 Meets Standards (MS)
30 Apr 90 MS (w/LOE)
30 Apr 91 MS
No report rendered for the period 1 May 91 through 3 Feb 94
3 Feb 95 MS
3 Feb 96 MS
* 2 Dec 96 MS
* Top report reviewed by the FY98 board.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Personnel Program Management,
ARPC/DPJC, reviewed this application and states that applicant is incorrect
that in accordance with AFR 36-10, dated 1 August 1988, table 3-6, rule 1,
note 3, an OPR should have been rendered with a close-out date of 20 April
1992. They note that AFR 36-10(change 1), dated 1 February 1990, table 3-
1, rule 4, note 4, applies to this case. The applicant would not have been
due an annual report because upon voluntary separation, the close-out date
is established as 30 days prior to the departure date. The applicant
separated from active Air Force on 15 May 1992. Even if his date of
separation was the same as his departure date, the close-out date of the
OPR would be established as 15 April 1992 making it a Change in Reporting
Official (CRO) report. In accordance with note 4, no report is required
when separation is by voluntary resignation. They note that prior to the
promotion board, the applicant was given the opportunity to write a letter
to the board explaining why a gap is in his record. In addition, the
applicant met the FY98, not the FY97 major board. Therefore, they
recommend denial of his request.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states there was no
voluntary separation. He resigned his regular commission on 15 May 1992
and accepted a Reserve commission on 16 May 1992 with no break in service.
He did not write a letter to the board because he had no knowledge of a
perceived break in service until he was nonselected. He requests that his
corrected record be considered for promotion by an SRB for the FY98 board.
In further support of the appeal, applicant submits a statement from the
Chief, Career Enhancement indicating the applicant was not voluntarily
separated but resigned his Regular commission and accepted a Reserve
commission with no break in service.
The applicant’s complete response is attached at Exhibit E.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice to warrant the applicant’s
promotion to the Reserve grade of major by the FY98 Board. While we
recognize that an OPR may not have been required to have been rendered, in
view of the lengthy period from his last performance report in 1991 to his
actual date of separation in 1992, we believe it would have been
appropriate for a report to have been rendered. In addition, in view of
the lapse of time, it appears that it would be impossible for the applicant
to have a report submitted by the rating officials. We also note the
applicant experienced difficulty in obtaining a Reserve position which made
the gap between his last active duty performance report and his first
Reserve performance report even longer. In view of the unique
circumstances present in this case and since he was promoted to the Reserve
grade of major by the next regularly scheduled selection board, we
recommend his effective date and promotion service date be changed to 12
August 1997, the date he would have received had he been promoted by the
FY98 selection board. Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected to
the extent indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was promoted to the Reserve
grade of major, with an effective date and promotion service date of 12
August 1997.
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 10 November 1998, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
Mr. Joseph G. Diamond. , Member
Mr. Terry A. Yonkers, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Nov 97, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPJC, dated 15 Dec 97.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 5 Jan 97.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 25 Jan 98, w/atch.
Exhibit F. Letter, ARPC/DPJC, dated 15 Apr 98.
Exhibit G. Letter, ARPC/DPJ, dated 22 Apr 98.
Exhibit H. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 15 Jun 98.
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 97-03397
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was promoted to the
grade of major, with an effective date and promotion service date of 12
August 1997.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PEB 1 8 ?999 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET "IBER: 97-03397 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO LICANT REOUESTS THAT: His record, to include an Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 30.April 1991 through 1 May 1992, be considered for promotion to the Reserve grade of major by a Special Review Board (SRB) for the Fiscal Year 1998 (FY98) Major Selection Board. On 16 May 1992, the applicant was commissioned in...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01823 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the Reserve grade of major by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Fiscal Year 1998 (FY98) Air Force Reserve Major Position Vacancy (PV) Selection Board. The Air Force states that the AFCM was not...
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. The Staff Judge Advocate, HQ AFPC/JA, reviewed the application and believes that the relief sought by the applicant (with the exception of his request that his 1984 OER be removed) should be granted and the actions recommended by HQ ARPC/DA be taken in this case. The applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR 95-01 971 , dated 21 July 1995) requesting he be...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DPJA, reviewed this application and states that at the present time, under the ROPMA, they do not have the authority to hold SSBs for PV promotions. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, to include the Field...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03256
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DPJA, reviewed this application and states that at the present time, under the ROPMA, they do not have the authority to hold SSBs for PV promotions. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, to include the Field...
He be reassigned to Extended Active Duty (EAD) as a statutory tour officer to complete 2 years, and 3 months of active duty for completion of 20 years for retirement. The applicant notes that the policy at the time he was renewed for a second tour was that a statutory officer would be continued for a 20-year retirement if they had excellent performance and 12 to 14 years of active duty. However, should the Board elect to provide the applicant relief, they recommend the applicant’s record...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-00242
He be reassigned to Extended Active Duty (EAD) as a statutory tour officer to complete 2 years, and 3 months of active duty for completion of 20 years for retirement. The applicant notes that the policy at the time he was renewed for a second tour was that a statutory officer would be continued for a 20-year retirement if they had excellent performance and 12 to 14 years of active duty. However, should the Board elect to provide the applicant relief, they recommend the applicant’s record...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DPJA, reviewed this application and states that at the present time, under the ROPMA, they do not have the authority to hold SSBs for PV promotions. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, to include that the...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02712
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DPJA, reviewed this application and states that at the present time, under the ROPMA, they do not have the authority to hold SSBs for PV promotions. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, to include that the...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03145
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that an injustice exists; the request to fix the law is in process, according to ARPC. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT,...