Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9702689
Original file (9702689.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

DOCKET NUMBER:  97-02689 JUL 2 4 1998 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  YES 

Applicant  requests  that  the  original  decision  of  his  court- 
martial be reevaluated.  Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A .  
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative 
report which is attached at Exhibit C. 

The  appropriate Air  Force  office  evaluated applicant's request 
and provided  an advisory opinion to  the Board  recommending the 
application be  denied  (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to  the 
advisory opinion is at Exhibit F. 

After  careful  consideration  of  applicant's  request  and  the 
available evidence of  record, we  find  insufficient  evidence  of 
error or injustice to warrant corrective action.  The facts and 
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the 
evidence  of  record  and  have  not  been  adequately  rebutted  by 
applicant. 
Absent  persuasive  evidence  applicant  was  denied 
rights  to  which  entitled,  appropriate  regulations  were  not 
followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no 
basis to disturb the existing record. 

Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. 

The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been 
shown  that  a  personal  appearance with  or without  counsel will 
materially  add  to  our  understanding  of  the  issues  involved. 
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. 

The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision. 
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and 
will  only be  reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant 
evidence  which  was  not  reasonably  available  at  the  time  the 
application was filed. 

Members  Of  the  Board  Ms.  Charlene  M.  Bradley,  Dr.  Gerald  B .  
Kauvar, and Ms. Patricia D. Vestal considered this application on 
30  Jun  98  in  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Air  Force 

Instruction 36-2603 and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C.  1552. u 

CHARLENE M. an.* BRADLEY 

Panel Chair 

c/ 

Exhibits : 
A.  Applicant's DD Form 149 
B.  Available Master Personnel Records 
C.  FBI Report 
D.  Advisory Opinion 
E. 
F.  Applicant's Response 

SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0100022

    Original file (0100022.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, while serving in the grade of airman, was discharged from the Air Force on 13 May 1981 under the provisions of AFM 39-12 (Misocnduct- Drug Abuse - Board), with an undesirable discharge. In this case, the applicant provided no facts warranting an upgrade of the discharge he received. Therefore, we agree with opinions and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9901215A

    Original file (9901215A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01215 INDEX CODE: 106.00 COUNSEL: Todd A. McConaghy HEARING DESIRED: Yes RESUME OF CASE: In an application dated 3 June 1999, applicant requested that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 17 August 1999, the Board considered and denied applicant’s request. We conclude, therefore, that the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02038

    Original file (BC-2007-02038.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02038 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. A copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the applicant on 17 October 2007 for review and response within 30 days (See Exhibit D). We considered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00779

    Original file (BC-2008-00779.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00779 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general. On 17 Apr 08, a request for post-service information was forwarded to the applicant for response within 30 days (Exhibit D). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02627

    Original file (BC-2003-02627.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, as of this date, this office has received no response. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence of error or injustice. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00692

    Original file (BC-2007-00692.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served four years on active duty with 106 days lost time. We also considered upgrading his discharge based on clemency; however, noting his apparent misconduct following his discharge as indicated on the FBI report, we do not believe a recommendation that the characterization of his discharge be upgraded on that basis is warranted. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Available Master Personnel Records.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01005

    Original file (BC-2008-01005.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01005 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900220A

    Original file (9900220A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s request is at Exhibit A. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit E. Letter,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01792

    Original file (BC-2004-01792.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01792 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 5 DECEMBER 2006 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded. In his undated response to our request for post-service information, the applicant provided a personal statement and a Metro Lift application (Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900738

    Original file (9900738.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 August 1985, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied an application submitted by applicant requesting upgrade of his discharge (see AFDRB Hearing Record at Exhibit C). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit F). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit H. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the...