NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10804 14_Redacted
DEP AR Tiveik ss Gr + fae Meee Se em Fak SOP PpeECTION MOF NAVAL RECORDS 7o1 Ss. Col RTHOUSE ROAD, SU! FE Tew ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Y i 3 oa tn ona [a ct the circumstances 0 weE-Gai1iLOo eS cannot be taken.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10805 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1081 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-312 of 2 Apr 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1085 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant: to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10851 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10851 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1089 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 8. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/EN3 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 April 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10917 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD. SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 From mn, Board for Correction of Naval Records ro: ry O© the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO an immediate reenlistment contract error and at 1c regulations, available under existing law and re the Navy. NR10917-14 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10921 14
your latest reconsideration request Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 28 January 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that your assertion of post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10921 14_Redacted
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 28 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. .fter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that your assertion of post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), even though not previously considered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10929 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to reflect Petitioner is Retired. I eeemmtims reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1093 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. The Board noted that applicable regulations provide that an RE-3K reentry code is the most favorable code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of being disenrolled from a commissioning program. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10930 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by revoking his reenlistment code of RE-30 (refused oraers assigned without sufficient obligated service remaining) . f. In enclosure (4), Petitioner contends that his having been assigned the RE-1A reenlistment code justifies removing the contested entry concerning the RE-30 code. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10937 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10955 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advancement to a higher grade. The Board, consisting of | a mw reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 April 2015 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1096 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10965 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 December 2014. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NR10965-14 for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10968 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TOE T Naeger A “ a ae a « ) + + T ME mice. seam) ) at anc 4 + nisttr EequiatClons Dbl Oo the Doc lered by Your apr ait support th naval re a Ke sar arions: es WYus Gael wide t A Jal: Ge ry Decemde2 iKen drivin enn £4 abuse rehabilitation failure and civil conviction. Finally, the Board noted that there is no evidence in the record to support your assertion.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10970 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 10970-14 2 April 2015 This is in reference to your latest reconsideration request dated 22 September 2014. vou previously petitioned the Board and were advised in our letter that your applications had been granted partial relief. Although your application was submitted without any new evidence not previously considered: the Board found it in the interest...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11 14
In the transmittal letter, the reporting senior explains that all original reports were erroneously submitted with the same “Promotable” promotion recommendation. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the following original fitness report and related material, inciuding the letter of transmittal dated 10 July 2013, leaving in the record the supplemental report covering the same period: Period of Report Date of Report Reporting Senior From To Wie) Feb 12 O01 Dec 12 15 Dec...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1100 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O1 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SIN Docket No: 1100-14 5 February 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy XXX-XX . This evidence led the Board to reasonably conclude that the PTSD condition was caused by traumatic service connected events and existed at the time of his discharge. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that ‘on 18 September 1970,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1100 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SJN Docket No: 1100-14 5 February 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tos Secretary of the Navy ee Ref: (a) 10 U.8e€; TSS52 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11010 14
NR11010-14 28 Jan 15 From: Chairman, Roard for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement for a Personally Procured Move (PPM). c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed ain Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11045 14
You are advised that when a request for corrective action is denied by the Board, sitting in executive session, new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered must be submitted in order to have the Board reconsider its decision. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence within one year from the date of the Board’ s decision. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11046 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner submitted a timely written request to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) category of coverage from “former spouse” to “spouse” coverage, before his “former spouse’s" death. b. , (Petitioner), and were marriea on 17 July 1960, enclosure (3) and divorced on 11 May 1976, enclosure (4). g. On 2 October 2013, DFAS...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1105 15_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of the record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11050 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NR11050-14 30 December 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1CO
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11072 14
been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 4 February 2015. in your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11076 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, were insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11081 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference ta), Subject, nereinafter referred to as petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the appticable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 July to 13 December 2008 (copy at Tab A). ee reviewed petitioner's allegations of error ang injustice on 12 February 2025, and pursuant to its regulations, detezmined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11083 14
ae Hecembe ait reques The Board, im its review of your entire on 1 V E carefully weighed all potenti Laly your desire to upgrade your d scharge and assertion that you should not have to continue to suffer for a mistake you made as 4 young man. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant relief in your case because of the seriousness OL your uLuy selatea museconduer which 158 retiected by your failure to heed to the Navy's Zero Tolerance Policy. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11097 14
NR11097-14 21 Jan 15 From: Chairman, Roard for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj]: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. 2, The Board, consisting of (JJ aaa, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1111 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel, and then issue, an immediate reenlistment contract. Moreover, the Petitioner was released from active service ca 8 November 2013. c. The Petitioner executed a 2 year immediate reenlistment contract (NAVPERS 1070/601), on or about 28 April 2013. ad. ROBERT D. ZSALMAN Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11116 14
NR11116-14 20 Nov 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy <<< Ref: {a} Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bey, Ms. Countryman, and Mr. Koman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11129 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 11129-14 8 May 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Commandant of the Marine Corps (MMRP) Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF EX-PVT ~ Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Enel: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1113 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner enlisted in the Full Time Support (FTS) program. ‘The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11155 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11166 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JEA Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to issue an immediate reenlistment contract. The petitioner executed a 3 year immediate reenlistment contract (NAVPERS 1070/601), on or about 19 October 2012.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11182 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Ms. McCain, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11195 14
A three-member panel of the-Board for Correction of Naval, Records, - sitting in executive session, considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice with administrative regulations and procedures the proceedings of this Board. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11216 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JEA Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel, and then issue an agreement to extend enlistment. The Board, consisting o ay a reviewed Petitioner’s allegations o rror and injustice on 4 May...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11217 14
NR11217-14 1 May 15 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUMED letter 1000 Ser M1/15UM10016 dated 25 February 2015, a copy of which is attached. NR11217-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1122 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2015. in this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reentry code based on your circumstances. The RE-3C reentry code may not prohibit reenlistment, but requires.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11222 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing three undated service record page il (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries stating Petitioner is eligible but not recommended for promotion to sergeant for June, July and August (no year given) “because of Physical Fitness shortcoming” (copies at Tab A). The Board, consisting of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11236 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2015. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 30 September 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11237 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BCARD FoR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No: NR11237-14 29 vanuary zuis of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record ang applicable statutes, regulations and Policies. evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s decision. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11241 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2015. | New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11247 14
Pursuant to the provisions of itioner, filed indicat ary Gh 3f consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corre action. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11256 14
NR11256-14 22 January 2015 This is in reference to your counsel’s letter on your behalf dated 25 September 2014 with enclosures, seeking reconsideration of your previous application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552, In your previous case, docket number 9039-13, you requested reinstatement to your class and promotion to lieutenant colonel and colonel. This request was denied on 14 August 2014. , A three-member...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1126 14
.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2015. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse at which time you waived your procedural rights to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...