NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9151 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2014. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 1 August 2014, and the advisory opinion from HOQMC dated 8 September 2014, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9152 14
You requested completely removing the fitness report for 5 April to 30 November 2007, and you impliedly requested removing your failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 20615 Major Selection Board. In this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the advisory opinion in finding your selection by the FY 2015 promotion board would have been definitely unlikely, even if your record had reflected the modifications CMC has directed to the fitness report at issue. Consequently, when:...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9154 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9157 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9159 14
The Board and 18 December 2014 with also considered your y 2015 with enclosu enclosures, 9 Januar Information act reply dated 6 October 20 the command investigation dated 1 August with enclosures - applicatio injustice were regulations 4m 2014, copies ° 4 with redacted copy of 2013) and 6 March 2015 sideration of the entire itted was bable material ious con he ‘evidence subm tablish the existence of pro In this connection, the Board substantially omments contained in the reports of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9160 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9162 14
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative C a “ a i regulations ana procedures appilt e Board. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9163 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2014. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 1 August 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9165 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2014, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9166 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of: Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decigion in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden ison the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9167 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9173 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to add the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) to her enlistment guarantees. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective aceLon:. c. A...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9178 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JEA Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a Zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . NR9178-14 RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9182 14
NR9182-14 4 May 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C, 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) CNRC memo 1133 Ser N323 of 26 Feb 15 (3) Subject’s naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to add the Loan Repayment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9184 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to back date an advancement. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. The minimum required FMS for advancement was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9209 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 dated 30 January 2015, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR9209-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9211 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR9211-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9227 14
Your current request has been considered by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 15 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that your statement that your discharge should be recharacterized pursuant to Presidential Proclamation (PP 4313),...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9253 14
NR9253-14 21, Apr 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To% Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD _ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting o a a ip reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 April 2015...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9255 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9281 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No:NRO9281-14 19 November 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: {a} Title.10 U.S.c. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Headquarters Marine Corps letter 5400 RCT of 23 Oct 2014 i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9282 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JEA Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of ay a iii reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9321 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to remove the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) from her enlistment guarantees. Option (2) of Annex A to the DD Form 4 reflects “N/A”, vice “Loan Re-payment Program”.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9326 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS HOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 ago Q mn — “4 7 x) ' iS From Board for Correction of Records To of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref (a} Title 10 U.S.C; 1552 D OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C/15U0187 dtd 6 Feb S j Ss t iL naval record be ze reimbursement for rental car expenses. ' A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner's naval record. It is certified that quorum was present at the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9345 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket C I -14 26 Mar E From Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO = o at ct » a aD 3 O 5 ct ya Encl: (1) DD Form 149 (2) NPC memo 14 ) Subject’s naval record a) 1. NR9345-14 RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner was administered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR935 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ROARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 et - c + + } ; ication ; r J doin: y mal -member i] ; Tat ob en as tae aRnee you were counse.ce treatment, and war ; echar ed admini nonjudic¢ consumm t 1ONn¢ rab Ollol asi roncirre COilo bs ite what. vou be discl J weil “ x recommendat On 16 August 1989, the discharge authority directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct. You were so discharged on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9351 14
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “I anticipate SNM [Subject Named Marine] will be removed from BCP [Body Composition Program] and be an asset to my command.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9352 14
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 5 August 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9353 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9357 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your — application on 15 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9359 14
SAARTD FOR CORRECTION OF WAS F CcCOPRTS 7 > pin PMU >e OAs SULT 1 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 490 14 al Re This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. BR three-member panel of rhe Board for Correc Records, sitting in executive session, consi application on 19 November 2014. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board Found that the evidence submitted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9364 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR937 14
SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 reasor have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). Your case was forwarded and the separation authority directed that you receive an OTH discharge by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9372 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 3972-14 28 April 2015 Dear Sam: . This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2015.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9375 14
This is an important feature of the law because the transferability provisions are intended as an incentive vice a benefit. Members who are retired are not eligible to transfer the benefits. NR9375-14 daughter's cane the application but is appears that her name was dropped.” e Board concurs with the advisory opinion that a review of your record shows that you initially designated 18 months to your son, but later went back and modified it to 16 months.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9378 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 30 March 2005. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9383 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 JET Docket No. NR93383-14 22 Dec 14 From: Cnairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9384 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner’s Home of Record (HOR) on her DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States), was changed to reflect Burlington,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9388 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JEA Docket No. NR9388-14 21 Apr 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TOs Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO ReE: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR939 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo dated 23 June 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9393 14_Redacted
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You did not respond in a timely manner and were honorably discharged from the TDRL program, and assigned an RE-3P (physical disability) reentry code. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reentry code given the fact you were offered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9395 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. s After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9397 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 22 September 2010. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9404 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL REGURUS 70) & COURTHGUSE ROAD. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 August 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9416 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2014, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9419 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9421 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in t support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board {(PERB), dated 8 August...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9423 14
| A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9424 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9425 14
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 8 August 2014, and the advisory opinion from HQMC dated 19 May 2014, copies of which are attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...