NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8665 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement for a Personally Procured Move (PPM). The Board, consisting 0: i reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 Mare 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8673 14_Redacted
01 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 RGA Docket No: 8673-14 20 clanvsry 2015 This is in reference to your latest reconsideration request dated 22 July 2014. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request Documentary material considered by the Board of your application and any material submitted in pp yo application After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the post service clinical correspondence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8677 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1007 2.8 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of ref referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosu requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advancement to a higher grade. f | f 5 Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board For Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR868 14
Le requ agTaLTLOMs Of erro tae HAPArAanee n accordance DUT s Amer vor your @ e; for three missing s mov r t Additionally, you were counseled and warned on t occasions that further misconduct could result in administra e diechar VE QALSCilealr due to a pattern o! New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8685 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8693 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advancement to a higher grade. The Board, consisting of =e reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8698 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 3 January 2014. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8699 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 01 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No. a warrants favorable CONCLUSION: evidence of record, and consideration of all the and (3), the Upon review and he contents of enclosures (2) especially in light of t Board finds an injustice RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where f rank and effective date in the grade vice 1 May 2014; and that his lineal a. appropriate, tos of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR870 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8701 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR8701-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8704 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR871 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner had 20 qualifying years vice 19 years for a non-regular Reserve retirement. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on li August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8716 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8728 14
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying section I of the fitness report for i November 2012 to 31 March 2013 as you requested. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8731 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8732 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereoi, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Boaro prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8733 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction cof Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8734 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2014. evidence not previously considered by the Board its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying | for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8735 14
In addition, the Board considered the reports of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 18 July and 24 November 2014, copies of which are attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8736 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8738 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing any and all references to the nonjudicial punishment (NIP) imposed on 21 May 2012. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by totally obliterating or removing the 21 May 2012 NUP, and all other references thereto. That any and all materials or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8755 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7oi s. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1901 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2499 HD Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the *special’ enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 July to 31 August 2012 (copy at Tab A). CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8758 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. NR8758-14 1 Apr 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a} Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as.Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR876 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. Because of a civil court case Secretary of the Navy was directed to reconsider his decision made in the Records (BCNR) to consider your case regarding your forced retirement per the FY09 Colonel SRB. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8768 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR8768-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR877 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the previous Permanent Duty Station (PDS) rate based on a close proximity move. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8771 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1430 Ser 812/0054 dated 11 February 2015, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR8771-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8773 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8778 14
NR8778-14 1 Apr 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correctio F Naval Record To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW GF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action, ~ Docket No: NR8778-14 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: ‘a. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8780 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket 26 Mar 1 N NR8780-14 tio cea: This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. NR&780-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8787 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of-an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8793 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing or modifying the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 June 2011 to 15 dune 2012 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 23 October 2014, and pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8795 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bey, Mr. Genteman, and Ms. Polk reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR880 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR882 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed | enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to B-4/¥YN3 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8854 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7o1s. NR8854-14 20 February 2015 ‘From: Chaizman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy »»j REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (*Administrative Remarks (1070)"}...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR889 14
Whether or not you are eligible for benefits based on either period of service is a matter under the cognizance of the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on 5 the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8890 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 9 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8899 14
Your application claims “I was not counseled on the effects of my ability to transfer 9/11 education benefits prior to reenlistment. The Board concurs with the advisory opinion that changing your reenlistment contract from 3 years to 4 years will not satisfy the *service obligation for transferring your Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits since you attempted the transfer in July 2014 vice May 2014. The Board has determined and agrees with the advisory opinion, that if you wish to be eligible to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8902 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Fvaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 23 September...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR896 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of service, desire to upgrade your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8961 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 11 March 2009 and 11 August 2011. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosures (2) and (3), the Board finds the existence of an error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9033 13_Redacted
You were then advised that your command was recommending you for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service due to misconduct. You waived your procedural right to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9087 14
DEFARTWENT OF Tc WAV. BOARD EOP CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS sty & COURTHOUSE RE yt) Sure 10071 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Get, 14 Tae ar PA a A aemnn neanwA Faw Rawrnatian nf Nate Daanwrac Voy ote Cla LTmeny wuss forrectice f2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9106 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings ef this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9136 14
The ADB found that based upon his GCM conviction, he committed misconduct and recommended an OTH characterization of service. CONCLUSTON: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, especially in light of Petitioner’s GCM conviction being dismissed during appellate review, the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting upgrading Petitioner’s OTH discharge to an honorable characterization of service. c. That Petitioner’s record be further corrected...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9143 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9146 14
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested fitness report by marking section A, item 6.a (*Commendatory Material”) and adding, to section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), "Directed Comment: MRO [Marine reported on] received a Meritorious Mast on 24 April 2008.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2014. New...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9149 14
Tt is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removing the contested fitness report for 1 July 2010 to-16 May 2011. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, In...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9150 14
It ig noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested fitness report by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), "MRO [Marine reported on] best performs in an environment working for staif noncommissioned officers and senior enlisted Marines who can supervise her daily tasks so as to ensure details are adhered to and timeliness is attained.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,...