AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
s
DOCKET NO: 98-02157
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: NO
fE8 2 5 1999
Applicant requests his 1986 general discharge be upgraded to
honorable. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant I s
request on 17 July 1998 (Exhibit C). In accordance with policy,
the application was forwarded to this Board f o r further
consideration. The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for
review and response (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has
been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the AFDRB Brief appear to be based on the
evidence of record. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was
denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not
followed, o r appropriate standards were not applied, we find no
basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Appl'icant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Ms. Martha Maust, Mr. Frederick A. Beaman
111, and Ms. Patricia D. Vestal considered this application on
15 December 1998 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 3 6 - 2 6 0 3 , and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
@4fA
ne1 Chair
Exhibits :
A . Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. AFDRB Brief
D. AFBCMR Letter Forwarding AFDRB Brief
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant I s request on 17 July 1998 (Exhibit C). The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Available Master Personnel Records C. AFDRB Brief D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding AFDRB Brief D E P A R T M E N T OF THE A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR F O R C E B A S E T E X A S JUL 0 6 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS 550 C Street West Ste 11 Randolph AFB TX 78 150-47 13 SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant s request on 29 July 1998. (Atch 1-3) Copies of the documents to .be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant s request on 29 July 1998. (Atch 1-3) Copies of the documents to .be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.
In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. (Atch 1-3) Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached. Instead of the appointed counsel, you may have another, if the lawyer you request is in the active military service and is reasonably available as determined according to AFI 5 1-201.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant s request on 2 6 October 1998. In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C ) . The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant's request for upgrade of his discharge and changed of reason for discharge (Exhibit C). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request for change of his RE Code and provided an advisory opinion to the Board (Exhibit D). The decision of the AFDRB appears to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant's request for upgrade of his discharge and changed of reason for discharge (Exhibit C). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request for change of his RE Code and provided an advisory opinion to the Board (Exhibit D). The decision of the AFDRB appears to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The 'decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Counsel s response to the AFDRB Brief is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.