NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR945 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 7 w V TY) ro Lu du Fant L wel {W STM * The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to change your RE-3M reenlistment code. Accordingly, your application nas peen aenied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9450 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. NR9450-14 27 Apr 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: an OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9451 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2014. New evidence ig evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9462 14
SUITE 100° ARLINGTON. NRg9452-14 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR948 14
Pursuant to the p-ovisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner de/slined participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). .The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’ allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9481 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Special Duty Assignment Pay (SDAP) . A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9482 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Special Duty Assignment Pay (SDAP) . The Board, consisting iD ia and reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9483 14_Redacted
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the other than honorable (OTH) characterization of his discharge of 18 February 1972, be changed to general under honorable conditions. reviewed Petiti S allegations of error and Justice on 4 February 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9484 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. NR9484-14 4 May 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 UvS.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR949 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docker Na WNRONG49-14 naval record, the “an is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR951 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on ll February 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgrade your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9529 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9579 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. At that time you were assigned an RE-3P reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR958 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2015. Batter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9612 14_Redacted
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 9612-14 N15 16 Janis S4Ssnacc = ae reo This is in reference to your reconsideration request dated 21 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9613 14
2. the Board, consisting of Messrs. Ii reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1S February 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In enclosure (2), the Commander, Navy Operational Support Center Columbus has recommended removing the contested entry. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9615 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JEA Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a Zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). NR9615-14 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9618 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S$. Pursuant to the provisions of r =re > (a) Subjex titioner, Enlisted Supe rSe 68-14 ere nat ey paps pte a's wy ped 1; roxrrer re 4 COSLIECtCLIve acti Cll raAeanrte = reo 1 radence OL rec f paragon ee ase Hh nal Cons. NR9618-14 RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to i. show tha m ct a.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR962 14
Regarding your assertion, the Board noted there is no evidence in your record, and you submitted none, to support your assertion. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9622 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2015. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were insufficient to warrant relief in your case because Navy regulations state, in part, that Sailors serving in paygrade E-3 who have been diagnosed with a medical and/or mental condition, such as a personality disorder, and who have served for less than 180 days of active duty, must receive an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9624 14
NR9624-14 4 May 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tos Secretary of the Navy Sub]: a a a RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C, 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) CNRC memo 1133 Ser N323 of 5 Feb 15 (3) Subject’s naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to remove the Loan Repayment Program...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9645 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on il September 2014. Your counsel, citing DOD Instruction 1320.04, dated 3 January 2014, relied on Enclosure 4, paragraph 1.a(1)(b)2, which referred to information that “Did not result in more than a non-punitive rehabilitative counseling administered by a superior to a subordinate.” He contended that this language, which does not appear in DOD Instruction 1320.4,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9649 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NR09649-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9659 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 5420 Ser N130C1/14U1140 dated 27 August 2014, a Copy of which is attached. NES for a correction of an otficial Consegquentiy, when applying naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9677 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former commissioned officer of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his honorable discharge date of 31 January 2011, be changed to reflect 1 February 2011 and that his separation code “FBR” (expiration of term of service) be changed to “FGP” (interdepartmental transfer). The Board, consisting of Mr. Grover, Mr. Ivins, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9678 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner advanced to E-6/AWOl from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Ms. Countryman, Mr. Bey, and Mr. Koman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on , 19 November 2014 and, pursuant to its reguiations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9683 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE WAVY BOARD FOR GORREGTION OF NAVAL RECORDS & GFOURTHUUSE ROAL, SUITE 1007 yrs ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. The Board, consisting of Mr. ‘ reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. dependents transferred from pDG 77 O'Kane, Pearl Harbor, HI on 6 Petitioner .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9684 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9699 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NPS69S-14 rection of an official naval Consequently, when applying for a cor demonstrate the existence of record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9701 14
A-three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2014. Based on your Certificate of Release of Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214), administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. Further, the information you provided with your application, and the unavailability of your officiai military record, the Board employed a presumption of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9721 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SIN Docket No: 9721-14 17 October 2014 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a} 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a _ former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a changes to the reason for her discharge, separation authority “MILPERSMSN 3620200”, “LGH” separation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9739 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement of Temporary Duty (TDY) allowances in excess of 180 days. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR975 14
Nevertheless, the Boara concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reentry code. In this regard, an RE-4B reentry code is required when a Sailor is separated at the completion of required service and is not recommended tor reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9757 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704.5, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1007 ARLINGTON VA 92204-2490 a Pulte BAN Docket No.NRO9757-14 14 October 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she is entitled to a Special Selection Board for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9775 14
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has airected the requested change to the entry in section A, item 8.h of the report for 26 April to 30 June 2013. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9776 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2014. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 20 August 2014, a copy of which is attached, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9777 14
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, che burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9778 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9780 14
RTMENT OF THE nayy JSR Docket No: on min, wv Cctobey NRS780-~24 AAW a 201d in this regard, it a presumption of regularity Consequently, when applying al record, the burden ig on error or injustice, Sincerely, ROBERT J. O'NEILL Executive Director Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9781 14
You requested that the fitness report for 2 June 2012 to 20 June 2013 be modified, in accordance with the reporting senior’s (RS's) letter dated 27 September 2013, by raising the marks in sections E.3 (*Effectiveness-under Stress”), F.2 (“Developing Subordinates”), F.3 (“Setting the Example”) and F.5 (“Communication Skills”) from “D” (fourth best of seven possible marks) to “E” (third best) and lowering the mark in section F.4 (“Ensuring Well-being of Subordinates”) from “EB” to “Za” A...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9784 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, In addition, the Board considered the ‘report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 20 August 2014, a Copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9785 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9787 14
Further, the Board particularly noted that you ing senior have provided nothing showing that either the reporti or the reviewing officer has acknowledged that the two-tiered evaluation system, to which you and the statement dated 1 May — a he all ee 2014 from Captain i -, USMC refer, was applied in preparing your fitness report. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board - prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9789 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2014. evidence is'evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying ' for-a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9792 14
in addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board {(PERB), dated 20 August 2014, a copy of which is attached, and your letter dated 15 September 2014. a conscientious consideration of the entire After careful an vidence submitted was record, the Board found that the e insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9794 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, cogether with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable SS SLaLUTEeSs, to addition, the Board considered the regulations and policies. New evidence 15 evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9802 14
Finally, Sailors with a record of misconduct, such as yours, would normally receive a discharge under other than honorable conditions, and as such, the Board concluded you were fortunate to have received an honorable characterization of service. is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9814 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR988 14
EGA Docket No: 0988-14 23 March 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ry osu, XXX-XX- Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Mr. O'Neill, Ms. McCain, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 February 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9895 11
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...