DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
2 4 JUL 1998
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR 97-02785
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A
Stat 116), it is directed that:
application was partially approved by competent authority in the amount of $78 1.25.
rds of the Department of the Air Force relating t
corrected to show that on 30 June 1994, he appl
urred as a result of excess weight of household goods and his
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
6
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 97-02785
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO 24 JUL 1998
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The remaining balance of $1,308.74 debt, resulting from an
overweight shipment of his household goods (HHG) at the time of
his retirement, be deleted. The total debt was $1562.49.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The movers underestimated the weight of his household goods and
he did not receive his 50 pounds of unaccompanied baggage for
professional books and papers. Applicant states that it took
three years to notify him of the debt and, since retirement, he
is not financially able to pay.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force Office of
Primary Responsibility (OPR) . Accordingly, there is no need to
recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Claims Branch, Directorate of Debt and Claims
Management, DFAS-DE/FYCC, states that since they are unable to
take action to administratively provide the relief sought, they
contacted the Waivers and Remission Branch (DFAS-DE/FYCT) for
their recommendation. They were informed that had they received
the applicant's remission request prior to his separation, they
would have recommended remission of $781.25 and denial of $781.24
based on guidelines set forth by the Office of the Secretary of
the Air Force. Based on the evidence, they find there has been
an error or injustice. They recommend the applicant's records be
corrected to show that the application for remission was received
and processed prior to the applicant's separation and partial
remission was granted.
A copy of the DFAS-DE/FYCC evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 19 January 1998 for review and response within 30 days. As of
this date, no response has been received by this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice
warranting partial relief. It appears that had applicant been
aware of the excess weight prior to his separation, he could have
submitted a request for remission. DFAS states that had the
application been received prior to his retirement, the
recommendation would have been for remission of $781.25 of the
debt. In view of the length of time it took the Air Force to
notify the applicant of this debt and in an effort to remove any
possibility of an injustice to the applicant, we agree with the
DFAS recommendation. Applicant's request for full remission of
his debt is not favorably considered in view of the fact that
only partial remission would have been approved had his request
been submitted prior to his retirement. Therefore, we recommend
his records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 30 June 1994,
he applied for a remission of indebtedness incurred as a result
of excess weight of his household goods and his application
received partial remission in the amount of $781.25 by competent
authority.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 11 June 1998, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
2
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Panel Chair
Mr. Robert W. Zook, Member
Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Sep 97, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, DFAS-DE/FYCC, dated 30 Dec 9 7 .
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 19 Jan 98.
c
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Panel Chair
3
--
DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE
DENVER CENTER
6760 E. IRVINGTON PLACE
DENVER, COLORADO 80279
DFAS-DE/FYCC
MEMORANDUM FOR AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
ATTN: AFBCMR
SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Records
We examined the attached application for correction of
count Number
ction to
we are forwarding it
for your consideration.
The applicant is requesting his military records be
corrected to show his application for remission of a $1,562.49
household goods debt was received and processed prior to his
separation on July 1, 1994. The applicant is asking for
remission consideration for excess weight shipping costs incurred
as a result of exceeding the authorized weight allowance. The
applicant has filed a timely request.
We contacted the Waivers and Remission Branch (DFAS-DE/FYCT)
They informed us that had they
for their recommendation.
received the applicant's remission request prior to his
separation, they would have recommended remission of $781.25 and
denial of $781.24 based on guidelines set forth by the Office of
the Secretary of the Air Force. Based on the evidence before us,
we find there has been an error or injustice.
applicant's records be corrected to show that the application for
remission was received and processed prior to the applicant's
separation and remission of $781.25 was granted and $781.24 was
denied.
We recommend the
t
. I I
Our address is DFAS-DE/FYCC, 6760 East Irvington Place,
Denver, Colorado 80279-7100. Our point of contact is Delynn
Orlosky and she may be reached at DSN 926-4793, or commercial
(303) 676-4793.
Diana E. Settelmeyer
Chief, Claims Branch
Directorate of Debt and Claims
Management
&&e Director v Air Force Review Boards Agency I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS NOv2 3 7998 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 9 7 - 0 3 3 2 1 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive a waiver of her government property lost or damaged (GPLD) indebtedness of $ 2 8 6 . While we note that applicant's request for a waiver of indebtedness does not constitute an erroneous payment of pay and allowances, we believe a remission...
Many evacuees who took an advance later received a waiver of one month's basic pay and did not have to repay the advance. DFAS-DE/FYCC EVALUATION: The Chief , Claims Branch, DFAS-DE/FYCC, evaluated this and confirms that the applicant was stationed at rom 10' November 1989 through 9 June 1991. was advanced $ 1991 while he was stationed a A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01 024 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: E cords of the Department of the Air Force relatin , be corrected to show that on 9...
(Exhibit C) The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D) . Available Master Personnel Records C. ROP AFBCMR 95- 02984, dtd 11 Feb 97; Memorandum for the Chief of Staff, dtd 7 Oct 97 D. Advisory Opinion E. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE DENVER CENTER 6760 E, IRVINGTON PLACE DENVER, COLORADO 80279 DFAS-DE/FYCC MAR 1 9 1998 SUBJECT:...
_________________________________________________________________ DFAS EVALUATION: The Chief, Claims Branch, DFAS-DE/FYCC, reviewed the application and states that they contacted the Waivers and Remission Branch (DFAS- DE/FYCT) for their recommendation and were informed that had the applicant’s remission application been received prior to his separation, they would have recommended remission of $316.65 and denial of $320.00 based on guidelines set forth by the Office of the Secretary of the...
_________________________________________________________________ DFAS-DE EVALUATION: The Chief, Claims Branch, DFAS-DE/FYCC, reviewed the application and states that they contacted the Waivers and Remission Branch (DFAS- DE/FYCT) for their recommendation and were informed that, had they received the applicant’s remission application prior to his separation on 9 August 1996, they would have recommended remission of $528.75 and denial of $753.04 based on guidelines set forth by the Office of...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant states finance did not inform him of the method used to compute payment of accrued leave. The applicant separated from the.Air Force on May 15, 1997, and reentered active duty in the May 17, 1997.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions LeROY T. BASEMAN Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS DEC 0 4 I997 U.S. AIR FORCE B 1 9 4 7 - 1 9 9 7 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPC/DPPRS 550 C Street West...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Applicant is stating t h a t he s o l d 20 days of leave back to the United States Air Force upon separation August 16, 1997, but was never paid for the leave nor...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action, The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant. IRVINGTON...