Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800350
Original file (9800350.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

DOCKET NUMBER:  98-00350 

COXNSEL:  None 

HEARING DESIRED: NG 

Applicant  requests  his  reenlistment  eligibility  (RE)  code  be 
changed  from  "2B" to  f f 2 ' r  to  allow  him  to  enlist  in  the  Army. 
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. 

The  facts  surrounding  his  separation  from  the  Air  Force  are 
contained in his military  records which are  attached at  Exhibit 
B. 

After  careful  consideration  of  applicant's  request  and  the 
available  evidence  of  record, w e   find  insufficient-  evidence  of 
error or  injustice to warrant  corrective action.  The  facts and 
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the 
evidence  of  record  and  have  not  been  rebutted  by  applicant. 
Absent  persuasive  evidence applicant was  denied rights to which 
entitled,  appropriate  regulations  were  not  followed,  or 
appropriate  standards  were  not  applied,  we  find  no  basis  to 
disturb the existing record. 

Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. 

The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision. 
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and 
will  only be  reconsidered upon  t h e   presentation of  new relevant 
evidence  which  was  not  reasonably  available  at  the  time  the 
application was filed. 

Members of the Board Ms. Patricia J .  Zarodkiewicz, Mr. Jackson A. 
Hauslein, and Ms. Dorothy P. Loeb,  considered this application on 
25  June  1998 
in  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Air  Force 
Instruction 36 
2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552. 

PATR I C I A J 
Panel Chai 

Exhibits : 
A.  Applicant's DD Form  149 
B.  Available Master Personnel Records 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800025

    Original file (9800025.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the The advisory opinions were application be denied (Exhibit C ) . forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0001046

    Original file (0001046.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated the request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit G). The applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit I.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801380

    Original file (9801380.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    -...I The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). c. On 14 Jul98, the applicant was again requested to provide a copy of the recommendation package, with a copy of the DECOR-6, and informing him it was the applicant’s responsibility to h i s h all documentation to substantiate his claim.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0000840

    Original file (0000840.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9702759

    Original file (9702759.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Requested Action. Applicant appeared before a Board of Officers without counsel convened to review the pertinent facts and circumstances and make recommendation to the discharge authority if he should be discharged fiom the service.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9601825

    Original file (9601825.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE MATTER OF: AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: 96-0182 pt"u'2 5 1398 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING: NO The applicant requests that he receive a regular retirement under the 15 year Reserve Transition Assistance Program (RTAP) program and that he be retired in the grade of master sergeant ( E - 7 ) which was the highest grade held. The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinions to the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9800378

    Original file (9800378.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. be of an The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit 'D) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). After careful consideration of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703673

    Original file (9703673.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Applicant is stating t h a t he s o l d 20 days of leave back to the United States Air Force upon separation August 16, 1997, but was never paid for the leave nor...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101565

    Original file (0101565.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not available at the time the application was filed.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801199

    Original file (9801199.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01199 COUNSEL: NONE The applicant requests that his separation from the Air Force be changed from "Entry Level Separation" to "Honorable. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his...