*
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 96-03095
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. His honorable military retirement be changed to a medical
retirement at 100% disability.
2. He receive competent civilian psychiatric care and
transsexual evaluations and that all costs of counseling and care
be provided by the Federal government.
3. The Federal government cover the cost of moving to an
apartment or housing rental in an area more easily amenable to
transvestites.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The Air Force is both liable and responsible for the problems
#related and brought on in refusing to accept responsibility for
his medical treatment. The Air Force has never offered, or
attempted in any manner to treat him for the problems and it
can't be claimed it was not recognized or known that treatment
was needed. Applicant alleges that it can't be considered as
normal to know or be aware that an individual is a transvestite
dressing in women's clothes to be allowed to function as he was
permitted and it must be assumed that known behavior was accepted
thereof. Applicant wishes a change in the status from his
honorable retirement to a medical retirement at 100% benefits
effective from June 30, 1995. Applicant also alleges that his
medical records were changed in the sense of rewritten and re-
dated.
In support of his request, applicant submits a document (hand-
written) which he filed with the U. s. District Court of
California on 19 September 1996. He also submits portions of
medical records and documentation from his military personnel
record.
Applicant's submission is attached at Exhibit A.
the recommendation of the USAF Hospital-
The recommendation was based
AFB,
received from
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on 25 August 1989
for a period of six (6) years in the grade of staff sergeant
(E-5).
Available documentation reflects that on 22 April 1985 tAF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00877
The unfavorable personnel action (reassigning her to Bolling AFB for mental fitness, indefinite suspension of her security clearance, and removal from her Department of Defense (DOD) position) taken by the military used mental health evaluations after she made a protected disclosure. DTIC so advised the applicant on 4 Jan 01, and proposed to suspend her indefinitely from active duty and pay status from her position as a GS-12 Technical Information Specialist, pending the final disposition...
NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00028
PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 000216 with an uncharacterized service for defective enlistment and induction due to erroneous enlistment (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issue 1 states: “My discharge is wrong because I've lied to the Navy that I was a transvestite and...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01074
She was given several “rule out” diagnoses (delusional disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, and paranoid personality disorder/traits) at the start of her treatment.The CI was followed by an outpatient psychiatrist whodocumented “hx of paranoid personality”on a progress note dated 07 May 2002.The CI was hospitalized following this visit which recommended that the CI be evaluated by a psychologist and considered for “repeat MEB.”(It was noted that the provider’s progress notes that...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 96-00521 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: Yes K T 2 8 19k!f-- APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated to active duty and given the proper medical treatment he was denied; He be given an honorable discharge with full retirement. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant states that evidence of record and medical examinations prior to separation indicate the applicant did not have...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01265
Upon completion of residential treatment, he was transferred to aftercare treatment. His case was to be referred to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). According to emails in the applicant’s records, he was recommended for discharge on 8 Jul 03 for mental disorders under AFI 36-3208, para.
He elected retired pay based on the ten percent disability rating; thus, his former spouse received no disposable retired pay. After reviewing all of the evidence, the Formal PEB found the applicant physically unfit for military service and recommended temporary retirement with a compensable rating of 80 percent for the diagnoses of: (1) Primary degenerative dementia with severe impairment of social and industrial adaptability; (2) Reactive airway disease exacerbated by chronic sinusitis;...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0051
However the Board found it inappropriate to characterize the applicant's Reason for discharge as a Personality Disorder, when in fact, his diagnosis is Adjustment Disorder. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMKNT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former 2LT) (HGH 2LT) 1. He was assigned t6 Nellis AFB, NV on or about 12 Oct 99.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010163
Additionally, on 23 August 2001, the applicant's immediate commander notified him that she was initiating action to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 14-12(c), for misconduct commission of a serious offense. The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge which disqualify the Soldier from further military service. The applicant failed to...
He be reinstated on active duty in an AGR-Title 32 position as a Security Police Officer. Counsel’s complete responses, with attachments, are attached at Exhibits F and G , P ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, reviewed t h i s application and states that based on the Board‘s request for further review, professional mental health provider input was sought regarding applicant’s allegations of impropriety in the administration and evaluation of his case. A...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010535
He requests an upgrade of his discharge and characterization of service in order to be eligible for VA benefits. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged from the Army in the rank of major on 16 November 2010, under the provisions of Army Regulation 600-8-24, paragraph 4-2b. If a physical or mental condition develops after an officer has been recommended for involuntary separation or after the Board of Inquiry proceedings are completed, the officer's commander will immediately notify the...